PPWR self-assessment

Start now

China Consults On Industrial Water Quotas For Sulphuric Acid Production

Dr Steven Brennan
Dr Steven Brennan
3 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed
Cooling-water pipes and process equipment at a chemical plant

Key takeaway

What This Development Means

China is consulting on a recommended national standard that would replace the 2017 water-withdrawal quota for industrial sulphuric acid. The draft sets route-specific Level 1 and Level 2 quotas, a non-conventional-water coefficient and full metering expectations. It excludes the Yellow River Basin areas governed by mandatory GB 45669.8-2026.

Are the proposed sulphuric acid water quotas legally binding?

Not by themselves. The project is for a recommended GB/T national standard and remains under consultation. Existing GB/T 18916.28-2017 stays current until replacement, while mandatory GB 45669.8-2026 governs the specified Yellow River areas.

When would the new quotas apply?

The draft proposes Level 2 for existing enterprises from the thirteenth month after publication and Level 1 for new or qualifying upgraded capacity. The final text and publication notice must be checked because the project page says implementation on publication.

Source basis: SAMR national standard project 20264279-T-469, issued 28 August 2026; consultation draft completed 3 September 2026

China Sulphuric Acid Water Quotas Move To Consultation

China is consulting on revised industrial water quotas for sulphuric acid production. National standard project 20264279-T-469 was issued on 28 August 2026 and the consultation draft was completed on 3 September. It is a proposed recommended national standard, not a mandatory GB standard or current law.

The proposal would replace GB/T 18916.28-2017 in full. It covers existing, new, reconstructed and expanded industrial sulphuric acid plants, with output expressed as 100% H2SO4 equivalent. Routes include sulphur, pyrite, non-ferrous smelting off-gas and gypsum.

The draft excludes the Yellow River Basin and county-level administrative areas supplied by Yellow River water. Those areas are governed by mandatory GB 45669.8-2026, so companies should not use the proposed national GB/T quotas as a substitute.

Route-Specific Thresholds Distinguish New And Existing Plants

For the sulphur route, Level 1 is 1.1 cubic metres per tonne and Level 2 is 2.7. For pyrite, the figures are 1.5 and 3.0. Smelting off-gas has limits of 1.3 and 2.6, while gypsum has limits of 3.7 and 4.3 cubic metres per tonne.

Level 1 is the advanced-efficiency benchmark and would govern new plants and reconstruction or expansion involving principal production water use. Level 2 would apply to existing enterprises from the thirteenth month after publication. The project page separately says implementation on publication. The draft’s more specific transitional wording should therefore be tracked through finalisation rather than treated as settled.

A coefficient of 0.8 applies to non-conventional water. Meter provision must reach 100% for principal and secondary water-using units. The calculation excludes non-recoverable water associated with external heat supply or net exported steam, waste-heat power generation water and company wastewater reused after industrial-park treatment. For smelting-gas production, it also excludes water used to treat low-concentration sulphur dioxide and collected fugitive gases arising from non-ferrous roasting, electrostatic dust removal and slag treatment.

What remains unchanged is GB/T 18916.28-2017 until a replacement is published. No official consultation closing date is stated, and the six-month project cycle is not a response deadline. The project title calls the proposal Part 34, but the draft series introduction identifies sulphuric acid as Part 17. This appears to be a drafting inconsistency and should not be silently resolved.

Manufacturers should calculate current water use by production route, separate excluded flows and test Level 1 and Level 2 performance. Importers and customers may not have direct duties, but could see water-efficiency data enter supplier qualification and sustainability reporting. A recommended GB/T can still shape permits, benchmarking and procurement even when it is not itself compulsory.

Get weekly regulatory updates:

Related Articles

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly for expert-picked regulatory developments across chemicals, sustainability, product safety, ESG, and HSE.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX