News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

Tattoo Artists Union and Auville Challenge EU REACH Restriction

REACH
28
August 2024
•
420
Dr Steven Brennan
The applicants seek €50,000 claiming it unfairly restricts tattoo ink substances. The applicants also argue the regulation hinders business freedom.
Tattooist tattooing an arm
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The Syndicat National des Artistes Tatoueurs et des professionnels du tatouage, along with renowned tattoo artist Cyril Auville, have initiated legal action against the European Commission, contesting a regulation that has significantly impacted the tattoo industry across Europe. The case, filed on 31 May 2024, with the European Union's General Court, is recorded under case number T-294/24.

The applicants, represented by lawyer F. Di Vizio, are seeking compensation totaling €50,000 for various damages and are challenging the validity of Commission Regulation (EU) 2020/2081. This regulation, which amended Annex XVII to the REACH Regulation (Regulation No 1907/2006), imposes strict restrictions on substances used in tattoo inks and permanent makeup, which they argue are detrimental to their profession.

Key Arguments in the Case

The case is built on three primary legal pleas:

  1. Failure to Assess Health Effects: The applicants argue that the European Commission failed to conduct a thorough assessment of the health effects associated with the restricted substances. They claim that the regulation is based on speculative reports that merely suggest unknown risks of cancer without any solid epidemiological studies to support a direct cause-and-effect relationship between tattoos and cancer. Additionally, they assert that there is no scientific evidence demonstrating the migration of nanoparticles within the body or their short-to-medium-term effects.
  2. Infringement of the Principle of Equality: The plaintiffs highlight what they perceive as unequal treatment under the regulation. Specifically, while tattoo artists are prohibited from using 27 pigments, healthcare professionals who use the same products are not subjected to these restrictions. This discrepancy, they argue, is a clear violation of the principle of equality.
  3. Infringement of the Freedom to Conduct a Business: The applicants also contend that the regulation infringes on their fundamental right to conduct their business freely. They claim that the restrictions imposed by the regulation are disproportionate and unjustified, leading to significant financial and material losses, including the obsolescence of equipment and damage to their professional reputation.

Relief Sought

The Syndicat National des Artistes Tatoueurs and Auville are seeking €30,000 in compensation for financial damage, €10,000 for material damage, and €10,000 for non-pecuniary damage. Additionally, they are asking the court to either exclude the applicability of the regulation, declare it unlawful, or take appropriate measures to address its alleged unlawful nature. They also request that the European Commission be ordered to cover €5,000 in legal costs.

This case highlights the growing tensions between regulatory bodies and industry professionals as the EU continues to enforce stringent health and safety regulations. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the tattoo industry across Europe, potentially setting a precedent for how similar regulations are challenged and interpreted in the future.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Paint coatingsReport Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

May 9, 2025

Automotive chrome platingEU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

May 2, 2025

Industrial coatingRegulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

April 17, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Paint coatings

Report Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

ECHA flags methylenedianilines for potential restrictions in EU due to health and environmental risks; industry urged to monitor developments.

9

May 2025

REACH
Automotive chrome plating

EU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

The EU's proposed Chromium(VI) restriction could reshape REACH compliance and exposure controls across industry. Learn what it means for your business.

2

May 2025

REACH
Industrial coating

Regulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

ECHA proposes compliance checks and future restrictions for amine-terminated aliphatic ethers. Understand how this affects your regulatory obligations.

17

Apr 2025

REACH
CLP
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy