EU Chemical Regulatory Review: No Immediate Risk Actions for Aliphatic Dicarboxylic Acids (C3-C8)
Assessment finds no immediate need for EU-wide regulatory actions, except for maleic acid’s skin sensitisation risks.
The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) has launched a call for evidence to investigate the non-intentional presence of asbestos fibres in various materials, minerals, and mixtures. This initiative aims to better understand the potential exposure and associated risks of asbestos to human health.
Asbestos Fibres Under Investigation
The focus of this consultation includes several types of asbestos fibres that may be present in natural minerals and products:
- Crocidolite (CAS No. 12001-28-4, EC No. 601-649-8)
- Amosite (CAS No. 12172-73-5, EC No. 601-801-3)
- Anthophyllite (CAS No. 77536-67-5, EC No. 616-472-1)
- Actinolite (CAS No. 77536-66-4, EC No. 616-471-6)
- Tremolite (CAS No. 77536-68-6, EC No. 616-473-7)
- Chrysotile (CAS No. 12001-29-5, 132207-32-0; EC No. 601-650-3)
These fibres are currently listed under entry 6 of Annex XVII to the REACH Regulation, which primarily regulates asbestos that is intentionally added to products. However, the presence of asbestos that is not intentionally added poses significant health risks that require further investigation.
Objective of the Call for Evidence
The objective of this call is to collect comprehensive data on:
- The non-intentional presence of asbestos in natural minerals and products.
- Human inhalation exposure to asbestos fibres from such products.
- Risks to human health that are not adequately controlled under current regulations.
The RIVM has noted cases in the Netherlands where products such as blasting grit and children's make-up were contaminated with asbestos, not as an added ingredient but due to natural occurrence or cross-contamination. Minerals such as talc, serpentine, and vermiculite, which are geologically linked to asbestos, have been highlighted as potential sources of exposure.
Participation and Confidentiality
The call for evidence is open to a broad range of stakeholders, including private companies (manufacturers, suppliers, recyclers, downstream users, distributors, importers), sector associations, laboratories, scientific organisations, NGOs, and other Member State Authorities. Both EU/EEA and non-EU stakeholders are encouraged to contribute.
Participants can submit their contributions confidentially. All information will be treated as such by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). The consultation is an opportunity for stakeholders to provide critical insights that could influence future regulatory actions.
Access the original source
Foresight continuously tracks 1000s of sources and maps updates to your portfolio:
- Get alerted when changes affect your products or operations
- Access source documents with full citations
- Collaborate with your team on alerts and decisions
Related Articles
EU Chemical Regulatory Review: No Immediate Risk Actions for Aliphatic Dicarboxylic Acids (C3-C8)
ECHA Considers Regulatory Action on Alkoxysilyl Carbamates
Norway Proposes Octamethyltrisiloxane as a REACH SVHC
ECHA Considers Regulatory Action on Alkoxysilyl Carbamates
Find out how Alkoxysilyl Carbamates may face new regulatory actions from ECHA due to potential health and environmental risks.
Norway Proposes Octamethyltrisiloxane as a REACH SVHC
ECHA has opened a public consultation on the proposal, with a deadline for submitting comments set for 14 October 2024.
