PPWR self-assessment

Start now

European Commission Corrects Nitric Acid Concentration Boundary In Bulgarian CLP Text

Dr Steven Brennan
Dr Steven Brennan
3 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed
Laboratory vessels inside a chemical fume hood

Key takeaway

What This Development Means

An official European Union corrigendum to the Bulgarian legal text changes the nitric acid concentration condition for Annex VI index number 007-004-00-1 from 70% or less to above 70%. The correction removes an overlap with the lower-concentration entry. Suppliers should review classification records, safety data sheets and labels, especially for products at or near 70%.

Does the corrigendum change nitric acid's harmonised hazards?

No. It corrects the concentration condition attached to one Annex VI entry in the Bulgarian text. The existing harmonised classifications and supplier obligations remain. Businesses should check whether the erroneous boundary caused the wrong entry to be assigned in their own product data.

Which entry covers nitric acid at exactly 70%?

The lower-concentration entry, index number 007-030-00-3, covers concentrations at or below 70%. The corrected index number 007-004-00-1 applies only when the nitric acid concentration is greater than 70%, including in supplied mixtures.

Source basis: Corrigendum C/2026/6697, OJ L 2026/90787

Bulgarian CLP Nitric Acid Concentration Error Is Corrected

The nitric acid concentration boundary for Annex VI index number 007-004-00-1 has been corrected in the Bulgarian-language text of the EU CLP amendment. Corrigendum C/2026/6697, published on 23 September 2026, changes the entry's concentration condition from “C less than or equal to 70%” to “C greater than 70%”.

The correction applies to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1182, commonly known as the 15th Adaptation to Technical Progress to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation. It does not create a new substance classification or reopen a proposal. It repairs the Bulgarian legal text governing an existing harmonised classification entry.

The separate nitric acid entry under index number 007-030-00-3 continues to cover concentrations at or below 70%. The corrected wording therefore removes an apparent overlap and confirms that a product containing exactly 70% nitric acid remains within the lower-concentration boundary, not the corrected greater-than-70% condition.

What Changes And What Remains Unchanged

Only the concentration condition shown for index number 007-004-00-1 in the Bulgarian text is corrected. The corrigendum does not alter nitric acid's identity, introduce a new transitional period or replace the wider Classification, Labelling and Packaging duties that already apply to suppliers.

Manufacturers and importers must continue to classify covered substances and mixtures, prepare compliant labels and packaging, and supply safety data information where required. Downstream formulators must still apply the concentration limits and mixture-classification rules relevant to their products. Employers' duties to assess corrosive and oxidising risks, control exposure and train workers also remain in place.

The practical effect depends on how a business encoded the two Annex VI entries in its regulatory data. A system that followed the erroneous text literally may have placed high-concentration products in the wrong record, created duplicate matches below 70%, or applied an incorrect reference at the exact 70% boundary.

Checks For Suppliers And Downstream Users

Suppliers should search product master data for nitric acid, index number 007-004-00-1 and mixtures close to 70%. They should then verify the selected Annex VI entry, concentration, classification rationale, label and safety data sheet. Updates should be controlled through normal change-management procedures rather than assuming that every nitric acid document must change.

Distributors and downstream users should ask suppliers to clarify any document that cites the high-concentration entry for a product at 70% or below. Workplace assessments should also be checked where regulatory classifications flow automatically into control bands or storage rules.

A one-character mathematical correction can have disproportionate consequences in automated compliance systems. Organisations should correct the underlying rule and rerun affected product records, not merely amend a single template, because the same concentration logic may feed labels, safety data sheets, transport reviews and site controls.

Get weekly regulatory updates:

Related Articles

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly for expert-picked regulatory developments across chemicals, sustainability, product safety, ESG, and HSE.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX