The General Court of the European Union delivered a landmark judgment regarding the non-contractual liability case involving Symphony Environmental Technologies plc against the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and the European Commission. The case centred on the contention that the prohibition on oxo-degradable plastics under the Single Use Plastics Directive ((EU) 2019/904) constituted a serious breach of law, adversely affecting the plaintiffs' business operations.
Background to the Dispute
Symphony Environmental Technologies plc sought compensation for damages they allege were caused by the inclusion of oxo-degradable plastics in the Directive's prohibition, arguing that it did not differentiate between oxo-degradable and oxo-biodegradable plastics. This differentiation was crucial for the company, which specialises in the development, production, and marketing of plastic products incorporating an additive promoting abiotic and subsequent biodegradation.
The judgment detailed, "the prohibition on the placing on the market of products made from oxo-degradable plastic laid down in Article 5 and recital 15 applies to oxo-biodegradable plastic," highlighting the crux of the dispute.
Plastic Policy
The case underscored a significant debate on environmental policy, the scientific assessment of plastic biodegradability, and the impact of such materials on pollution and recycling processes. The court examined various legal and scientific aspects, including the principles of equal treatment, proportionality, and the precautionary principle enshrined in EU environmental policy.
The judge's rationale emphasised the importance of scientific evidence in assessing the environmental impact of oxo-degradable plastics, including their biodegradability and the potential for causing harm to the environment. The decision underlined the necessity of EU legislation to prevent pollution and protect the environment, balancing this with the rights and interests of businesses. The judgment sought to clarify the legal and scientific considerations underpinning the prohibition of oxo-degradable plastics, reaffirming the EU's commitment to sustainable environmental practices.
A Complex Picture
The court's decision illuminated the complexities of regulating environmentally harmful materials and the balance between environmental protection and the rights of businesses. It emphasized the necessity of a thorough scientific assessment in environmental legislation, reaffirming the EU's commitment to mitigating plastic pollution while ensuring legal and procedural fairness.
The judgment may prompt legislative reviews and potentially more refined regulations distinguishing between different types of biodegradable plastics, alongside further scientific research to inform future policy decisions.
