Key takeaway
What This Development Means
UBA’s MICROSOIL project urges a comprehensive update to soil microorganism risk assessments for agricultural chemicals, introducing new functional and structural tests. This shift could reshape regulatory compliance strategies, strengthen environmental safeguards, and better align chemical use with sustainability goals.
What is the main outcome of the MICROSOIL project?
The MICROSOIL project recommends adding bacterial function and fungal structure tests to chemical risk assessments, alongside developing community fingerprinting methods, to better capture the real-world impacts of pesticides, biocides, and veterinary pharmaceuticals on soil microorganisms.
Why is antibiotic resistance a concern in soil microorganism assessments?
Current veterinary pharmaceutical assessments may overlook the potential for antibiotic resistance to develop in soil bacteria. This poses environmental and public health risks, as resistant bacteria could transfer into food systems or water supplies, undermining antimicrobial effectiveness.
Source basis: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/correctly-assessing-the-performance-threats-of
The German Environment Agency (UBA) has called for significant updates to the risk assessment of soil microorganisms exposed to agricultural chemicals, including pesticides, biocides and veterinary pharmaceuticals. The recommendations follow the MICROSOIL project, which found that current testing methods fail to capture the full scope of risks, potentially overlooking impacts such as antibiotic resistance in soil bacteria.
Expanding The Risk Framework
The existing risk assessment for plant protection products (PPPs) relies heavily on the OECD 216 nitrogen turnover test. While useful, this laboratory method does not address all potential threats to the soil microbial community. The MICROSOIL project identified five alternative testing approaches through literature review and scoring, with subsequent laboratory trials across three soils and six test substances.
Key Recommendations
UBA experts propose adding:
- Bacterial function testing using ISO 20130 (enzymatic activity).
- Structural impact assessment for mycorrhizal fungi via ISO 10832.
- Community fingerprinting methods to evaluate broader changes in microbial structure, although these require further refinement.
The study also found that repeated chemical applications, and the presence of multiple substances, can either enhance or reduce microbial degradation capacity, underscoring the complexity of soil-chemical interactions.
Implications For Industry And Regulation
These findings have far-reaching implications for professionals across the manufacturing value chain, including agrochemical producers, regulatory bodies, and food supply chain stakeholders. The omission of antibiotic resistance assessment in current veterinary pharmaceutical testing is a particular concern, given its potential to affect both environmental health and human safety.
The proposed testing enhancements would improve the detection of sub-lethal and structural impacts, enabling more informed regulatory decisions and supporting sustainable soil management practices.
Related Articles
Draft EU End-Of-Waste Criteria Set New Conditions For Recycled Plastics
The Commission has notified draft EU end-of-waste criteria for recycled thermoplastics, with proposed quality, assurance and documentation conditions.
Draft EU Toy Chemical Restrictions Tighten Controls On Lilial, BPA, BIT And Phenol
Draft EU toy chemical restrictions would list Lilial, lower the BPA migration limit and update test references for BIT and phenol.
Machinery Harmonised Standards Recitation Planned Before January 2027
The Commission plans to re-cite most machinery harmonised standards in late 2026, but cyber-safety and AI standards remain outstanding.
