The European Parliament has backed proposals to simplify EU chemicals legislation under the “Chemicals Omnibus VI” package, aiming to reduce administrative burden while preserving high safety standards. The measures, approved on 15 April 2026 by key committees, will impact classification, labelling and packaging (CLP), cosmetics, and fertilisers across the chemicals value chain.
The initiative targets cost savings, regulatory clarity, and improved competitiveness, with the European Commission estimating at least €363 million in annual savings for industry.
Chemicals legislation simplification: CLP and labelling reforms
MEPs broadly support simplifying classification, labelling and packaging rules
but are resisting proposals that could weaken consumer safety. Labels must
remain legible, and suppliers should continue providing contact details,
including telephone numbers, to ensure traceability and emergency response. The
reforms introduce a stronger “digital-by-default” approach, allowing digital
contact points alongside physical labelling. However, hazard communication
remains central, with MEPs calling for mandatory hazard pictograms in
advertisements for hazardous substances. Importantly, most updated CLP
provisions are now scheduled to apply from 1 January 2028, giving companies
additional transition time.
Implications for supply chains and compliance
For manufacturers, importers, and downstream users, the proposed changes could
reduce labelling complexity and administrative workload. However, businesses
must prepare for hybrid labelling models combining physical and digital
information, as well as stricter advertising rules. Distributors and retailers,
especially in e-commerce, will need to ensure hazard information is clearly
communicated in online listings, reflecting expanded distance-selling
requirements.
Cosmetics regulation: tighter controls on hazardous substances
The proposal introduces stricter timelines for removing cosmetics containing
carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic (CMR) substances. MEPs want faster
phase-outs than those proposed by the Commission and reject exemptions based
solely on exposure routes such as inhalation or oral intake. New rules would
also require earlier notification of nanomaterials and clearer labelling for
online sales, ensuring ingredient transparency and consumer protection. These
changes will require reformulation strategies, updated safety assessments, and
closer monitoring of ingredient classifications across the cosmetics sector.
Fertiliser regulation: digitalisation and innovation focus
For fertilisers, the reform prioritises simplification for EU producers and
farmers while supporting innovation. Measures include digital documentation,
streamlined conformity assessments, and updated rules to accommodate new
materials such as microbial biostimulants. The shift aims to reduce barriers to
market entry and align regulatory requirements with scientific progress, without
compromising environmental or human health protections.
Strategic impact on competitiveness
The EU chemicals industry, comprising around 29,000 companies and supporting 19
million jobs, stands to benefit from reduced compliance costs and improved
regulatory coherence. However, stakeholders must balance simplification with
ongoing obligations under REACH, CLP, and sector-specific regulations,
particularly as digital tools and data requirements expand.
What happens next?
The European Parliament is expected to finalise its negotiating mandate during
the April 2026 plenary session, after which discussions with Member States will
begin.
ECHA's report highlights risks and regulatory gaps for aliphatic amines with ether substituents, calling for harmonised classification and targeted restrictions.
Parliament committees debated the Commission’s chemicals omnibus, weighing digital labelling savings against concerns over longer CMR transition timelines.