News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactBook DemoLog in
Start free trial
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

Industry Leaders Urge Immediate Action on PFAS Restriction Amidst Economic Fears

REACH
11
September 2024
•
3 min read
Dr Steven Brennan
Industry associations believe that the PFAS restriction proposal has caused planning uncertainties, product discontinuations, and disrupted supply chains.
Fluoropolymers
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

Germany's leading industrial associations are calling for urgent government intervention to revise the current PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) restriction process under the European Union's REACH regulation. In a strongly worded letter addressed to Chancellor Olaf Scholz, industry representatives warned of the severe economic consequences tied to the current approach, emphasising the need for a risk-based regulatory framework.

The letter, signed by prominent industry groups such as BDI, SPECTARIS, VDMA, and ZVEI, highlights the far-reaching impact of PFAS restrictions not only on the chemical industry but also on the production and availability of high-tech products throughout Europe. Industry leaders acknowledge the risks posed by certain PFAS compounds but argue that a more targeted, risk-based approach is essential for safeguarding Germany’s and Europe’s competitive edge.

Economic Uncertainty and Industry Disruptions

The ongoing PFAS restriction proposal has already led to significant planning uncertainties, halting investments, product discontinuations, and supply chain disruptions. The signatories fear that entire sectors could be lost if the regulatory approach does not shift towards assessing risks on a case-by-case basis.

According to the letter, the restriction process, as it stands, fails to differentiate between high-risk and low-risk PFAS applications. For example, the inclusion of fluoropolymers—used extensively in high-tech industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, and medical technology—has drawn particular concern. These polymers, which are essential to numerous technological advancements, are not toxic or bio accumulative, and their outright ban could severely hinder progress in critical sectors, including climate protection and technological sovereignty.

Calls for a Risk-Based Approach

The industrial associations propose a three-point action plan, urging the government to:

  1. Hold a PFAS summit: Establish a continuous dialogue on chemical regulation with manufacturers, particularly those involved in high-tech applications. This would include sectors such as aerospace, defence, and medical technology.
  2. Withdraw and revise the current restriction dossier: The letter calls for the temporary withdrawal and re-submission of the restriction proposal, aligning with a risk-based approach that prioritises regulating truly hazardous PFAS compounds.
  3. Exclude fluoropolymers from restrictions: Fluoropolymers, which pose minimal risk during their usage phase, should be excluded from the restriction list. Targeted regulatory measures should instead focus on emissions and waste management during their production and disposal phases.

Strategic Impact on Germany’s Technological Leadership

The letter emphasises the strategic implications of the PFAS restrictions for Germany’s technological leadership in areas like semiconductor manufacturing, digitalisation, and the green transition. A blanket ban on PFAS compounds, without consideration of their specific risks, threatens to undermine decades of progress in these fields, potentially driving production out of Europe.

The industrial associations also voiced concerns over the lengthy decision-making process, which has already affected supply chains and halted investments. They argue that delays in regulatory clarity exacerbate the risk of losing key technological capabilities to non-European competitors.

Overview

Germany, as a co-initiator of the PFAS restriction proposal, holds a pivotal role in shaping its outcome. The industrial associations are calling on the government to act swiftly, urging a balanced approach that prioritises risk-based regulation while safeguarding the country’s economic and technological interests. Failure to address these concerns, they warn, could result in irreversible damage to Germany's high-tech industries and its global competitiveness.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Automotive IndustryECHA Adds Three Hazardous Chemicals to REACH Candidate List, Triggering New Compliance Duties

June 26, 2025

CosmeticsMSC Confirms SVHC Status for Key Siloxanes

June 20, 2025

Defence weaponsEU Proposes to Expand REACH Defence Exemptions to Accelerate Readiness

June 20, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Automotive Industry

ECHA Adds Three Hazardous Chemicals to REACH Candidate List, Triggering New Compliance Duties

ECHA adds hazardous chemicals to the REACH Candidate List, introducing new legal duties for manufacturers and suppliers across the EU and EEA.

26

Jun 2025

REACH
Cosmetics

MSC Confirms SVHC Status for Key Siloxanes

MSC identifies new SVHCs under REACH, signalling fresh compliance obligations and risk management needs for chemicals professionals.

20

Jun 2025

REACH
Defence weapons

EU Proposes to Expand REACH Defence Exemptions to Accelerate Readiness

The EU proposes expanded REACH defence exemptions to fast-track chemical regulatory processes vital to defence readiness and industry compliance.

20

Jun 2025

REACH
POPs
CLP
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy