ECHA RAC Releases Scientific Evaluation on Occupational Exposure Limits for 1,3-Butadiene

Dr Steven Brennan
Dr Steven Brennan
3 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed
Workers

The European Chemicals Agency's Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) has released an evaluation of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for 1,3-butadiene, determining that no health-based limit can be established due to the compound's classification as a non-threshold carcinogen. Instead, RAC has derived an exposure-risk relationship to address the risk of cancer among exposed workers, reflecting findings that link 1,3-butadiene to increased cancer risks in the haematolymphatic system, particularly leukaemia.

Carcinogenicity of 1,3-Butadiene

The evaluation recognises 1,3-butadiene (1,3-BD) as a potent carcinogen, particularly affecting workers in industries involving synthetic rubber production. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified 1,3-BD as “carcinogenic to humans” based on occupational studies, animal models, and evidence of a genotoxic mechanism driven by reactive metabolites. Epidemiological data from studies in the US and Canada show an association between prolonged exposure to 1,3-BD in styrene-butadiene rubber manufacturing workers and increased rates of leukaemia​​.

No Health-Based OEL, but Cancer Exposure-Risk Relationship Established

Given 1,3-BD’s non-threshold carcinogenic nature, RAC found it impossible to establish a safe OEL for long-term occupational exposure. Instead, the committee proposed an exposure-risk relationship (ERR), which calculates an excess lifetime cancer risk based on 1,3-BD concentrations. According to the ERR, a workplace air concentration of 0.065 ppm of 1,3-BD corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of 4 cases per 100,000 workers over a 40-year exposure period​.

Critical Health Effects and Metabolic Differences

Although 1,3-BD poses significant cancer risks, RAC’s analysis also highlighted ovarian atrophy as a critical non-cancer effect in animal models. However, species-specific metabolic differences hinder establishing a direct human relevance. Studies showed that mice, in particular, displayed ovarian toxicity at relatively low concentrations, but the varied metabolism of 1,3-BD across species raises uncertainties for human risk assessment​.

Recommendations for Monitoring and Risk Management

RAC recommends biomonitoring for 1,3-BD exposure using specific urinary biomarkers like DHBMA and MHBMA in workplaces, especially where workers are also exposed to compounds such as chloroprene or smoke. However, RAC did not suggest a biological limit value (BLV) due to the limited data on baseline levels in the EU population and the influence of external factors like smoking​.

Groups at Extra Risk

The RAC’s evaluation identified particular groups at higher risk, including workers with certain genetic polymorphisms that increase sensitivity to 1,3-BD metabolites. Additionally, women of reproductive age may be at elevated risk due to the compound’s potential ovarian toxicity.

Access the original source

Foresight continuously tracks 1000s of sources and maps updates to your portfolio:

  • Get alerted when changes affect your products or operations
  • Access source documents with full citations
  • Collaborate with your team on alerts and decisions

Related Articles

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly and get the latest insights on regulatory changes affecting chemical compliance.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX