PPWR self-assessment

Start now

US House Passes BRACE Act On Lithium-Ion Battery Storage

Dr Steven Brennan
Dr Steven Brennan
3 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed
Worker checking lithium-ion battery containers at a recycling facility

Key takeaway

What This Development Means

The United States House of Representatives has passed H.R. 9615, the BRACE Act, which would allow qualifying hazardous-waste destination facilities to store lithium-ion batteries before recycling under specified universal-waste-handler conditions. The bill is not law and does not yet change federal storage obligations. Senate passage and presidential approval remain necessary.

Has The BRACE Act Changed US Battery-Storage Law?

No. The House has passed H.R. 9615, but it is not enacted. Existing federal and state hazardous-waste, universal-waste, transport, fire-safety and permit requirements continue to apply unless and until a final law changes them.

Would The Bill Exempt All Lithium-Ion Battery Storage?

No. The proposed relief is directed at qualifying hazardous-waste destination facilities storing batteries before recycling under specified conditions. It is not a blanket exemption for generators, retailers, transporters or facilities, and other safety and environmental requirements would remain relevant.

Source basis: US House Energy and Commerce Committee, House passage of H.R. 9615 (15 September 2026)

House Advances BRACE Act Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling Bill

The United States House has passed the BRACE Act lithium-ion battery recycling bill, H.R. 9615, under suspension of the rules. The House Energy and Commerce Committee announced passage on 15 September 2026.

The measure addresses how certain hazardous-waste destination facilities may store lithium-ion batteries before recycling. It would allow qualifying storage under specified universal-waste-handler requirements instead of requiring the facility to obtain the full hazardous-waste storage permit that would otherwise apply.

The House vote does not change current law. The Senate must pass the legislation and the President must sign it before federal requirements are amended. Organisations should continue to follow existing Resource Conservation and Recovery Act rules, permits and applicable state controls.

What The Bill Would Change

The reported H.R. 9615 text is intended to remove a permitting obstacle that can limit consolidation of used lithium-ion batteries at recycling destinations. Conditional storage relief could support safer aggregation and recycling capacity, but only for facilities and practices falling within the bill's terms.

The bill does not establish a general exemption for batteries from hazardous-waste controls. Universal-waste management conditions, shipment records, employee training, accumulation practices and emergency planning remain central. Damaged, defective or recalled batteries can present elevated thermal-runaway and fire risks and may require different packaging, isolation and transport controls.

H.R. 9615 would also update a state-pre-emption reference in the Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act. Businesses should check the enacted wording, if any, before drawing conclusions about interaction with state programmes.

Implications For Battery Value Chains

Recyclers and destination facilities should model whether the proposed route would change permit needs, storage capacity or site design. They should not alter permit status or operating practices while the bill remains pending. Manufacturers, retailers and stewardship organisations should assess whether additional compliant destinations could improve collection economics and reduce long-distance transport.

Waste generators and logistics providers must continue to characterise batteries correctly and follow applicable packaging, labelling and transport rules. The bill concerns environmental storage regulation at qualifying destinations, not every workplace, fire-code or Department of Transportation requirement applying to lithium-ion batteries.

State rules can be more stringent than the federal baseline. Facilities should therefore compare the final federal measure with authorisations, state universal-waste provisions, local fire codes and insurance conditions.

Foresight analysis. If enacted, the change could reduce a regulatory bottleneck without reducing the need for robust fire prevention. The commercial benefit will depend on whether facilities can meet the conditional storage controls and obtain state acceptance, not merely on federal enactment.

Related Foresight coverage explains California's battery-stewardship bill, the batteries topic and United States regulatory news.

Get weekly regulatory updates:

Related Articles

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly for expert-picked regulatory developments across chemicals, sustainability, product safety, ESG, and HSE.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX