EPA Proposes New Safety Regulations for C.I. Pigment Violet 29 to Protect Workers from Health Risks

Dr Steven Brennan
Dr Steven Brennan
3 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed
Car manufacturing

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a proposed rule to address the health risks associated with C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (PV29), a chemical used in industrial applications such as paints, coatings, and printing inks. The regulation, revealed in December 2024, aims to mitigate the chemical’s lung toxicity risks through mandatory workplace protections, including respiratory gear and equipment cleaning protocols.

Key Insights

Understanding the Proposed Rule

Why C.I. Pigment Violet 29 is Under Scrutiny

C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (PV29) is a perylene-based pigment recognised for its durability and stability in automotive paints, plastics, and industrial coatings. However, EPA’s 2021 risk evaluation identified potential lung toxicity from inhalation of its dry powder form, posing an unreasonable risk to workers.

Proposed Worker Protection Measures

To address these risks, the EPA's proposed rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) introduces several key safety requirements:

  • Respiratory Protection: Employers must provide APF 50 respirators to workers exposed to PV29 in its dry powder form.
  • Cleaning Protocols: Equipment and work areas where PV29 is handled must be cleaned within 24 hours of use to prevent residue accumulation.
  • Regulated Work Zones: Facilities must designate specific areas where PV29 is handled, with clear demarcations to control access.

Stakeholder Engagement and Feedback

Public Comment Opportunities

The EPA is encouraging feedback from businesses, workers, and other stakeholders. Comments can be submitted for 45 days following the rule's publication in the Federal Register. Specific input on compliance feasibility and the effectiveness of proposed measures is being sought.

Impact on Small Businesses

To minimise the economic burden on small entities, EPA convened a Small Business Advocacy Review panel. Recommendations included tailoring requirements for entities not handling dry powder PV29 and allowing sufficient compliance timelines.

Economic and Health Implications

Costs of Compliance

The EPA estimates the annual compliance cost to range from $1.6 million to $1.7 million over 15 years, largely due to expenses for personal protective equipment (PPE), cleaning supplies, and worker training.

Health Benefits

The proposed rule aims to reduce chronic lung diseases linked to PV29 exposure, such as bronchitis. The monetised benefits of preventing such conditions are projected at $271,000 to $629,000 annually.

Future Directions

The EPA’s proposed rule underscores its commitment to worker safety while ensuring that industrial applications of PV29 can continue responsibly. Stakeholders are encouraged to provide insights that could shape the final regulation.

Access the original source

Foresight continuously tracks 1000s of sources and maps updates to your portfolio:

  • Get alerted when changes affect your products or operations
  • Access source documents with full citations
  • Collaborate with your team on alerts and decisions

Related Articles

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly and get the latest insights on regulatory changes affecting chemical compliance.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX