Key takeaway
What This Development Means
POPRC 22 will meet in Rome from 21 to 25 September 2026 and consider proposed Stockholm Convention listings for DBDPE and TBPH. The agenda is an early compliance signal for companies using brominated flame retardants in electronics, construction, automotive, textiles, plastics, waste and recycling streams.
What Is The Significance Of The Stockholm Convention POPRC 22 Agenda?
The agenda shows which substances and policy issues will be reviewed by the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee. For industry, it provides early warning of chemicals that may later face global restrictions, phase-outs or waste-management duties under the Stockholm Convention.
What Should Companies Do About DBDPE And TBPH Now?
Companies should check whether DBDPE or TBPH are present in products, components or legacy materials. Priority actions include supplier engagement, materials screening, substitution assessment, documentation updates and monitoring the POPRC process before the September 2026 meeting.
Source basis: Stockholm Convention, POPRC 22 meeting overview and provisional agenda, September 2026
The Stockholm Convention Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee will meet in Rome from 21 to 25 September 2026 to consider new technical work on persistent organic pollutants, including proposed listings for two brominated flame retardants: DBDPE and TBPH. The agenda signals potential future controls affecting chemicals, electronics, construction, automotive, textiles, plastics, waste, recycling and supply chain compliance teams.
POPRC 22 Agenda: What Is Being Considered?
The provisional agenda for the twenty-second meeting includes technical work on draft risk profiles, proposed chemical listings, PFAS-related exemptions and monitoring activities. A key item is the consideration of chemicals proposed for listing in Annexes A, B and/or C of the Stockholm Convention.
The Committee will review decabromodiphenylethane (DBDPE) and its related brominated substance, proposed by Norway, and bis(2-ethylhexyl) tetrabromophthalate (TBPH), proposed by the European Union.
If the Committee finds that the proposals meet Article 8 and Annex D requirements, it may agree workplans for draft risk profiles. This is an early but important step towards possible global restriction or elimination measures.
DBDPE And TBPH: Why Industry Should Pay Attention
DBDPE is a non-reactive brominated flame-retardant additive used in electrical and electronic equipment, automotive components, construction materials and textiles. The proposal states that EU imports are between 10,000 and 100,000 tonnes per year, with significant production or import also reported in the United States, Canada, Australia and China.
TBPH is used mainly as a non-reactive flame retardant and plasticiser, including in flexible PVC for wires and cable insulation, rigid polyurethane in construction and flexible polyurethane in upholstery. The EU proposal notes that TBPH is registered under REACH at 100 to 1,000 tonnes per year in the EEA.
Both proposals cite concerns around persistence, bioaccumulation, long-range environmental transport and adverse effects. These are core screening areas under the Stockholm Convention.
What Companies Should Do Before September 2026
Manufacturers, importers, formulators, article producers, retailers and recyclers should begin mapping whether DBDPE, TBPH or related trade names appear in substances, mixtures, components, coatings, foams, cables, plastics, textiles or legacy stock.
Practical steps include requesting supplier declarations, reviewing safety data sheets and bills of materials, checking flame-retardant specifications, identifying affected product lines, and assessing substitution options. Waste handlers and recyclers should also review exposure risks from treated articles entering reuse or recycling streams.
Related Articles
EPA Identifies Significant Health Risks From Diisononyl Phthalate (DINP) Under TSCA Evaluation
Learn about the EPA's final TSCA risk evaluation for DINP, its health risks for workers, and upcoming regulatory actions to ensure safety.
EPA Identifies Unreasonable Health Risks From Diisodecyl Phthalate (DIDP) In Workplace Settings
The EPA’s final evaluation of DIDP highlights significant workplace health risks, particularly for female workers exposed to spray-applied adhesives and paints.
Norway Investigation Highlights Persistent Concerns Over Flame Retardant EBTBP
Learn about ECHA’s evaluation of EBTBP, a flame retardant flagged for its environmental persistence and potential health risks, and the ongoing regulatory review process.
