
EFSA Seeks Feedback on Overhaul of Weight of Evidence and Biological Relevance Guidance
EFSA launches consultation on updating its Weight of Evidence and Biological Relevance guidance, aiming to streamline chemical risk assessment practices.


In a press conference held on 24 June 2024, European Parliament co-rapporteurs condemned the European Commission’s unexpected decision to withdraw the Green Claims Directive—a pivotal sustainability regulation intended to combat misleading environmental claims. The decision follows lobbying by three political groups and has major implications for manufacturers, retailers, and sustainability-led businesses across the EU.
The Green Claims Directive, part of the EU's broader Circular Economy and Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, aimed to establish standardised requirements for substantiating and communicating environmental claims on products. Its collapse at the trilogue stage has introduced significant regulatory uncertainty across the manufacturing value chain.
Sandro Gozi (Renew, FR) and Tiemo Wölken (S&D, DE), co-rapporteurs from the Internal Market and Environment Committees respectively, criticised the European Commission’s decision to cancel the trilogue session just hours before it was set to begin. Both MEPs argue that the Commission, under pressure from the European People’s Party (EPP), ECR, and Patriots, acted outside its institutional role, which is to facilitate—not obstruct—legislation.
A key contention was the treatment of micro-enterprises under the directive. The Commission cited lack of exemption as justification for withdrawal. However, both Parliament and Council were aligned on excluding micro-enterprises from scope, making the Commission’s justification appear procedurally unfounded.
The directive was set to establish stricter validation standards for environmental marketing claims, with major implications for compliance, labelling, and product development strategies. Its sudden suspension undermines progress towards a unified sustainability framework, leaving stakeholders vulnerable to inconsistent national policies and ongoing greenwashing.
Manufacturers, retailers, and service providers now face prolonged uncertainty in substantiating environmental claims, potentially delaying eco-innovation and consumer trust-building initiatives.
Both rapporteurs reaffirmed the Parliament’s readiness to resume negotiations, urging the Commission to return to its neutral role. Legal action is unlikely unless the European Parliament’s leadership pursues it formally.
In the meantime, industry professionals are advised to continue aligning with existing national green claims standards and monitor EU-level developments closely.
Foresight continuously tracks 1000s of sources and maps updates to your portfolio:




EFSA launches consultation on updating its Weight of Evidence and Biological Relevance guidance, aiming to streamline chemical risk assessment practices.

Germany's CONMAR-Impact study sets new environmental quality standards for TNT in marine ecosystems, raising industry-wide compliance questions.

EU Member States urge the Commission to accelerate the REACH revision, citing urgent health, environmental, and industry competitiveness needs.
Subscribe to Foresight Weekly and get the latest insights on regulatory changes affecting chemical compliance.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.
Read by professionals at