News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

ECHA Board of Appeal Overturns Agency's Decision in Chemical Mutagenicity Case

REACH
19
April 2024
•
350
Dr Steven Brennan
The Board identified errors in the Agency's risk assessment regarding the substance's potential for mutagenicity.
Documents on an office desk
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

Key Points of the Decision

On 9 April 2024, the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency issued a pivotal decision in the case of Dragon Chemical Europe GmbH versus the European Chemicals Agency. This case, identified as A-008-2022, centred on the chemical substance 5-amino-o-cresol (CAS 2835-95-2), with the Agency's initial decision made on 24 May 2022, under Article 46 of the REACH Regulation.

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: Dragon Chemical Europe GmbH, Germany
  • Representatives for the Appellant: Ruxandra Cana, Eléonore Mullier, and Hannah Widemann from Steptoe LLP, Belgium
  • Interveners: The National Institute of Health, Italy; PETA Science Consortium International e.V., Germany

Decision Background

The European Chemicals Agency's contested decision required Dragon Chemical Europe to provide additional in vivo testing data to assess the mutagenicity potential of 5-amino-o-cresol. The decision was challenged on several legal grounds, including errors in assessment, proportionality, protection of legitimate expectations, and a failure to adequately state reasons.

Appeal Proceedings

The Board of Appeal, comprising Chairman Antoine Buchet, Technically Qualified Member Nikolaos Georgiadis, and Legally Qualified Member and Rapporteur Marijke Schurmans, thoroughly examined the case. After detailed consideration of all arguments and evidence, including those presented at an oral hearing on 3 October 2023, the Board reached its conclusions.

Detailed Findings and Conclusions

  1. Error in Risk Assessment: The Board identified errors in the Agency's risk assessment regarding the substance's potential for mutagenicity.
  2. Admissibility of Pleas: Some of the pleas by the PETA Science Consortium were deemed admissible as they were connected to the main subject matter of the dispute.
  3. Principle of Proportionality: The Board found that the Agency had breached the principle of proportionality by not adequately demonstrating that the requested tests were necessary and the least onerous measure.
  4. Legitimate Expectations and Duty to State Reasons: It was concluded that the Agency had not breached the appellant’s legitimate expectations or its duty to state reasons adequately.
  5. Animal Welfare Considerations: The decision emphasized adherence to the principle of using animals for testing only as a last resort, aligning with European Union regulations on animal welfare.

Implications of the Decision

The annulment of the contested decision highlights the rigorous checks and balances in place within the European regulatory framework concerning chemical evaluations. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to scientific and legal standards in environmental and public health protection measures.

Read the source story

Key Points of the Decision

On 9 April 2024, the Board of Appeal of the European Chemicals Agency issued a pivotal decision in the case of Dragon Chemical Europe GmbH versus the European Chemicals Agency. This case, identified as A-008-2022, centred on the chemical substance 5-amino-o-cresol, with the Agency's initial decision made on 24 May 2022, under Article 46 of the REACH Regulation.

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: Dragon Chemical Europe GmbH, Germany
  • Representatives for the Appellant: Ruxandra Cana, Eléonore Mullier, and Hannah Widemann from Steptoe LLP, Belgium
  • Interveners: The National Institute of Health, Italy; PETA Science Consortium International e.V., Germany

Decision Background

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Paint coatingsReport Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

May 9, 2025

Automotive chrome platingEU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

May 2, 2025

Industrial coatingRegulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

April 17, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Paint coatings

Report Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

ECHA flags methylenedianilines for potential restrictions in EU due to health and environmental risks; industry urged to monitor developments.

9

May 2025

REACH
Automotive chrome plating

EU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

The EU's proposed Chromium(VI) restriction could reshape REACH compliance and exposure controls across industry. Learn what it means for your business.

2

May 2025

REACH
Industrial coating

Regulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

ECHA proposes compliance checks and future restrictions for amine-terminated aliphatic ethers. Understand how this affects your regulatory obligations.

17

Apr 2025

REACH
CLP
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy