US State PFAS Regulation

Legislative and regulatory actions by individual U.S. states to restrict, ban, or require reporting of PFAS in consumer products, packaging, and industrial applications.

Foresight tracks US State PFAS Regulation developments and surfaces the alerts most likely to matter before they turn into missed deadlines, recalls, or escalation work.

Not ready for a trial? Take the 3-minute readiness assessment

Current activity

Steady

In line with the prior 8-week baseline

3-month trend

Latest alerts below

Last updated

20 May 2026, 17:53

View alerts

Latest US State PFAS Regulation developments

Source-backed regulatory and guidance signals tracked by Foresight, with the newest developments first.

California Assembly Amends AB 1603 PFAS Pesticide Phase-Out Bill

California has amended and advanced AB 1603, a bill that would classify PFAS-containing agricultural pesticides as restricted materials from 2028 and phase out specified PFAS actives by 2030 and all PFAS pesticide ingredients by 2035. If enacted, this would force pesticide manufacturers and growers using these PFAS actives in California to plan substitution, reformulation, and PFAS risk controls well ahead of the proposed deadlines.

leginfo.legislature.ca.govUnited StatesUnited States

United States: PFAS Litigation and 14 State Cosmetic Bans Reshape Beauty Industry Compliance

A May 2026 Crowell & Moring client alert warns that rising PFAS class actions and 14 US state bans or restrictions on PFAS in cosmetics are rapidly reshaping compliance expectations for the beauty and personal care sector. Companies selling nationwide will increasingly need to reformulate products, strengthen supply-chain transparency and track diverging state rules to avoid enforcement, litigation and loss of access to key markets.

crowell.comUnited StatesUnited States

Minnesota Legislature Approves Omnibus Environment and Natural Resources Bill S.F. 2077

In May 2026, the Minnesota Legislature repassed omnibus environment and natural resources bill S.F. 2077, combining 2026–2027 appropriations with new enforcement tools for PFAS, mercury-containing skin-lightening products, water-use fees, abandoned watercraft and closed landfill remediation. If enacted, this package will materially expand state funding and enforcement capacity around PFAS and microplastics, increase costs and permitting complexity for high-volume water users, and heighten compliance expectations for Minnesota retailers and operators whose products or operations intersect with these programmes.

revisor.mn.govUnited StatesUnited States

Minnesota SF 2077 Omnibus Environment Bill Proposes Expanded PFAS Monitoring, Product Law Implementation, and Research Funding

Minnesota’s omnibus environment and natural resources bill SF 2077, now in conference, would significantly expand PFAS biomonitoring, enforcement of PFAS product and packaging laws, and PFAS-focused research and remediation funding for the 2026–2027 biennium. If enacted, this package will strengthen Minnesota’s ability to monitor and enforce PFAS use and releases, fund new treatment technologies and PFAS reduction grants, and increase compliance and enforcement risk for PFAS-containing products and facilities over the rest of the decade.

revisor.mn.govUnited StatesUnited States

Missouri House Refers PFAS Product Ban Bill HB 2400 to Emerging Issues Committee

Missouri lawmakers are considering House Bill 2400, now referred to the House Emerging Issues Committee, which would require PFAS-using manufacturers to report product-level PFAS use by early 2027 and phase in a broad ban on products with intentionally added PFAS from 2033, with limited currently unavoidable use exemptions. If enacted, this would drive significant reformulation, data-reporting and supply-chain due diligence for companies selling into Missouri as the bill progresses toward its proposed 2026 effective date.

documents.house.mo.govUnited StatesUnited States

New York Assembly Further Amends Bill A07594B On PFAS, PAHs, And Lead In Playground Surfacing

On 14 May 2026 the New York Assembly reprinted playground surfacing bill A07594 as version 7594-B, retaining the proposed ban on PFAS-, PAH- and lead-containing playground surfacing but deferring its start until after 31 December 2028 and simplifying how compliance is demonstrated. If enacted, suppliers of playground surfacing into New York would gain more lead time yet still face an eventual prohibition linked to future DEC threshold-setting, making early reformulation and monitoring of forthcoming regulations important for long-term market access.

assembly.state.ny.usUnited StatesUnited States

Delaware House Committee Advances HS1 for HB356 on PFAS in Firefighting Foam and Equipment

In May 2026, the Delaware House Health & Human Development Committee advanced House Substitute 1 for HB356, a bill that would restrict PFAS in firefighting foam and firefighting PPE and establish recall, labelling and exemption rules. If enacted, this would force foam manufacturers, bulk petroleum facilities and fire service equipment buyers in Delaware to plan for a 2027–2028 transition away from PFAS-based foams, new reporting and notice duties, and potential civil penalties for non-compliance.

legis.delaware.govUnited StatesUnited States

New Hampshire Senate Approves HB 1275 Amending PFAS Drinking Water Standard Definition

In May 2026, the New Hampshire Senate passed HB 1275, revising the PFAS-related drinking water standard definition used in the state’s PFAS fund and water programmes. This change clarifies when PFAS contamination in drinking water qualifies for state support and allows alignment with federal PFAS limits, signalling sustained regulatory focus on PFAS risk for water suppliers and affected communities.

gc.nh.govUnited StatesUnited States

New York Assembly Amends PFAS Drinking Water MCL Proposal (A08634B)

In May 2026, New York lawmakers advanced amended Assembly Bill A08634B, proposing strict statutory PFAS maximum contaminant levels in public drinking water together with firm reporting and compliance dates. If enacted, public water systems will need to plan treatment and monitoring upgrades to meet thresholds as low as 4 parts per trillion by 2029, signalling tighter state PFAS policy and significant infrastructure investment needs.

assembly.state.ny.usUnited StatesUnited States

Minnesota MPCA Clarifies PRISM Grouping for PFAS Product Reporting

Minnesota is reminding manufacturers that PFAS-in-products reports under Amara’s Law must be filed through the PRISM system against fixed 2026 deadlines, with extensions, waivers and annual updates governed by specific cut-off dates. The latest PRISM tip and supplemental guide explain how to group similar products and PFAS-containing components to streamline reporting, so companies should align product hierarchies, supplier data and internal processes with these rules ahead of the first reporting cycle.

pca.state.mn.usUnited StatesUnited States

New York Assembly Bill A10696A Proposes PFAS Ban in Photovoltaic Modules From 2028

New York lawmakers have introduced amended Assembly Bill A10696A, which would prohibit the sale, offer for sale and manufacture of photovoltaic modules containing intentionally added PFAS in the state from 1 January 2028. If enacted, this would extend state-level PFAS controls into the solar supply chain, forcing PV module manufacturers, importers and project developers to eliminate PFAS from designs and coordinate with suppliers well ahead of the proposed 2028 compliance date.

assembly.state.ny.usUnited StatesUnited States

Vermont Senate Committees Advance H.727 Data Center Bill With PFAS Wastewater Controls

Vermont lawmakers are advancing House Bill 727, a sustainable data centre bill that would require PFAS-focused wastewater monitoring and prohibit adding PFAS to water discharged from new large data centres, with the measure now moving through key Senate committees in May 2026. If enacted, data centre developers and utilities would need to bake PFAS monitoring, stricter water-use permitting and reporting, and decommissioning and financing requirements into project design, siting and contracts, potentially influencing where and how large data centres are built in Vermont.

legislature.vermont.govUnited StatesUnited States

New York Bill S08933A Would Ban Intentionally Added PFAS in Photovoltaic Modules From 2028

New York has introduced amended bill S08933A, which would prohibit the sale, offer for sale and manufacture of photovoltaic modules containing intentionally added PFAS in the state from 1 January 2028. If enacted, PV manufacturers, importers and suppliers serving New York would need to remove intentionally added PFAS from module designs or redirect affected products well ahead of the 2028 cut-off while closely monitoring the bill’s progress after its revival in committee.

assembly.state.ny.usUnited StatesUnited States

Mamavation Testing Finds PFAS-Laden Pesticides on Driscoll’s Strawberries, Highlighting California AB 1603 PFAS Pesticides Bill

New consumer testing shows PFAS-linked pesticide residues on Driscoll’s conventional strawberries in California, while organic samples were clean, and campaigners are using the results to rally support for state bill AB 1603 to phase out PFAS in pesticides. If adopted, AB 1603 would progressively ban PFAS-containing pesticides from 2028–2035, creating significant substitution, registration, and supply chain risks for pesticide manufacturers, growers, and retailers relying on these chemistries.

mamavation.comUnited StatesUnited States

California Senate Sets 14 May 2026 Appropriations Hearing On SB-1313 PFAS Drinking Water Bill

The California Senate Appropriations Committee has rescheduled SB‑1313, a bill amending state drinking water law on PFAS, for a hearing on 14 May 2026. This signals continued momentum behind California’s PFAS drinking water agenda and gives public water systems and PFAS‑exposed suppliers a near‑term milestone for tracking potential funding and compliance impacts.

leginfo.legislature.ca.govUnited StatesUnited States

New York Senate Advances Amended PFAS Bill S07839B On Medical Adhesives And Bandages

On 27 April 2026, the New York Senate amended PFAS bill S07839 to version S07839B and advanced it to third reading, progressing a proposal to ban PFAS in medical adhesives and bandages one year after the law takes effect. If enacted, manufacturers and sellers of covered medical adhesives and bandages in New York will need to eliminate intentionally added PFAS, comply with a DEC‑set PFAS concentration limit, and manage certificate‑of‑compliance and civil‑penalty risks aligned with the amended Environmental Conservation Law.

assembly.state.ny.usUnited StatesUnited States

California Assembly Appropriations Committee Sets 14 May 2026 Hearing for PFAS Pesticide Bill AB 1603

The California Assembly Appropriations Committee has scheduled a 14 May 2026 hearing on AB 1603, a bill directing the Department of Pesticide Regulation to address PFAS in pesticides. If advanced, this bill could introduce new PFAS-related requirements for pesticide products, signalling tighter scrutiny of PFAS use for agrochemical manufacturers and users in California.

leginfo.legislature.ca.govUnited StatesUnited States

New Jersey Assembly Bill A5048 Proposes Ban on PFAS in Apparel

New Jersey is considering Assembly Bill A5048, an Assembly companion to Senate Bill S1281, to ban the sale, manufacture and distribution of apparel containing intentionally added PFAS, with the ban taking effect two years after the act becomes effective. If enacted, this would extend New Jersey’s PFAS consumer products law to textiles, forcing apparel brands selling into the state to eliminate intentionally added PFAS from most clothing lines and plan for a two-year reformulation and supply chain transition window.

njleg.state.nj.usUnited StatesUnited States

Illinois House Schedules SoyFoam Firefighting Foam Resolution After Committee Approval

On 7 May 2026, an Illinois House committee unanimously recommended adoption of a non-binding resolution urging the State Fire Marshal and local fire departments to replace existing firefighting foams with soy-based SoyFoam, and the measure was placed on the House calendar. While not yet legally binding, this progress signals growing political pressure to phase out PFAS-based foams in Illinois, so EHS, procurement, and chemicals teams should monitor for follow-on legislation or procurement rules that could formalise a PFAS-free transition.

ilga.govUnited StatesUnited States

North Carolina Senate Refers PFAS-Focused 2026 Water Safety Act (S1043) to Rules Committee

North Carolina is advancing the 2026 Water Safety Act (S1043), a PFAS-focused bill that would establish strict PFAS drinking water standards, industrial discharge controls, and substantial funding for PFAS mitigation, research, firefighter protection, and water-resource studies, now under review by the Senate Rules and Operations Committee. If enacted, the act would materially increase PFAS compliance obligations for public water systems and industrial dischargers in North Carolina, drive expanded monitoring of PFAS in wastewater and biosolids, and reshape long-term planning around water infrastructure, contamination management, and interbasin transfers.

ncleg.govUnited StatesUnited States

Not a newsletter. Not a feed. Structured intelligence mapped to your business.

These are just a few of the most recent US State PFAS Regulation alerts. Foresight tracks every jurisdiction, every day — and surfaces only what affects your portfolio, with full citations and evidence.

Start free trial

Topic context

How to read US State PFAS Regulation regulatory activity

Definition

What is US State PFAS Regulation?

Legislative and regulatory actions by individual U.S. states to restrict, ban, or require reporting of PFAS in consumer products, packaging, and industrial applications.

Industry relevance

Why it matters

US State PFAS Regulation developments can change product scope, supplier expectations, market access, reporting duties, and risk ownership. Foresight tracks the signals early so teams can respond before obligations become urgent.

Foresight tracking

How Foresight monitors it

Foresight monitors official sources, extracts structured regulatory intelligence, and maps alerts to a customer's products, substances, markets, and priorities so teams see the relevant signal with source evidence for review.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about Foresight's regulatory intelligence platform

Still have questions? Get in touch with our team

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly for expert-picked regulatory developments across chemicals, sustainability, product safety, ESG, and HSE.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX