PFAS portfolio review
Find out which of your materials count as PFAS under each definition that applies where you sell.
ProjectsPFAS portfolio review
- Priya Okafor
- Lukas Brandt
- Amara Nwosu
| Material | EU proposal | US TSCA | Minnesota | Maine |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTFE | PFAS, Restricted later | PFAS, Report in 2027 | PFAS, Report by 14 Dec | PFAS, Restricted later |
| FKM | PFAS, Restricted later | PFAS, Report in 2027 | PFAS, Report by 14 Dec | PFAS, Restricted later |
| PVDF | PFAS, Restricted later | No, Out of scope | PFAS, Report by 14 Dec | PFAS, Restricted later |
| EPDM | No, Out of scope | No, Out of scope | No, Out of scope | No, Out of scope |
| HNBR | No, Out of scope | No, Out of scope | No, Out of scope | No, Out of scope |
- Minnesota: Report by 14 Dec
- US TSCA: Report in 2027
- EU proposal and Maine: Restricted later
- Out of scope
PVDF US TSCA
Verdicts: Out of scopeNot PFAS under the TSCA rule
- Test
- One of 3 set structures, 40 CFR 705.3
- Elsewhere
- PFAS in the EU, Minnesota and Maine
Your expert signs off every verdict
You get the PFAS matrix, the definitions agreed before any checking starts, and the source behind every verdict.
Approval
Illustrative projectPriya Okafor
Status: ApprovedHead of Regulatory Affairs, after checking the verdicts under all 4 definitions against their sources
EU restriction proposal
US TSCA reporting rule
Minnesota’s reporting rule
Maine’s PFAS law
Foresight does the research
Your team brings what only it knows, and your expert makes the call at each checkpoint.
Tasks
Status: In progressIllustrative project3 of 5 tasks done.
Share your materials
Your team
Status: DoneFind the definitions
Foresight
Status: DoneAgree the definitions
CheckpointStatus: ApprovedPriya Okafor
Check every material
Foresight
Status: In progressApprove the review
CheckpointStatus: Not startedPriya Okafor
Kept current once it’s approved
Monitoring watches the measures behind your verdicts. When one moves, Foresight rechecks the cells it affects, and your expert reviews the change.
Monitoring
Illustrative projectWatching 4 measures behind the verdicts
- Status: To review
US TSCA section 8(a)(7) PFAS rule
EPA moved the start of reporting from 13 April 2026 to 31 January 2027 at the latest. Rechecked, still to report.
Minnesota PFAS in products reporting
EU universal PFAS restriction
Maine Revised Statutes, 38 §1614
What we need from you
Four things, shared at setup before the project starts.
Your materials
A list of materials, or your products with their safety data sheets or supplier declarations.
Your markets
Where you sell today, down to the US states with their own PFAS laws.
Your priorities
What’s most urgent for you, such as a reporting deadline or a customer’s question.
Your approver
The person who agrees the definitions and approves the review.
What teams ask about this project
Why check each material against more than one definition?
Because the definitions differ. The EU’s proposal and several US states count any fully fluorinated carbon, while EPA’s TSCA rule asks for one of three set structures. PVDF, for example, is a PFAS in the EU and Minnesota but isn’t reportable under TSCA.
Where does the evidence come from?
From the measures themselves: the regulations, the statutes and the regulators’ own guidance. Every verdict links to its source, so your team can check the wording directly.
What about additives we don’t know about?
Foresight checks the base material, and asks your suppliers about anything added to it, such as a fluorinated processing aid or coating. A material that isn’t a PFAS can still carry one, so the review records what each supplier confirmed.
Who checks the review before we use it?
The person you name. They agree the definitions before any checking starts, and check the verdicts against their sources at the end. Nothing is final until they approve it. These checks reduce the risk of error without removing it.
What happens when a rule changes?
Foresight rechecks the cells it affects, such as when a deadline or a derogation moves. The review your expert approved stays as it is until they accept the change.
What does it cost?
The price follows how many materials and markets the review covers. You see it with the scope, before any checking starts.
More ways to understand your exposure
Each runs the same way, with your expert approving the result.
- Substance risk heatmapRegulatory pressure by substance and market.
- Global legislation registerApplicable legislation, mapped to your scope and sources.
- Portfolio impact assessmentThe products, formulations and markets a regulatory change reaches.
- Market entry requirementsThe registrations, notifications and labels a product needs before it sells in a new market.
- Substitution screeningAlternatives to a substance of concern, checked for their own hazards and restrictions.
- Sustainable procurement reviewSuppliers and materials reviewed against your requirements.
Bring your materials list to a demo
Tell us where you sell. You’ll see the scope and the price before any checking starts.
