
California Advances Permanent SB 54 Regulations To Drive Packaging Reform
California proposes permanent SB 54 packaging rules requiring recyclability or compostability by 2032, redefining producer responsibility across the supply chain.

Key takeaway
The WEEE Directive revision debate is moving beyond recycling towards prevention, reuse, critical raw material recovery and stronger producer responsibility. If adopted, these changes could reshape compliance duties across electronics, chemicals, retail, recycling and online marketplaces, while supporting Europe’s circular economy and resource security goals.
The WEEE Directive revision is the EU’s review of rules governing waste electrical and electronic equipment. It could update requirements on collection, recycling, reuse, repair, producer responsibility and critical raw material recovery. NGOs are calling for the directive to become a more harmonised EU regulation.
Chemicals companies may be affected because electronics contain polymers, coatings, flame retardants, metals and hazardous substances. Stricter WEEE rules could increase demand for safer material choices, better product data, improved recyclability and stronger documentation across supply chains.
Source basis: EEB, RREUSE, Right to Repair Europe, ECOS and Zero Waste Europe joint position paper, 19 May 2026
The WEEE Directive revision should become a new EU regulation with tougher rules on waste prevention, reuse, recycled content, critical raw materials and producer responsibility, according to a joint NGO position paper published in May 2026. The proposals could affect electronics manufacturers, chemical suppliers, recyclers, retailers, online platforms and downstream users across the European electrical and electronic equipment value chain.
The paper, backed by organisations including the European Environmental Bureau, RREUSE, Right to Repair Europe, ECOS and Zero Waste Europe, argues that the current Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive is no longer fit for purpose. It says more than 14.4 million tonnes of electrical and electronic equipment were sold in the EU in 2023, up by more than 89% since 2012.
The NGOs want binding waste prevention targets and separate targets for reuse, preparation for reuse and recycling. They argue that combining reuse and recycling targets can push funding towards cheaper recycling routes rather than repair and reuse. The paper also calls for better collection systems, mandatory sorting that prioritises reuse, and priority access to collected devices for accredited reuse operators, including social economy organisations.
For manufacturers and retailers, this could increase pressure to design products that last longer, are easier to repair and can be safely handled at end of life.
The WEEE Directive revision is also framed as a resource security measure. Waste electronics contain critical raw materials, but the paper says this potential remains largely underused in Europe. The NGOs recommend material-specific recycled content targets from post-consumer WEEE, improved data on critical raw material content through Digital Product Passports, labelling of CRM-rich components and treatment rules that improve dismantling and recovery.
This would have implications for electronics brands, recyclers, battery and component suppliers, and chemical companies involved in metals recovery, flame retardants, coatings or polymer systems used in electronic goods.
The position paper calls for a broad overhaul of extended producer responsibility. This includes harmonised EU rules, stronger cost coverage, eco-modulated producer fees and action against free-riding by online sellers. For compliance teams, the direction is clear: product design, chemical content, repairability, take-back, recycling data and online sales obligations are becoming increasingly connected. A useful next step is to review EEE product portfolios against repairability, material traceability and WEEE reporting requirements before the European Commission advances its legislative proposal.
The WEEE Directive revision debate is moving beyond recycling towards prevention, reuse, critical raw material recovery and stronger producer responsibility. If adopted, these changes could reshape compliance duties across electronics, chemicals, retail, recycling and online marketplaces, while supporting Europe’s circular economy and resource security goals.




California proposes permanent SB 54 packaging rules requiring recyclability or compostability by 2032, redefining producer responsibility across the supply chain.

The EU will not reopen REACH, focusing instead on simplification and enforcement while advancing PFAS restrictions and circular economy policies. This approach offers regulatory stability but increases pressure on hazardous substances and resource efficiency across the chemicals value chain.

Member States urge rapid EU measures to stabilise the plastics recycling sector, boost demand for recyclate, and address unfair competition.
Subscribe to Foresight Weekly for expert-picked regulatory developments across chemicals, sustainability, product safety, ESG, and HSE.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.
Read by professionals at