News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

EPA Science Advisory Committee Reviews Formaldehyde Risk Evaluation

TSCA
9
August 2024
•
420
Dr Steven Brennan
The committee's recommendations aim to improve risk evaluation accuracy and reliability, enhancing health and environmental protection. The EPA will incorporate these insights.
People in a meeting
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released the meeting minutes and final report from the Science Advisory Committee on Chemicals (SACC) following a public virtual meeting held from 20-23 May 2024. The meeting focused on the peer review of the 2024 Draft Risk Evaluation for Formaldehyde. This evaluation is a significant step in assessing the risks associated with formaldehyde exposure and aims to enhance public health and environmental safety.

Background

Formaldehyde is a widely used chemical in various industries, but its potential health risks have been a concern for many years. The EPA's draft risk evaluation aims to assess these risks comprehensively. The SACC, established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), provides scientific advice to the EPA Administrator on chemicals and chemical-related issues.

Key Discussion Points

  1. Human Health Hazard
    • The human health hazard section of the evaluation focused on both acute and chronic non-cancer impacts of formaldehyde exposure. The committee emphasised the need for thorough documentation of key studies and a clear rationale for the points of departure (PODs) used in the risk assessment.
    • Sensory irritation as a POD for acute inhalation was a significant topic of debate. Some members questioned its validity as an adverse effect, while others noted its potential to impact normal functioning in occupational settings.
  2. Water and Land Pathway
    • The committee highlighted the importance of considering formaldehyde degradation products in the environmental risk assessment. They recommended robust monitoring data and model validation to ensure accurate exposure assessments.
    • Aggregate environmental exposure and probabilistic risk assessments were suggested to enhance understanding and management of formaldehyde's environmental impacts.
  3. Occupational Assessment
    • Detailed data on workers' tasks and movements were recommended to improve occupational exposure assessments. Integration of data from OSHA and other sources was also advised.
    • The committee stressed the need for a unified approach to both cancer and non-cancer effects in occupational settings, considering the best available science for dose-response evaluations.
  4. Consumer Assessment
    • The committee recommended conservative exposure estimates and expanded scenarios to better capture long-term and aggregate risks to consumers.
    • The inclusion of chronic exposure assessments and a more thorough discussion of uncertainties related to formaldehyde sources were suggested to enhance the robustness of the consumer risk evaluation.
  5. Indoor Air Assessment
    • Comprehensive evaluation of indoor sources of formaldehyde and the impact of recent emission standards were discussed. The committee supported ongoing monitoring to ensure regulatory measures are effective.
    • The importance of using existing data for exposure factors and applying probabilistic models to handle aggregated exposure scenarios was emphasised.
  6. Ambient Outdoor Air Assessment
    • The committee noted that indoor sources might pose a greater relative risk compared to industrial emissions. Enhanced environmental monitoring and regulation of formaldehyde precursors were recommended.
    • Collaboration with other EPA offices was suggested to improve the assessment of formaldehyde exposure in ambient air.
  7. Aggregate Assessment
    • A quantitative aggregate assessment was recommended to better define the relative contributions of various exposure sources. This approach would help identify situations where mitigation strategies are necessary.
    • The committee emphasised the need to focus on vulnerable populations and to use frameworks like RISK21 for a unified risk management strategy.

Public Involvement

The meeting also included public comments from various stakeholders, including industry representatives, environmental groups, and individual citizens. These comments provided additional perspectives on the potential impacts of formaldehyde and the importance of thorough risk evaluations.

The SACC's review of the 2024 Draft Risk Evaluation for Formaldehyde highlights the complexity and significance of this assessment. The committee's recommendations aim to improve the accuracy and reliability of the risk evaluation, ultimately contributing to better protection of human health and the environment. The EPA is expected to incorporate these recommendations into the final risk evaluation, ensuring it reflects the best available science and addresses the concerns of all stakeholders.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

CoatingsEPA Proposes SNURs for 37 New Chemical Substances

April 17, 2025

Congressional hearing reviews on YoutubeConcerns Loom Over Incoming Trump Administration’s Approach to Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act

January 26, 2025

Industrial chemical plantEPA Releases Draft Scope for Vinyl Chloride Risk Evaluation Under TSCA

January 21, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Coatings

EPA Proposes SNURs for 37 New Chemical Substances

EPA proposes SNURs for 37 chemicals under TSCA, impacting US manufacturing. Review the changes and ensure compliance before 6 May 2025.

17

Apr 2025

TSCA
Congressional hearing reviews on Youtube

Concerns Loom Over Incoming Trump Administration’s Approach to Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act

A Congressional hearing reviews the Lautenberg Chemical Safety Act, highlighting EPA delays, industry concerns, and public health protection needs.

26

Jan 2025

TSCA
Industrial chemical plant

EPA Releases Draft Scope for Vinyl Chloride Risk Evaluation Under TSCA

EPA releases draft scope for vinyl chloride risk evaluation under TSCA. Public comments invited until 3 March 2025.

21

Jan 2025

TSCA
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy