PPWR self-assessment

Start now

India Recommends Five-Year Extension Of China Sodium Hydrosulphite Anti-Dumping Duty

Dr Steven Brennan
Dr Steven Brennan
3 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed
Chemical drums and equipment in a textile-processing facility

Key takeaway

What This Development Means

India's Directorate General of Trade Remedies has recommended extending the anti-dumping duty on Chinese sodium hydrosulphite at USD 440 per metric tonne for five years. This is a final recommendation, not yet an implementing customs measure. Importers and downstream manufacturers should monitor the Ministry of Finance decision before the existing duty expires.

Is the five-year extension already in force?

No. The Directorate General of Trade Remedies has issued a final recommendation. The Central Government must adopt an implementing notification for the extended duty to apply. The current duty remains scheduled to expire on 16 December 2026.

Does the recommendation still cover South Korean goods?

No. The review recommendation is limited to China. The authority did not continue the Korean part because imports had ceased and the evidence did not establish a likelihood of renewed dumping or injury from the Republic of Korea.

Source basis: DGTR final finding AD (SSR)-06/2026

The India sodium hydrosulphite anti-dumping duty should continue for another five years at USD 440 per metric tonne, according to a final sunset-review recommendation from the Directorate General of Trade Remedies. The final finding in case AD (SSR)-06/2026 is dated 15 September and was published on the authority's website on 23 September 2026.

The recommendation is not yet an extended customs duty. The Central Government, acting through the Ministry of Finance, must issue a notification before the proposed measure becomes operative. The existing duty under Notification No. 71/2021-Customs (ADD) is scheduled to expire on 16 December 2026 unless renewed.

The product scope covers sodium hydrosulphite produced through zinc or sodium formate processes, including hydrosulphite concentrate, sodium dithionite, sodium hydrosulfite and SHS. Its chemical formula is Na2S2O4. Imports are reported under tariff codes 2831 1010 and 2832 1020, but the written product description governs coverage.

China Remains In Scope While Korea Falls Away

The proposed USD 440 per metric tonne duty covers subject goods originating in China and exported from any country, as well as subject goods originating elsewhere but exported from China. The duty table is designed to address both direct shipments and relevant routed exports.

The review does not continue measures against the Republic of Korea. The authority found that Korean imports had ceased and did not establish a likelihood of recurrence from that country. Businesses should therefore avoid describing the recommendation as applying to both countries covered by earlier proceedings.

The authority found that the domestic industry was not currently suffering material injury while the duty remained in place. It nevertheless concluded that dumped and injurious imports from China were likely to recur if the measure expired. The final finding states that 99% of Chinese exports to third countries were dumped, 98% were at injurious prices and 95% were below Indian prices.

Sodium hydrosulphite is used as a reducing and bleaching agent in textiles, pulp, paper, sugar, molasses, glue and kaolin, and in pharmaceuticals, polymers and oxygen-scavenging applications. The authority estimated that the recommended duty would add about 0.17% to cotton costs, 0.31% to denim and sugar, 1.11% to cefaclor, 0.13% to cotrimoxazole and similarly limited proportions for other sampled downstream products.

Planning Before The Government Decision

Importers and downstream users should map Chinese-origin purchases, verify product descriptions and origin routes, and model the USD 440 per metric tonne scenario. Contracts extending beyond 16 December should allocate responsibility for any continued duty. Procurement teams should also check domestic availability and alternative sources without assuming that a recommendation guarantees implementation.

The timing gap between recommendation and notification matters for procurement. Treating the proposed extension as already effective misstates the law, but ignoring it could leave year-end shipments commercially exposed if the government acts before the current measure lapses.

Get weekly regulatory updates:

Related Articles

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly for expert-picked regulatory developments across chemicals, sustainability, product safety, ESG, and HSE.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX