News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

EU Ombudsman Urges Swift Action on Delays in Dangerous Chemical Substances Risk Management

REACH
22
October 2024
•
450
Dr Steven Brennan
The EU Ombudsman recommends the European Commission speed up decisions on authorising dangerous chemical substances, citing serious delays.
Using chemicals in a lab
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

The European Ombudsman has urged the European Commission to address significant delays in its authorisation process for dangerous chemical substances under the REACH Regulation. Despite a statutory three-month deadline, the Commission is taking an average of 14.5 months, with some cases exceeding 54 months. These delays allow hazardous chemicals, which pose risks such as carcinogenicity and toxicity, to remain on the market without adequate oversight. The Ombudsman found this to be maladministration and recommended that the Commission streamline its internal procedures, reject incomplete applications, and improve transparency in the decision-making process. The Commission has been asked to provide a detailed response by January 2025.

What actions has the European Ombudsman recommended to address the Commission's delays?

The Ombudsman has recommended that the European Commission overhaul its internal processes to meet the statutory three-month deadline for decision-making on dangerous chemical substances. This includes promptly rejecting incomplete applications to prevent companies from using hazardous substances while awaiting decisions. Additionally, the Ombudsman urged for greater transparency in the process, including more detailed public reporting on the progress of each authorisation.

What transparency issues did the European Ombudsman identify in the Commission’s handling of dangerous substances?

The Ombudsman found that the European Commission lacks transparency in its decision-making process. The public has limited access to information on the progress of authorisations and the reasons for delays. To address this, the Ombudsman recommended that the Commission provide more detailed and timely reports from the REACH Committee meetings, allowing the public to track decisions and hold relevant parties accountable.

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The European Ombudsman has issued a recommendation urging the European Commission to address delays in its authorisation process for dangerous chemical substances under the REACH Regulation. Despite a statutory deadline of three months, the Commission has taken an average of 14.5 months—and in some cases, up to 54 months—to reach decisions, leading to extended use of hazardous chemicals in the EU.

Ombudsman’s Findings on Maladministration

The inquiry, opened in June 2023, found that the European Commission’s failure to meet statutory deadlines for processing applications to authorise the use of dangerous chemical substances constitutes maladministration. The substances in question pose significant risks, including carcinogenic, mutagenic, and toxic properties. The REACH Regulation mandates that companies applying for authorisation must submit detailed information to justify the continued use of these chemicals while their applications are pending. However, systemic delays mean that many of these hazardous substances remain on the market for extended periods, without adequate oversight or control.

Causes of Delays

The report highlights several reasons behind these delays. The Commission cited internal complexities, such as the involvement of two directorates-general—Environment (DG ENV) and Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (DG GROW)—in processing applications. Additional complications arise from the need to reconcile technical advice from expert committees and the need for broader political deliberations. In some cases, incomplete applications further slow down the process.

Moreover, the inquiry revealed that only 20% of authorisation procedures were completed within 12 months, while the remaining 80% took far longer. The Ombudsman expressed concern that such delays contradict the core aim of the REACH Regulation—to protect public health and the environment.

Calls for Transparency and Efficiency

The Ombudsman’s recommendation emphasises that the Commission must reorganise its procedures to ensure timely decisions and suggests rejecting incomplete applications to prevent companies from continuing to use dangerous substances. Furthermore, the Ombudsman has called for increased transparency, particularly around the workings of the REACH Committee, which approves the final decisions. The lack of publicly available information hampers public accountability and understanding of the reasons for delays.

Legal and Public Interest Implications

Two recent EU court cases underline the gravity of the issue. In both cases, the Commission’s authorisations were annulled due to inadequate consideration of risks or alternatives. The courts ruled that applicants bear the burden of proof and that incomplete applications should not be allowed to prolong the use of dangerous substances.

The Ombudsman’s recommendation could prompt significant changes in how the Commission handles chemical risk management. Ensuring compliance with the three-month statutory deadline is critical to fulfilling the regulation’s purpose: the timely phasing out of harmful chemicals.

The European Ombudsman’s intervention underscores the urgent need for the European Commission to streamline its authorisation process for dangerous chemical substances. Delays not only pose risks to public health and the environment but also undermine the credibility of the EU’s regulatory framework. The Commission has been urged to revise its procedures to enhance both efficiency and transparency, ensuring that hazardous substances are regulated with the urgency they demand.

The Ombudsman’s full recommendation is expected to influence future regulatory practices, with a detailed response from the Commission due by January 2025​​.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Paint coatingsReport Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

May 9, 2025

Automotive chrome platingEU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

May 2, 2025

Industrial coatingRegulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

April 17, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Paint coatings

Report Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

ECHA flags methylenedianilines for potential restrictions in EU due to health and environmental risks; industry urged to monitor developments.

9

May 2025

REACH
Automotive chrome plating

EU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

The EU's proposed Chromium(VI) restriction could reshape REACH compliance and exposure controls across industry. Learn what it means for your business.

2

May 2025

REACH
Industrial coating

Regulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

ECHA proposes compliance checks and future restrictions for amine-terminated aliphatic ethers. Understand how this affects your regulatory obligations.

17

Apr 2025

REACH
CLP
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy