European Economic AreaNorthern IrelandREACH

ECHA Updates Progress On PFAS Restriction Proposal

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has announced significant progress in evaluating the EU-wide proposal to restrict per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). In June, the Committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) provisionally assessed the impacts of the proposal across sectors such as consumer mixtures, cosmetics, ski wax, and metal plating. The primary concern is the persistence of PFAS in the environment, posing long-term risks. Upcoming evaluations in September will focus on textiles, upholstery, leather, apparel, carpets, food contact materials, packaging, and petroleum and mining. The final opinions will be submitted to the European Commission once the comprehensive evaluation is complete.

Published in July 2024. Dates, deadlines and stages may have changed since.

Dr Steven Brennan

2 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed

Woman inspecting textiles

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has announced significant progress in the evaluation of the EU-wide proposal to restrict per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). During their June meetings, the Committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) provisionally concluded on the impacts of the proposal across four key sectors.

The June discussions, building on the March plenary, have provisionally assessed the following sectors:

Consumer mixtures, cosmetics, and ski waxMetal plating and the manufacture of metal products

The primary concern highlighted by RAC regarding PFAS is their persistence in the environment. PFAS are notorious for their durability, posing long-term environmental risks. Additionally, some PFAS are potentially hazardous to both the environment and human health. The committee also expressed scepticism about excluding certain PFAS from the restriction scope based on their potential environmental degradation, deeming the justification insufficient.

These conclusions remain provisional until the comprehensive evaluation of the restriction proposal, encompassing all sectors of use, is completed. Once finalised, the opinions of RAC and SEAC will be publicly communicated.

Looking ahead, the committees have outlined the sectors to be evaluated in their upcoming meetings. In September, the focus will shift to:

Textiles, upholstery, leather, apparel, and carpets (TULAC)Food contact materials and packagingPetroleum and mining

Following the September evaluations, discussions will move to:

Applications of fluorinated gasesTransportConstruction products

ECHA is committed to advancing the opinion-making process expeditiously, incorporating updates from the five national authorities involved in the proposal. The final opinions will be submitted to the European Commission at the earliest opportunity.

These efforts reflect ECHA's dedication to addressing the environmental and health risks posed by PFAS, ensuring informed decision-making for the benefit of EU citizens and the environment.

Questions about this change

What are the primary concerns highlighted by the Committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) regarding PFAS?

The primary concerns highlighted by the Committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) regarding PFAS are their persistence in the environment and the long-term environmental risks they pose. Additionally, some PFAS are potentially hazardous to both the environment and human health. RAC also expressed scepticism about excluding certain PFAS from the restriction scope based on their potential environmental degradation.

Which sectors will be the focus of ECHA’s evaluations in the upcoming meetings in September?

In the upcoming meetings in September, ECHA’s evaluations will focus on the following sectors:• Textiles, upholstery, leather, apparel, and carpets (TULAC)• Food contact materials and packaging• Petroleum and miningThese evaluations will further the understanding of the impacts of PFAS restrictions in these key sectors.

Dr Steven Brennan

CEO and co-founder of Foresight, and a co-opted member of ECHA's Committee for Socio-economic Analysis. He holds a PhD in chemical engineering.

More from Dr Steven Brennan

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Foresight Weekly brings the week's regulatory changes across chemicals, product safety, sustainability, ESG and EHS into one email.

Free. Unsubscribe at any time.

Read by professionals at

  • Boeing
  • AstraZeneca
  • Siemens
  • PepsiCo
  • SpaceX