
EPA Seeks Experts For Critical Review Of Phthalates Risk Evaluations
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a call for nominations of scientific experts to join its Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC). These experts will critically review Draft Risk Evaluations for two significant phthalates: Di-isodecyl Phthalate (DIDP) and Di-isononyl Phthalate (DINP), under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).The EPA's decision to evaluate DIDP and DINP risks concurrently in 2019 is based on their shared characteristics. Both chemicals, commonly used as plasticizers in PVC, have similar physical properties and potential human and environmental exposure risks. This assessment highlights the EPA's proactive approach to chemical safety and pollution prevention.
Published in March 2024. Dates, deadlines and stages may have changed since.
2 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a call for nominations of scientific experts to join its Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC). These experts will critically review Draft Risk Evaluations for two significant phthalates: Di-isodecyl Phthalate (DIDP) and Di-isononyl Phthalate (DINP), under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
The EPA's decision to evaluate DIDP and DINP risks concurrently in 2019 is based on their shared characteristics. Both chemicals, commonly used as plasticizers in PVC, have similar physical properties and potential human and environmental exposure risks. This assessment highlights the EPA's proactive approach to chemical safety and pollution prevention.
Expertise Sought
The EPA seeks scientists with extensive qualifications in areas relevant to this peer review. Specializations of interest include health and ecological risk assessment, exposure to consumer products and indoor air, and ingestion exposure routes, among others. This initiative reflects the agency's dedication to a scientifically rigorous evaluation process.
Nomination Guidelines
Nominees should refrain from submitting confidential or sensitive information. The EPA requires nominees to provide detailed financial disclosures to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure the review's integrity. This transparency is crucial for maintaining the credibility of the evaluation process.
The SACC's peer review is slated for a public meeting in the summer, underscoring the EPA's commitment to transparency and scientific integrity. This review is a pivotal step in finalizing the EPA's risk evaluations and informing risk management decisions under TSCA.
How To Nominate
The deadline for nominations is 1 April 2024. Interested parties should send their nominations to the SACC via the specified email address, marking a significant step towards safeguarding chemical safety and environmental health.
The SACC serves as an essential advisory body to the EPA, offering independent scientific advice and recommendations on risk assessments, methodologies, and pollution prevention for TSCA-regulated chemicals. This call for expert nominations represents a vital move towards ensuring the responsible use of chemicals in the U.S.
Official source
federalregister.gov
Dr Steven Brennan
CEO and co-founder of Foresight, and a co-opted member of ECHA's Committee for Socio-economic Analysis. He holds a PhD in chemical engineering.
More from Dr Steven BrennanFind out what this means for your products
Foresight follows changes like this one and shows where they reach your substances, products and markets.
- TSCA reportingThe TSCA status of each substance you make in or import into the US, and when each report is due.
- Portfolio impact assessmentThe products, formulations and markets a regulatory change reaches.
- Regulatory horizon scanningAlerts scored for your organisation, most important first.
Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead
Foresight Weekly brings the week's regulatory changes across chemicals, product safety, sustainability, ESG and EHS into one email.
Read by professionals at

