
Revised EU Data Rules Set to Reshape Active Substance Approvals for Plant Protection Products
The EU is updating data requirements for active substances in plant protection products, raising safety standards and regulatory expectations.


The European Commission's appeal to restrict access to documents related to the European Food Safety Authority's (EFSA) 2013 guidance on plant protection products has been dismissed by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). This decision, delivered on 16 January 2025, marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over transparency and public access to EU documents.
The case originated from a request by Pollinis France, an environmental NGO, seeking access to documents concerning the EFSA's guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees. The Commission had initially refused access, citing the protection of its decision-making process under Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001. However, the General Court annulled this decision, leading to the Commission's appeal.
The CJEU upheld the General Court's decision, emphasising the importance of transparency in EU institutions. The Court noted that the Commission's decision-making process was not ongoing at the time of the request, as the revision of the guidance document was still pending. Therefore, the exception to public access was not applicable.
This ruling reinforces the principle of openness within the EU, as outlined in Regulation No 1049/2001, which aims to provide the public with the widest possible access to documents. The decision highlights the need for EU institutions to justify any refusal of access with specific and foreseeable risks to their decision-making processes.
The EFSA's guidance document is crucial for evaluating plant protection products, particularly concerning their impact on bees. This decision ensures that stakeholders, including environmental groups and the public, have access to information that could influence the regulation and use of such chemicals.
The Commission's discretion in adopting or amending guidance documents remains, but this case sets a precedent for how transparency and public interest are balanced against institutional confidentiality. The decision may prompt a review of how EU bodies handle document access requests, especially those related to environmental and public health matters.
Foresight continuously tracks 1000s of sources and maps updates to your portfolio:




The EU is updating data requirements for active substances in plant protection products, raising safety standards and regulatory expectations.

Germany's CONMAR-Impact study sets new environmental quality standards for TNT in marine ecosystems, raising industry-wide compliance questions.

EFSA finds limited evidence of microplastic release from food contact materials, citing mechanical stress as the main mechanism and calling for improved methodologies.
Subscribe to Foresight Weekly and get the latest insights on regulatory changes affecting chemical compliance.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.
Read by professionals at