Short answer
Foresight preserves source evidence by keeping source context attached to alerts: source identity, links or document references, extracted facts, citations, and review context where available. This helps teams verify summaries, maintain an audit trail, and explain why a signal was raised.
Why Evidence Stays Attached
Regulatory summaries are only useful if the team can verify them. Keeping source evidence near the alert reduces rework and improves trust.
It also helps reviewers understand whether an output is a source fact, a system classification, or an interpretation.
What Reviewers Should See
Reviewers should be able to inspect the source, the extracted facts, the relevance reason, and the decision history around the alert.
That visibility is especially important when AI is involved in extraction or drafting.
Frequently asked questions
Is source evidence shown for every alert?
Foresight is designed around source-backed alerts. The exact evidence available can depend on the source and workflow.
Why does this matter for AI?
AI outputs need evidence because reviewers must be able to check whether the summary accurately reflects the source.
Related questions
What is source traceability in regulatory monitoring?
The evidence chain that lets a reviewer verify an alert.
Read moreWhy do citations matter in regulatory summaries?
A regulatory summary without citations is a claim asking to be trusted.
Read moreHow does Foresight monitor sources?
Foresight turns source monitoring into structured, reviewable alerts.
Read more