News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

EU Court Rules Against Evonik in Silanamine Classification Dispute

CLP
11
December 2024
•
300
Dr Steven Brennan
EU Court upholds silanamine's hazardous classification, rejecting Evonik’s legal challenge.
People in a meeting
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The General Court of the European Union has dismissed Evonik Operations GmbH's challenge to the European Commission's decision to classify silanamine, a synthetic silica compound, as a hazardous substance. The judgment, delivered on 27 November 2024, upheld the Commission's classification of silanamine in the "specific target organ toxicity-repeated exposure" (STOT RE) Category 2 hazard class.

EU Court Backs European Commission’s Decision

‍The Sixth Chamber of the General Court rejected Evonik's request to annul the European Commission's Delegated Regulation 2022/692, which harmonised the classification and labelling of silanamine. The regulation was adopted under the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, which governs the classification and labelling of chemical substances in the EU. The court ruled that the Commission’s classification of silanamine as hazardous was supported by robust scientific evidence and complied with procedural requirements.

The European Chemicals Agency's Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) provided evidence showing silanamine's potential to cause significant lung damage when inhaled repeatedly. The RAC's findings were based on a comprehensive review of experimental animal studies, which identified effects such as pulmonary inflammation, structural tissue damage, and impaired lung function.

Rejection of Procedural and Scientific Criticism

‍Evonik argued that the classification was flawed, alleging procedural errors, such as the absence of a public consultation specifically on the RAC’s opinion and the lack of an impact assessment. The General Court ruled that the Commission adhered to all applicable procedural rules. It clarified that the public consultation on the initial classification proposal fulfilled regulatory obligations and that the RAC acted within its remit to rely on a broad range of scientific evidence.

The court also dismissed claims that the classification criteria were not met. It concluded that the Commission did not commit any manifest error in assessing the risks associated with silanamine or in adopting the regulation.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Medicine on shelfEU Proposes Stricter Classification for Trifluoroacetic Acid under CLP Regulation

May 26, 2025

Industrial coatingRegulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

April 17, 2025

SpacecraftEU Advances PFAS Restriction and Chemical Reclassification

April 17, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Medicine on shelf

EU Proposes Stricter Classification for Trifluoroacetic Acid under CLP Regulation

EU proposes new classification for Trifluoroacetic Acid under CLP—affecting hazard labelling, compliance, and chemical safety strategies.

26

May 2025

CLP
Industrial coating

Regulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

ECHA proposes compliance checks and future restrictions for amine-terminated aliphatic ethers. Understand how this affects your regulatory obligations.

17

Apr 2025

REACH
CLP
Spacecraft

EU Advances PFAS Restriction and Chemical Reclassification

Upcoming PFAS restrictions and chemical reclassifications will impact manufacturing, transport, energy, medical devices, and electronics sectors.

17

Apr 2025

REACH
CLP
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy