News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

EPA Enforcement Actions at Facilities in Arizona, California, and Nevada Address Chemical Safety Deficiencies

CAA
28
May 2024
•
420
Dr Steven Brennan
The Clean Air Act mandates that facilities using extremely hazardous substances must develop and implement risk management plans.
Industrial steam released from factory
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced a series of enforcement actions to address deficiencies in safety plans at eight facilities in Arizona, California, and Nevada that store or use hazardous chemicals. The Clean Air Act mandates that facilities using extremely hazardous substances must develop and implement risk management plans. These plans should outline the potential effects of a chemical accident, preventive measures, and emergency response procedures.

“It’s imperative to the safety of local communities and emergency responders – and it’s the law – that facilities with flammable and toxic chemicals act to prevent accidents and to have proper response procedures in place,” said EPA Pacific Southwest Regional Administrator Martha Guzman. “These enforcement actions represent EPA’s commitment to holding accountable facilities that have failed to follow our nation’s critical chemical safety laws.”

Significant Case in Northern California

At the K2 Pure Solutions Nocal facility in Pittsburg, California, which manufactures bleach, chlorine, and hydrochloric acid, the EPA discovered significant safety issues during a 2020 investigation. The issues included incomplete documentation of the facility’s pressure relief system, failure to timely address safety recommendations, and inadequate procedures for testing emergency response equipment.

In August 2021, the EPA ordered the facility to rectify these deficiencies. By April 2024, K2 had addressed most issues. The EPA reached a settlement requiring K2 to pay an $85,189 civil penalty and address the remaining deficiencies, including:

  • Replacing instruments in an electrical hazardous area;
  • Moving a chlorine pressure relief device discharge location to a safe location;
  • Completing and implementing the results of a safety study on discharge locations for a dozen safety pressure relief devices;
  • Addressing safety recommendations from recent process hazards analyses;
  • Updating leak repair procedures;
  • Certifying that all critical interlocks and instruments testing is current.

Under the agreement, K2 will also provide Contra Costa Health Services with emergency response resources through a supplemental environmental project (SEP). The SEP includes $264,990 in emergency response equipment, such as devices for detecting, identifying, and quantifying toxic industrial chemicals, and $98,041 for chlorine emergency response training. These projects will supply local responders near the K2 facility with essential equipment and training.

Penalties for Late Risk Management Plans

The EPA also assessed penalties to several facilities for late submission of Risk Management Plans (RMPs):

  • Tolleson Dairy (Tolleson, Ariz.): $2,000 penalty; the facility, owned by Kroger Company, processes milk and uses anhydrous ammonia.
  • Holcim Solutions and Products US, LLC (Garden Grove, Calif.): $2,000 penalty; the facility manufactures paint and coatings and uses toluene diisocyanate.
  • North Brawley Geothermal Project (Brawley, Calif.): $1,600 penalty; the facility is a geothermal electric power plant using isopentane.
  • City of Pasadena Water and Power (Pasadena, Calif.): $2,000 penalty; the facility is a water treatment plant that uses chlorine.
  • Hazen Nevada Terminal (Hazen, Nev.): $1,600 penalty; the facility is a petroleum bulk terminal owned by South 49 Holdings that stores propane.
  • Carlin Nevada Terminal (Carlin, Nev.): $1,600 penalty; another petroleum bulk terminal owned by South 49 Holdings storing propane.
  • PPG Reno DC (McCarran, Nev.): $2,000 penalty; a chemical distribution center that stores flammable products.

These enforcement actions underline the EPA's commitment to ensuring chemical safety and compliance with national safety laws to protect both communities and emergency responders.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Chemical manufacturing plantEPA Proposes Stricter Emission Standards for Polyether Polyols Industry to Reduce Hazardous Pollutants

January 16, 2025

Woman in a testing labEPA Report Highlights Flexibility in Reducing Animal Testing with NAMs

October 8, 2024

Steam leaving a chemical plantCompanies Pay $1mn Civil Penalties in Alleged Violation of Clean Air Act

July 15, 2024

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Chemical manufacturing plant

EPA Proposes Stricter Emission Standards for Polyether Polyols Industry to Reduce Hazardous Pollutants

The EPA proposes updated emission standards for the polyether polyols industry, aiming to cut hazardous pollutants like ethylene oxide and enhance public health protection.

16

Jan 2025

CAA
Woman in a testing lab

EPA Report Highlights Flexibility in Reducing Animal Testing with NAMs

EPA’s new report explores regulatory flexibility under TSCA, FIFRA, and other laws to reduce animal testing using New Approach Methods (NAMs).

8

Oct 2024

TSCA
FIFRA
CAA
Steam leaving a chemical plant

Companies Pay $1mn Civil Penalties in Alleged Violation of Clean Air Act

Additionally, the companies will upgrade equipment to cut emissions, perform regular compliance checks, and speed up leak repairs.

15

Jul 2024

CAA
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy