News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactBook DemoLog in
Start free trial
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

SCHEER Rejects Proposed PFAS Total Standards in Water Directive Over Scientific Limitations

General
17
April 2025
•
450
Dr Steven Brennan
The EU’s SCHEER committee halts PFAS total limits under the Water Framework Directive. Discover the industry impact and next steps.
Man drinking water
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

The EU’s SCHEER committee has rejected proposals to set EQS for PFAS total under the Water Framework Directive, citing analytical and legal deficiencies. Instead, it recommends expanding the PFAS24 approach to include up to 100 substances. This decision impacts compliance strategies for manufacturers and environmental service providers across the EU.

What is PFAS total and why did the EU reject its proposed EQS?

PFAS total refers to the sum of all per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances present in water. The EU rejected the proposed EQS due to insufficient toxicological data and unreliable analytical methods, which could misrepresent actual risks.

How should manufacturers respond to the EU’s rejection of PFAS total standards?

Manufacturers should focus on existing PFAS24 compliance thresholds and prepare for regulatory expansion using RPF methodologies. Investing in targeted PFAS analysis and understanding supply chain exposures is essential to stay ahead of evolving EU policy.

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The European Commission’s scientific advisory group, SCHEER, has rejected the proposal to establish Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for “PFAS total” under the Water Framework Directive, citing analytical and toxicological shortcomings. Published on 7 April 2025, the final opinion affects all manufacturers, processors, and water management stakeholders across the EU who rely on regulatory clarity for compliance and product risk assessments.

Why PFAS Total Standards Were Scrutinised

SCHEER’s evaluation focused on six options proposed by the Joint Research Centre (JRC) to address thousands of PFAS substances in groundwater and surface waters. Option 5, a tiered strategy leveraging a 0.5 µg F/L parametric value from the Drinking Water Directive, was preferred by the JRC but ultimately dismissed by SCHEER due to a lack of toxicological justification.

SCHEER stated: “Using total organic fluorine as a means for setting an EQS for ‘PFAS total’ is incompatible with the legal definition of an EQS value.” The committee also criticised existing analytical methods as insufficiently sensitive and potentially misleading—either overestimating or underestimating true PFAS concentrations depending on sample conditions.

PFAS Uses and Industry Risk

PFAS substances are widely used in industrial coatings, electronics, textiles, and firefighting foams. However, their persistence and links to environmental and health risks—including toxicity, bioaccumulation, and potential endocrine disruption—have put them in the crosshairs of EU chemical policy reforms. Without a harmonised “PFAS total” EQS, manufacturers must continue monitoring substance-specific thresholds, currently limited to 24 PFAS compounds.

SCHEER Recommends Expanding the PFAS24 Approach

Rather than adopting a broad-brush approach, SCHEER endorsed Option 6—‘No agreement on EQS derivation’—and advocated for the expansion of the PFAS24 list to include up to 100 reliably measurable PFAS using Relative Potency Factor (RPF) methods. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), a short-chain PFAS, was specifically recommended for inclusion.

The committee highlighted the urgent need for new toxicity data, and proposed leveraging REACH and other regulatory databases to accelerate risk profiling. “It is not possible to set a reasonably reliable water quality standard for PFAS total… molecules of interest must be identified and their toxicity known,” SCHEER concluded.

Industry Implications and Next Steps

This decision signals that for now, businesses must manage compliance using individual PFAS thresholds and invest in advanced analytical methods. Water treatment providers, manufacturing plants, and downstream users should stay updated on evolving RPF methodologies and prepare for eventual inclusion of more PFAS under EQS regulation.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

European Parliament EU Faces Scrutiny Over Inaction on Chemicals Strategy Commitments

June 26, 2025

EU ParliamentCommission’s Surprise Move on Green Claims Directive Sparks Industry Uncertainty

June 25, 2025

China flagChina’s Draft Environmental Code Proposes Stringent Controls on Chemicals

June 20, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

European Parliament

EU Faces Scrutiny Over Inaction on Chemicals Strategy Commitments

A European Parliament report highlights the EU’s failure to deliver key chemicals strategy actions, affecting policy certainty across sectors.

26

Jun 2025

General
EU Parliament

Commission’s Surprise Move on Green Claims Directive Sparks Industry Uncertainty

EU Green Claims Directive faces uncertainty after Commission signals withdrawal, raising concerns for manufacturers, retailers, and sustainability stakeholders.

25

Jun 2025

General
China flag

China’s Draft Environmental Code Proposes Stringent Controls on Chemicals

China's draft environmental code introduces sweeping chemical controls. Learn how it affects compliance and risk across your manufacturing value chain.

20

Jun 2025

General
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy