News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

ECCA Challenges General Court's Decision on Plant Protection Products

PPP
26
February 2024
•
290
Dr Steven Brennan
The challenge is based on several legal grounds, highlighting perceived misinterpretations and procedural errors in the original judgment.
Person spraying pesticides on plants
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The European Crop Care Association (ECCA) has initiated a legal challenge against a recent judgment of the General Court, marking a critical moment in the regulation of plant protection products within the European Union. This appeal, identified as Case C-773/23 P, disputes the findings of the General Court in the case involving Ascenza Agro and Industrias Afrasa against the Commission.

Background of the Appeal

The appeal stems from the General Court's October 4, 2023, decision, which was a significant ruling on the standards for marketing plant protection products in the EU. The ECCA, representing entities involved in the production and distribution of these products, questions the legal interpretations and applications that underpinned the court's judgment.

Legal Grounds for the Appeal

The ECCA's challenge is based on several legal grounds, highlighting perceived misinterpretations and procedural errors in the original judgment:

  • Questioning the Read-Across Approach: The appeal criticizes the General Court's endorsement of the read-across and weight of evidence method for assessing product safety, arguing it lacks a clear legal basis under Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
  • Article 296 TFEU Compliance: The ECCA contends that the judgment did not adhere to the transparency and clarity requirements mandated by Article 296 TFEU.
  • Procedural Concerns: The appeal raises issues regarding the procedural rigor of the General Court's decision-making process.
  • Consistency in Judgment: Allegations of contradictions and inconsistencies in applying the read-across method are also put forward, questioning the judgment's reliability.

Implications of the Appeal

The ECCA seeks to overturn the contested regulation and requests that the European Commission be held responsible for the legal costs associated with both the initial proceedings and the current appeal. This case highlights the ongoing tension between ensuring safety and environmental standards and promoting innovation within the EU's agricultural sector.

Read the source story

The European Crop Care Association (ECCA) has initiated a legal challenge against a recent judgment of the General Court, marking a critical moment in the regulation of plant protection products within the European Union. This appeal, identified as Case C-773/23 P, disputes the findings of the General Court in the case involving Ascenza Agro and Industrias Afrasa against the Commission.

Background of the Appeal

The appeal stems from the General Court's October 4, 2023, decision, which was a significant ruling on the standards for marketing plant protection products in the EU. The ECCA, representing entities involved in the production and distribution of these products, questions the legal interpretations and applications that underpinned the court's judgment.

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Coffee plant growingEU Sets New MRLs for Fluxapyroxad, Lambda-Cyhalothrin, Metalaxyl, and Nicotine in Food

January 26, 2025

BeesEuropean Commission's Appeal on EFSA Guidance Document Access Denied

January 16, 2025

Tractor spraying pesticidesGerman Agriculture Group Challenges EU Decision on Fluopyram Approval Extension

January 16, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Coffee plant growing

EU Sets New MRLs for Fluxapyroxad, Lambda-Cyhalothrin, Metalaxyl, and Nicotine in Food

Learn about the EU's new regulation setting maximum residue levels for fluxapyroxad, lambda-cyhalothrin, metalaxyl, and nicotine in food products.

26

Jan 2025

PPP
Bees

European Commission's Appeal on EFSA Guidance Document Access Denied

EU Court dismisses Commission's appeal, ensuring public access to EFSA's plant protection guidance.

16

Jan 2025

PPP
Tractor spraying pesticides

German Agriculture Group Challenges EU Decision on Fluopyram Approval Extension

German agriculture alliance challenges EU decision on Fluopyram approval extension, citing regulatory violations and health risks.

16

Jan 2025

PPP
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy