
ECHA Opens Consultation on Four Substances for REACH Annex XIV
A new ECHA consultation could pave the way for authorisation requirements for UV stabilisers, a flame retardant and a photoinitiator used across multiple sectors.

A Dutch REACH substance evaluation has concluded that a fluorinated phosphate reaction mass used in industrial and professional coatings degrades into perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) and perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA), both highly persistent PFAS. Published on 10 January 2025 for List No. 700-161-3, the decision closes the formal evaluation process but points to continued EU-level risk management pressure.
The Dutch competent authority confirmed that initial REACH concerns were justified, including persistent and very persistent behaviour linked to PFAS degradation products. The parent substance was assessed for potential PBT and vPvB concerns, and the evaluation identified PFHxA and PFHpA as the key degradation endpoints driving concern.
The conclusion also highlights PMT and vPvM concerns, meaning the relevant substances are not only persistent but also mobile in water systems. That combination increases the risk of broad environmental distribution across surface water, groundwater and distant regions, raising long-term exposure concerns beyond the original use sites.
The evaluation does not propose a new harmonised classification or immediate SVHC identification for the parent reaction mass. However, it explicitly links the substance to existing and developing EU measures, because its degradation profile connects it to PFHxA-related regulatory controls already in force since September 2024.
In parallel, the same chemistry is within scope of the broader EU PFAS restriction proposal being assessed through ECHA committee processes. For manufacturers, formulators, importers and downstream users, this outcome should be interpreted as a strong forward-looking compliance signal rather than a neutral closure of the dossier.
For coatings producers, construction supply chains and professional users, the conclusion increases pressure to review raw material portfolios and substitution roadmaps. Even lower-volume uses can create downstream liability where persistent PFAS degradation products are involved.
Waste operators and water utilities may also face indirect impacts as monitoring expectations tighten and regulators connect emissions, waste handling and water contamination pathways more directly to PFAS source materials.
The Dutch REACH conclusion confirms that this fluorinated phosphate mixture raises long-term environmental concerns because it degrades into persistent and mobile PFAS. While no new standalone control was adopted in the evaluation itself, the findings reinforce existing PFHxA restrictions and support the direction of travel towards broader EU PFAS limits.




A new ECHA consultation could pave the way for authorisation requirements for UV stabilisers, a flame retardant and a photoinitiator used across multiple sectors.

EU enforcement reveals compliance gaps in restricted substances for cosmetics, with PFAS and siloxanes under scrutiny.

Explore the CEO's report alleging corporate lobbying against EU PFAS restrictions. Discover the claims, implications, and calls for transparency.
Subscribe to Foresight Weekly and get the latest insights on regulatory changes affecting chemical compliance.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.
Read by professionals at