
CJEU Dismisses Evonik’s Appeal Over Silanamine Classification
The CJEU dismissed Evonik’s silanamine classification appeal on 5 November 2026, clarifying the use of scientific evidence and the scope of public consultation.
Foresight
2 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed

The Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed Evonik Operations’ appeal against the harmonised classification of silanamine on 5 November 2026. The judgment in C-121/25 P rejects the challenge to the classification introduced by Regulation (EU) 2022/692.
The case concerns a specified surface-treated synthetic amorphous silica, CAS 68909-20-6, described in the regulation as silanamine, 1,1,1-trimethyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)-, hydrolysis products with silica; pyrogenic, synthetic amorphous, nano, surface treated silicon dioxide. It does not decide the classification of all silica forms.
Classification And Earlier Proceedings
The 2022 regulation added classification for specific target organ toxicity following repeated exposure, category 2 (STOT RE 2), with H373 identifying the lungs and inhalation route. That regulation applied from 1 December 2023.
Evonik challenged the measure before the General Court, which dismissed its action on 27 November 2024. The new judgment dismisses the subsequent appeal; it does not create a new classification or compliance deadline.
Scientific Evidence And Consultation
The Court distinguished the general weight-of-evidence assessment from a special rule for substances not tested for specific target organ toxicity. Because relevant tests on silanamine existed, the Risk Assessment Committee could consider studies on a structurally similar substance within the overall evidence assessment without meeting that special rule’s conditions.
The Court also confirmed that public consultation under Article 37(4) of the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation concerns the classification proposal. It does not give interested parties a separate right to comment on the Risk Assessment Committee’s opinion. The Court explains these findings in paragraphs 119–132 and 185–192.
Questions about this change
Did the CJEU’s November 2026 silanamine judgment introduce a new classification?
No. The Court dismissed Evonik’s appeal against a classification introduced by Regulation (EU) 2022/692. That regulation applied from 1 December 2023; the appeal judgment creates no new compliance deadline.
Does Article 37(4) of EU CLP give a right to comment on the Risk Assessment Committee’s opinion?
No. In C-121/25 P, the CJEU confirmed that Article 37(4) allows interested parties to comment on the harmonised-classification proposal, rather than providing a separate right to comment on the committee’s opinion.
Find out what this means for your products
Foresight follows changes like this one and shows where they reach your substances, products and markets.
Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead
Foresight Weekly brings the week's regulatory changes across chemicals, product safety, sustainability, ESG and EHS into one email.
Read by professionals at

