EPA Peer Reviewers Provide Feedback on TCEP Risk Evaluation

Dr Steven Brennan
Dr Steven Brennan
2 min readAI-drafted, expert reviewed
Bendy plastics

A recent memorandum from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) shared comments from peer reviewers on the 2023 draft risk evaluation for Tris(2-chloroethyl) Phosphate (TCEP). This chemical, primarily used as a flame retardant and plasticizer, is undergoing evaluation due to potential environmental and health risks. The peer reviewers provided insights on various aspects of the evaluation, particularly focusing on fate assessment, hazard assessment, and exposure analysis.

Fate Assessment: Extrapolating Anaerobic Degradation

In the absence of specific anaerobic degradation data for TCEP, EPA's methodology assumed that degradation rates are 4 to 9 times slower than under aerobic conditions. Reviewers largely supported this approach as a reasonable estimate, despite some reservations about its accuracy. One reviewer recommended considering newer research for additional insights.

Hazard Assessment: Environmental and Human Health Impacts

Using the Web-ICE application, EPA estimated TCEP's acute toxicity to aquatic species and calculated the hazardous concentration for 5% of species (HC05). Reviewers supported using Web-ICE but recommended incorporating more empirical data to improve the species sensitivity distribution and HC05 estimates. They emphasized the importance of better integrating Web-ICE predictions with additional sources, like the Japan Chemicals Collaborative Knowledge database.

For human health effects, EPA's evidence integration tables evaluated TCEP's potential impact across various endpoints, including neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, developmental toxicity, kidney toxicity, and cancer. The reviewers acknowledged the process improvements in systematic review and supported EPA’s overall confidence ratings, which were moderate for each endpoint. They noted that the evidence was sufficient to conclude TCEP's likely neurotoxic and carcinogenic effects, but called for further examination of its developmental impact.

Exposure Analysis and Future Research

Peer reviewers discussed the importance of refining the approach to exposure analysis. The draft evaluation made strides in using advanced models like AERMOD for estimating air deposition and Verner 2008 for assessing infant exposure through human milk. While they acknowledged the progress, they also stressed the need for further research into TCEP's environmental persistence and health impacts to improve regulatory decisions.

EPA's efforts to incorporate peer reviewer feedback into the final risk evaluation for TCEP will be crucial in shaping regulations for this widely-used chemical. The agency aims to publish its final report with comprehensive risk characterization and determination by 2025.

Access the original source

Foresight continuously tracks 1000s of sources and maps updates to your portfolio:

  • Get alerted when changes affect your products or operations
  • Access source documents with full citations
  • Collaborate with your team on alerts and decisions

Related Articles

Join 3,500+ professionals staying ahead

Subscribe to Foresight Weekly and get the latest insights on regulatory changes affecting chemical compliance.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.

Read by professionals at

Boeing
AstraZeneca
Siemens
PepsiCo
SpaceX