MEPs Debate Chemicals Omnibus Proposals In Joint IMCO–ENVI Meeting

Members of the European Parliament debated proposed amendments to EU chemicals legislation during a joint Internal Market (IMCO) and Environment (ENVI) committee meeting, focusing on changes to hazard communication under CLP, timelines for restrictions under the Cosmetic Products Regulation, and alignment issues for fertilising products. The discussion followed the Commission’s sixth “simplification omnibus”, framed as a burden-reduction package rather than deregulation.

Commission Frames The Package As Targeted Simplification

Representing the Commission, Hans Ingels said proposed changes to CLP labelling requirements could save businesses up to €333 million annually and reduce packaging waste. He also pointed to potential savings of around €19 million from aligning fertilising product rules with REACH-style registration requirements. The Commission argued the changes would preserve health and environmental protections, highlighting the existing scale of cosmetics prohibitions for carcinogenic, mutagenic or reprotoxic (CMR) substances.

Digital Labelling Gains Support, But Timelines Drive Concern

Several MEPs welcomed proposals to expand digital labelling options, citing multilingual labelling pressure and limited space on small or technical packaging. Rapporteurs also described amendments to allow more flexible label formatting, derogations for constrained packaging, and revised timelines for updating labels.

However, multiple speakers raised concerns about proposed transition timelines for removing newly classified carcinogens from cosmetics. European Parliament Vice-President Martin Hojsík argued the Commission proposal could extend the effective time to removal from around 1.5 years to nearly five years, with some parliamentary approaches pushing the timeline further. Critics also highlighted the absence of a full impact assessment and questioned whether longer timelines would weaken consumer protection.

What This Means For Manufacturers And Retailers

For businesses, the debate signals two parallel pressures. First, digital labelling is gaining political momentum, which could change how companies design labels, manage updates and maintain hazard information access. Second, cosmetics and other consumer product sectors may face uncertainty around transition periods, influencing reformulation strategy, stock management and how quickly products must reflect new classifications.