Food safety · Cereulide in infant formula · October 2026

When to watch.When to act.

Cereulide was a known hazard long before the formula recalls. Follow how the evidence changed, and when it became a decision for an infant-nutrition business.

Researched with Foresight Assistant · Original research 25 September 2026 · Publication update 20 October 2026

12 units · 36-atom ring · binds potassiumDrag to turn
37 decision points, in order. Numbered points are the eight turning points.
  • Watch
  • Investigate
  • Act

1994 to 2024 · 12 points

December 2025 to October 2026 · 25 points

The question

When does a known hazard become a decision for your business?

For a manufacturer of infant-nutrition products, knowing that a toxin exists is only the beginning. The harder question is whether new evidence changes the safety assessment of an ingredient, a supplier, a production process or a test result.

Cereulide makes that question concrete. Research raised questions about how the toxin forms and how to detect it years before the public recalls. The incident then brought a shared ingredient into view: arachidonic acid oil, or ARA oil, used in infant formula. Later evidence challenged how reliably some tests recovered the toxin.

We used Foresight Assistant to connect that record, from scientific literature and public notices to NGO questions, laboratory methods and government action. The story below follows what became public, and the decisions it could support.

01The cereulide story

A known toxin.A changing decision.

Follow the evidence as it becomes public. At each point, ask what it changes for a large manufacturer of infant-nutrition products.

The evidence begins years before the recall. For an infant-nutrition manufacturer, each new finding changes a different question: formulation, heat treatment, testing, sourcing or exposure. The useful signal is the one that changes a decision about your own products.

  1. 01A relevant hazard

    Watch

    Keep the issue in the hazard review. Set an owner, an evidence question and a trigger for a closer look.

  2. 02A plausible connection

    Investigate

    Check ingredients, methods, suppliers and lots. Establish whether the new evidence reaches your products.

  3. 03A decision threshold

    Act

    Take a proportionate control, incident or compliance action when the relevant exposure or obligation is established.

An example business: a maker of infant-nutrition products with powdered ingredients and ARA oil in its supply chain. The decisions below are written for it. A recall is one possible action, not the answer to every signal.

Figure 1 · The evidence trail

Decades of research. Then ten months of response.

105 dated records became public before December 2025, almost all of them science and standards. 113 followed in the next ten months, mostly recalls, government action and stakeholder statements. Above them, the 37 decision points move between watch, investigate and act.

  • Watch
  • Investigate
  • Act
  • Turning point
  • One evidence record
ActInvestigateWatchScienceStandardsGovernmentRecallsStakeholders1970 to November 2025 · by yearCS001 · 25 May 1974 · Fried-rice emetic illness episodes linked to Bacillus cereusCS106 · Jan 1979 · Properties and production characteristics of vomiting, diarrhoeal and necrotizing toxins of Bacillus cereusCS002 · Oct 1989 · Toxin production by dairy isolates in milk at low temperaturesCS004 · Aug 1994 · Isolation and chemical characterisation of cereulideCS003 · Sept 1994 · Bacillus cereus occurrence in infant foods and dried milk productsCS208 · 1995 · Structure and stereochemistry of cereulideCS005 · Jun 1995 · Demonstration that cereulide causes emesisCS006 · Mar 1997 · Maltodextrin-supported growth and diarrhoeal enterotoxin in infant formulaCS007 · 17 Apr 1997 · Fulminant liver failure associated with B. cereus emetic toxinCS008 · Apr 1998 · Boar-sperm bioassay for emetic toxinCS107 · May 1999 · Pathological effect of synthetic cereulide, an emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus, is reversible in miceCS108 · Jul 1999 · Ionophoretic properties and mitochondrial effects of cereulide: the emetic toxin of B. cereusCS109 · Nov 2000 · Bacillus cereus produces most emetic toxin at lower temperaturesCS110 · 24 Oct 2001 · Production of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin (cereulide) in various foodsCS111 · 18 Sept 2002 · Bacillus cereus emetic toxin production in relation to dissolved oxygen tension and sporulationCS009 · Oct 2003 · In-vitro assay for human toxicity of cereulideCS112 · 25 May 2004 · Atmospheric oxygen and other conditions affecting the production of cereulide by Bacillus cereus in foodCS010 · 16 Jun 2004 · ISO colony-count method for presumptive Bacillus cereusCS011 · Jan 2005 · Identification of the cereulide synthetase gene and ces PCRCS012 · Apr 2005 · European assessment of Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus species in foodCS113 · Aug 2005 · Fatal family outbreak of Bacillus cereus-associated food poisoningCS114 · 19 Sept 2005 · Occurrence of emetic toxin producing Bacillus cereus in the dairy production chainCS115 · 2006 · Bacillus cereus is common in the environment but emetic toxin producing isolates are rareCS015 · 13 Jan 2006 · ISO low-number presumptive Bacillus cereus methodCS014 · 19 Jan 2006 · Cereulide production in selected infant-food formulationsCS013 · 24 Feb 2006 · Distinct growth and heat-resistance traits of emetic strainsCS116 · 27 Oct 2006 · Toxicological profile of cereulide, the Bacillus cereus emetic toxin, in functional assays with human, animal and bacterial cellsCS016 · 26 Jan 2007 · Real-time PCR for emetic Bacillus cereus in foodsCS017 · 7 Dec 2007 · EU presumptive Bacillus cereus process criterion for dried infant formulaCS018 · 2008 · Codex code for powdered formula manufacture, ingredients and preparationCS019 · 18 Mar 2008 · Heat resistance of cereulideCS131 · 12 Jun 2008 · Environment-driven cereulide production by emetic strains of Bacillus cereusCS020 · 8 Dec 2009 · Stable-isotope dilution analysis for cereulideCS021 · Oct 2010 · LC-MS quantification using synthetic cereulide standardCS132 · 8 Feb 2011 · Inhibition of cereulide toxin synthesis by emetic Bacillus cereus via long-chain polyphosphatesCS159 · 25 Oct 2011 · LC-MS/MS analysis of cereulide in processed cereal foods and milk powderCS117 · Dec 2011 · Sudden death of a young adult associated with Bacillus cereus food poisoningCS160 · 17 Dec 2011 · Tandem-MS determination of cereulide in food productsCS161 · 14 Aug 2012 · Cereulide prevalence in restaurant rice dishesCS162 · 28 Nov 2012 · Rapid quantitative LC-MS/MS detection in foodsCS023 · 19 Apr 2013 · Potentially enterotoxigenic B. cereus in infant milk powderCS022 · 27 May 2013 · B. cereus and enterotoxin genes in infant foodsCS118 · 8 May 2014 · Emetic Bacillus cereus are more volatile than thought: recent foodborne outbreaks and prevalence studies in Bavaria (2007–2013)CS119 · 2 Dec 2014 · An emetic Bacillus cereus outbreak in a kindergarten: detection and quantification of critical levels of cereulide toxinCS163 · 11 Dec 2014 · Quantitative UPLC-MS/MS using native and isotope-labelled standardsCS120 · 10 Feb 2015 · Chemodiversity of cereulide, the emetic toxin of Bacillus cereusCS164 · 20 Mar 2015 · LC-MS/MS determination in pasta, rice and creamCS165 · Sept 2015 · Multiparametric quantitation of cereulide and isocereulides A–GCS024 · 10 Dec 2015 · Viable enterotoxin-producing B. cereus detection in infant-formula powderCS121 · 6 Jun 2016 · Evaluation of the toxicity and toxicokinetics of cereulide from an emetic Bacillus cereus strain of milk originCS025 · 20 Jul 2016 · Updated European assessment of the B. cereus groupCS166 · 4 Oct 2016 · Simultaneous determination of cereulide, beauvericin and enniatinsCS122 · 25 Oct 2016 · Temperature exerts control of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin production on post-transcriptional levelsCS026 · 11 Jan 2017 · ISO quantitative cereulide LC-MS/MS methodCS167 · 18 Jan 2017 · Multi-stage production of ARA-rich microbial oilCS027 · 6 May 2017 · Growth and toxin production in reconstituted initial infant formulaCS168 · 12 Apr 2018 · Elaboration and validation of the ISO cereulide methodCS028 · 31 May 2018 · National survey of B. cereus in powdered infant and follow-on formulaCS123 · 7 Nov 2018 · First insights into within-host translocation of the Bacillus cereus toxin cereulide using a porcine modelCS169 · 26 Nov 2018 · LC-MS/MS identification and quantification in cow’s milkCS170 · 23 Jan 2019 · Direct MALDI-TOF differentiation of emetic and non-emetic isolatesCS171 · 9 Apr 2019 · Rapid detection of cereulide in cultures and food extractsCS124 · 26 Jul 2019 · Why be serious about emetic Bacillus cereus: cereulide production and industrial challengesCS172 · 6 Oct 2020 · Evaluation of MALDI-TOF for culture-derived cereulideCS125 · 28 Jan 2021 · The food poisoning toxins of Bacillus cereusCS029 · 17 Feb 2021 · Modelling growth and cereulide formation across food matricesCS030 · 28 Jul 2021 · Distribution of cereulide in cow-milk lipid phasesCS173 · 17 Aug 2021 · Enzymatic degumming of fungal ARA oilCS126 · 24 Aug 2021 · Cereulide exposure caused cytopathogenic damages of liver and kidney in miceCS174 · 19 Nov 2021 · Cereulide association with biofilm structures and processing surfacesCS127 · 23 Dec 2021 · Acute liver failure after ingestion of fried rice balls: a case series of Bacillus cereus food poisoningsCS128 · 27 Jan 2022 · Bacillus cereus toxin repertoire: diversity of (iso)cereulide(s)CS031 · 14 Sept 2022 · Paediatric multi-organ failure from cereulide-producing B. cereusCS032 · 8 Mar 2023 · US powdered-infant-formula supplier and biological-hazard controlsCS033 · 8 Dec 2023 · Lactose inhibition of cereulide biosynthesis in milkCS175 · 27 Dec 2023 · Targeted LC-MS/MS for food and faecesCS129 · 8 Jan 2024 · Effect of temperature, pH, and aw on cereulide synthesis and regulator-gene transcription with respect to Bacillus cereus growth and cereulide productionCS176 · 22 Mar 2024 · QuEChERS LC-MS/MS screening for fried riceCS130 · 26 Mar 2024 · A poisonous cocktail: interplay of cereulide toxin and its structural isomers in emetic Bacillus cereusCS177 · 30 Jun 2024 · Wall-material effects on ARA-oil microcapsulesCS034 · 11 Dec 2024 · FDA quantitative cereulide method including infant formulaCS178 · 7 May 2025 · Solid-state production of ARA-enriched fungal lipidsCS179 · 4 Sept 2025 · Candidate cooked-rice CRM for cereulideCS105 · Mar 1976 · An autopsy case of food poisoning associated with Bacillus cereusCS209 · 1 Apr 1999 · Semiautomated metabolic staining assay for emetic toxinCS210 · 1 May 2002 · Quantitative cereulide production under controlled conditionsCS211 · 1 Jan 2005 · Evolutionary lineage of cereulide-producing strainsCS212 · 2 Mar 2006 · Cereulide synthetase locus and megaplasmid locationCS213 · 1 Jul 2006 · Psychrotolerant cereulide-producing B. weihenstephanensisCS214 · 15 Dec 2006 · Computer-assisted sperm-motility assay across foodsCS215 · 1 Jan 2007 · Complete sequence of the cereulide-encoding plasmidCS216 · 28 Apr 2009 · Higher-order structure and metal complexationCS217 · 18 May 2009 · Diversity of cereulide-producing B. cereus group strainsCS218 · 6 Mar 2011 · Cereulide production in stored pastaCS219 · 24 Apr 2012 · Cereulide-like paenilides from a psychrotolerant organismCS220 · 1 May 2012 · Reversible acute liver failure after emetic-type food poisoningCS221 · 19 Oct 2012 · Mass-spectrometric profiling of cereulide productionCS222 · 19 Nov 2012 · qPCR differentiation of emetic and non-emetic strains in milkCS223 · 28 May 2013 · Potato endophytes producing measured cereulideCS224 · 24 Dec 2013 · Rapid real-time PCR for emetic strains in foodsCS225 · 7 Jun 2014 · Genomic mobility of the cereulide locusCS226 · 17 Oct 2014 · Liver transplantation after cereulide-associated multi-organ failureCS227 · 27 May 2015 · Depsipeptide intermediates in cereulide biosynthesisCS228 · 13 Oct 2015 · Multiple-level control of cereulide synthesisCS229 · 4 Mar 2021 · Structural revision of isocereulide A19701980199020002010202005 · 27 December 2007 · A process obligation · Act02 · 18 September 2002 · Oxygen changes production · Investigate04 · 19 January 2006 · The formula question · Investigate06 · 12 June 2008 · Growth is not toxin output · Investigate07 · 8 February 2011 · Measured toxin in a model · Investigate08 · 20 July 2016 · The testing blind spot · Investigate09 · 12 April 2018 · Read the validation range · Investigate10 · 28 July 2021 · Follow the fat phase · Investigate11 · 19 November 2021 · Look beyond the liquid · Investigate12 · 11 December 2024 · Make investigation ready · Investigate01 · September 1994 · A relevant hazard · Watch03 · 19 September 2005 · Rare strains, local persistence · WatchDecember 2025 to October 2026 · by monthCS072 · 10 Dec 2025 · Hungarian infant-formula recall after self-check at Netherlands plantCS073 · 10 Dec 2025 · Finnish single-lot precautionary formula recallCS074 · 11 Dec 2025 · French single-lot infant-formula recallCS133 · 11 Dec 2025 · Poland: precautionary withdrawal after a production-line B. cereus findingCS037 · 17 Dec 2025 · Austrian public notice following earlier European recallsCS075 · 18 Dec 2025 · Danish recall history in a later amended authority releaseCS041 · 5 Jan 2026 · First Netherlands consumer warningCS042 · 5 Jan 2026 · Nationwide German recall with later batch extensionCS076 · 5 Jan 2026 · Initial UK toxin-based infant-formula recallCS043 · 6 Jan 2026 · Quantified cereulide in formula from GermanyCS134 · 6 Jan 2026 · Saudi Arabia: warning against specified infant-formula batchesCS185 · 6 Jan 2026 · Romanian-market manufacturer recall noticeCS044 · 7 Jan 2026 · A regulator outside Europe prohibits the affected lotsCS078 · 7 Jan 2026 · Trade press links cereulide to ARA oilCS079 · 7 Jan 2026 · Foodwatch questions the transparency of the recallCS077 · 8 Jan 2026 · UK recall batch-date correctionCS080 · 9 Jan 2026 · French consumer association identifies ARA vehicleCS135 · 10 Jan 2026 · Portugal: preventive withdrawal with traceability and effectiveness oversightCS047 · 12 Jan 2026 · French-produced formula recall across EU and third countriesCS048 · 13 Jan 2026 · ARA oil publicly named in Asia-Pacific formula recallCS137 · 14 Jan 2026 · Indonesia: imported-formula test results and temporary import stopCS138 · 15 Jan 2026 · Finland: one traceability-driven specialist-formula extensionCS139 · 15 Jan 2026 · China: regulator states domestic recall was implementedCS140 · 17 Jan 2026 · Singapore: two additional toxin-positive formulas and export stopCS081 · 21 Jan 2026 · Open questions on recall timing, ARA identification and supplier notificationCS050 · 22 Jan 2026 · France orders sector-wide risk analysis after second manufacturer recallCS051 · 22 Jan 2026 · Preventive withdrawal plus confirmation that another recalled range was not importedCS052 · 23 Jan 2026 · Two suspected illness reports during ongoing recallCS053 · 23 Jan 2026 · Two-company Australian infant-formula recallsCS186 · 23 Jan 2026 · Targeted-recall statement under evolving authority guidanceCS141 · 24 Jan 2026 · Thailand: no authorisation or sale of the recalled formulas identifiedCS187 · 26 Jan 2026 · Commercial laboratory statement on emerging cereulide testingCS055 · 27 Jan 2026 · EU agencies describe a global preventive recall and early clinical evidenceCS082 · 27 Jan 2026 · EU question on infant-formula governance and deaths under investigationCS083 · 28 Jan 2026 · French minister orders urgent testing by all users of implicated oilCS035 · 29 Jan 2026 · Initial factory detection and confirmationCS039 · 29 Jan 2026 · Oil-blend and ARA hypothesis; supplier and trade-association notificationCS056 · 29 Jan 2026 · Manufacturer publishes consolidated sequence and testing claimsCS084 · 29 Jan 2026 · Complaint filed with eight affected familiesCS188 · 29 Jan 2026 · Senate debate on phased recalls and strategic ingredient dependenceCS143 · 30 Jan 2026 · Singapore: major-retailer infant-formula testing completedCS189 · 30 Jan 2026 · Manufacturer response disputing allegations of delay and negligenceCS057 · 31 Jan 2026 · France lowers provisional infant exposure thresholdCS058 · 2 Feb 2026 · Infant ARfD and formula concentration thresholdsCS059 · 2 Feb 2026 · First Austrian health-harmful concentration and earlier low-positive findingsCS060 · 3 Feb 2026 · German recall widened after reassessmentCS061 · 3 Feb 2026 · Additional Northern Ireland batch addedCS085 · 3 Feb 2026 · Italian formula occurrence and B. cereus virulence studyCS190 · 3 Feb 2026 · Proposal for inquiry into multinational food-contamination responsibilityCS191 · 3 Feb 2026 · European specialised-nutrition sector statementCS192 · 3 Feb 2026 · Early professional risk explanation distinguishing toxin from bacteriaCS145 · 4 Feb 2026 · Finland: three further batches added after revised risk assessmentCS146 · 4 Feb 2026 · Belgium: narrowly distributed 400 g infant-formula recallCS142 · 4 Feb 2026 · Japan: no commercial import of recalled products and no implicated ingredient in domestic formulaCS086 · 5 Feb 2026 · Alternative ARA supplier promotes end-to-end process controlCS193 · 5 Feb 2026 · Threshold-driven manufacturer recall extensionCS062 · 6 Feb 2026 · Formula and powder action limits with mandatory recall responseCS150 · 6 Feb 2026 · Belgium: major extension following revised European adviceCS151 · 10 Feb 2026 · Japan: hold instructions for Chinese ARA-oil consignmentsCS194 · 11 Feb 2026 · Call for independent controls and full transparencyCS152 · 12 Feb 2026 · Luxembourg: 30 formula samples tested and three infant cases investigatedCS153 · 12 Feb 2026 · China: all domestic infant-formula producers directed to test for emetic toxinCS087 · 16 Feb 2026 · Clinical criteria for toxin testing and evidence preservationCS088 · 16 Feb 2026 · Preliminary investigation follows NGO complaintCS195 · 17 Feb 2026 · Consumer NGO request for EU investigation and transparencyCS196 · 18 Feb 2026 · Swiss follow-up requiring company and supplier-control improvementsCS197 · 18 Feb 2026 · Reference-material announcement for cereulide measurementCS036 · 19 Feb 2026 · First incident-linked RASFF notification and limited European recallCS038 · 19 Feb 2026 · First cross-border infant gastrointestinal signalCS040 · 19 Feb 2026 · Cereulide confirmed in oil mixes and historical ARA deliveriesCS045 · 19 Feb 2026 · Spanish and Swiss manufacturing-site recallsCS046 · 19 Feb 2026 · Italian recall included a batch made with ARA that tested negativeCS049 · 19 Feb 2026 · Additional Swiss manufacturer and intermediary network implicatedCS054 · 19 Feb 2026 · Positive finished products and 16-batch Irish recallCS064 · 19 Feb 2026 · Multi-country cases, eight-company traceability and low current exposureCS198 · 19 Feb 2026 · Manufacturer statement on recall completion and alternative supplyCS199 · 19 Feb 2026 · Consumer NGO response disputing residual-risk and return adviceCS200 · 20 Feb 2026 · Industry association response emphasising reduced current exposureCS065 · 25 Feb 2026 · Binding controls on Chinese-origin ARA oilCS066 · 25 Feb 2026 · Eighteen samples showed no measurable cereulideCS154 · 27 Feb 2026 · Saudi Arabia: additional infant-formula manufacturer warningCS155 · 27 Feb 2026 · Belgium: authority recalls imported infant formula following RASFFCS089 · 2 Mar 2026 · Belgian consumer association consolidates multi-company recallsCS090 · 3 Mar 2026 · Court reviews request to alter health communicationsCS201 · 6 Mar 2026 · Consumer-centre review of recalls, corrections and cautious reassuranceCS063 · 9 Mar 2026 · Recall expanded to about two million kilograms across 18 countriesCS091 · 9 Mar 2026 · Austrian cases, extensive testing and extraction-method findingsCS092 · 11 Mar 2026 · Commission clarifies alert timing and declines immediate rule overhaulCS067 · 13 Mar 2026 · Ninety-nine-country distribution and moderate global riskCS156 · 15 Mar 2026 · Singapore: additional positive infant and toddler formulasCS068 · 24 Mar 2026 · No measurable toxin or new products after full complaint follow-upCS094 · 26 Mar 2026 · Powdered-formula cereulide industry webinarCS157 · 31 Mar 2026 · Czechia: toxin-positive first-infant formula judged harmfulCS202 · 2 Apr 2026 · Updated professional overview of incident and analytical responseCS204 · 16 Apr 2026 · Government answer on delayed-recall claims and suspect-product analysisCS181 · 8 May 2026 · Hydration-assisted SPE-UPLC-MS/MS for infant formulaCS095 · 19 May 2026 · Parliamentary mission identifies alert and supplier-control failuresCS097 · 28 May 2026 · LC-MS/MS method for formula, ARA oil and dairy matricesCS069 · 31 May 2026 · New growing-up-formula positive outside the main early recall waveCS096 · Jun 2026 · Diagnostic evidence on encapsulated ARA and powder under-recoveryCS098 · 11 Jun 2026 · Direct chemical testing added to laboratory capabilityCS099 · 19 Jun 2026 · Water-acetonitrile extraction corrects powder underestimationCS100 · 3 Jul 2026 · Commission links incident to import controls and EU fermentation capabilityCS070 · 15 Jul 2026 · One non-compliant cereulide sample among extensive ARA-formula controlsCS182 · 23 Jul 2026 · UPLC-MS/MS determination in ARA oil and microencapsulated ARA powderCS205 · 23 Jul 2026 · Mid-year operational recovery statementCS206 · 29 Jul 2026 · Mid-year investor discussion of formula-category recoveryCS158 · 17 Aug 2026 · Poland: one positive production cycle and precautionary adjacent-batch recallCS071 · 1 Sept 2026 · Draft finished-formula cereulide criterion remains proposedCS207 · 3 Sept 2026 · Exporter-facing explanation of proposed cereulide criterionCS093 · Mar 2026 · Commercial claim for cereulide removal from ARA oilCS231 · 13 Oct 2026 · Cereulide in Powdered Infant Formula: Microbial Ecology, Detection, and a Supply-Chain Perspective on Risk ManagementCS230 · 15 Oct 2026 · Previously recalled Nutrilon returns to Czech retail shelvesDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct202619 · 28 January 2026 · A supplier-specific direction · Act20 · 31 January 2026 · Reassess French lots · Act21 · 2 February 2026 · An infant-specific basis · Act22 · 12 February 2026 · A national testing direction · Act25 · 26 February 2026 · An import obligation · Act29 · 31 March 2026 · Exposure changes the lot decision · Act34 · 17 August 2026 · A later lot reopens the issue · Act37 · 15 October 2026 · Recalled stock returns to sale · Act13 · 10 December 2025 · The first public recalls · Investigate14 · 5 January 2026 · The raw-material route · Investigate15 · 7 January 2026 · ARA becomes explicit · Investigate16 · 17 January 2026 · Follow the export route · Investigate17 · 21 January 2026 · Account for the decisions · Investigate18 · 22 January 2026 · Beyond one manufacturer · Investigate23 · 18 February 2026 · Retained packs change the picture · Investigate24 · 19 February 2026 · The chain is reconstructed · Investigate26 · 13 March 2026 · Check the global reach · Investigate27 · 15 March 2026 · A survey is not permanent clearance · Investigate30 · 30 April 2026 · A formula-method warning · Investigate31 · 8 May 2026 · Reopen the extraction question · Investigate32 · 19 June 2026 · Revisit the negative result · Investigate33 · 23 July 2026 · Oil and powder need different preparation · Investigate28 · 24 March 2026 · Evidence can narrow scope · Watch35 · 1 September 2026 · Prepare for a proposal · Watch36 · 29 September 2026 · Feedback closes; adoption remains ahead · Watch01 A relevant hazard04 The formula question08 The testing blind spot13 The first public recalls15 ARA becomes explicit19 A supplier-specific direction31 Reopen the extraction question34 A later lot reopens the issue

The scale changes at 1 December 2025: years on the left, months on the right. Each record sits at the date it became public, and each dot links to its decision point below. 12 records with no known publication date are not shown.

Show the counts as a table
Dated evidence records by family and period
Evidence familyBefore December 2025December 2025 to October 2026
Scientific literature773
Standards & methods247
Government & assessment437
Recalls & incidents038
Stakeholders028
All dated records105113
Show
  1. 01WatchTurning pointSources: Science

    A relevant hazard

    Put the organism and the toxin on the same watchlist.

    What became public

    A survey reports B. cereus in infant foods and dried milk products. Separately, researchers isolate and characterise cereulide. Together they justify a hazard question for infant nutrition; they do not demonstrate toxin in those surveyed products.

    The question for your business

    Does our hazard review distinguish bacterial occurrence, toxin-producing strains and pre-formed toxin?

    What to do

    Give the issue an owner. Track infant-food findings, emetic-strain evidence and analytical methods alongside ingredient and process data.

    EvidenceCS003CS004

  2. 02InvestigateSources: Science

    Oxygen changes production

    The process conditions matter as much as the organism.

    What became public

    A study in skim-milk medium finds much lower toxin activity in static culture, no detectable activity under the tested anaerobic conditions, and no correlation between toxin production and spore count.

    The question for your business

    Could agitation, oxygen exposure and holding conditions make a wet ingredient or intermediate more supportive of toxin formation?

    What to do

    What to do

    Review the relevant wet-process conditions and the evidence used to control them. Establish when an emetic-strain finding would trigger toxin-specific investigation.

    EvidenceCS111

  3. 03WatchSources: Science

    Rare strains, local persistence

    Low overall prevalence can conceal a persistent local source.

    What became public

    A large Swedish dairy-chain study finds confirmed emetic producers to be rare, while identifying local clonal amplification in parts of the dairy environment.

    The question for your business

    Are repeated findings in a supplier or production niche being dismissed because the overall prevalence is low?

    What to do

    What to do

    Keep the hazard under review. Investigate recurring emetic-strain findings in relevant silos, equipment or ingredient streams, using targeted sampling and supplier follow-up.

    EvidenceCS114

  4. 04InvestigateTurning pointSources: Science

    The formula question

    The hazard becomes a formulation question.

    What became public

    A study isolates cereulide-producing strains from commercial infant foods and demonstrates toxin accumulation in deliberately inoculated, unrefrigerated reconstituted foods. Cereal–dairy formulations are especially supportive in the experiment.

    The question for your business

    Do our formulations and realistic preparation conditions resemble the conditions in which toxin formed?

    What to do

    Review formulation-specific challenge evidence, preparation instructions and institutional feeding practices. Include toxin formation where the exposure scenario makes it relevant.

    EvidenceCS014

  5. 05ActSources: Government · Standards

    A process obligation

    Apply the bacterial process criterion.

    What became public

    The EU amendment published on 7 December takes effect. It introduces a presumptive B. cereus process-hygiene criterion for specified dried infant formula and infant medical foods.

    The question for your business

    Are our products in scope, and do our process controls and sampling meet the applicable criterion?

    What to do

    What to do

    Implement the applicable process criterion and corrective actions. Review production hygiene, recontamination prevention and raw-material selection.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: A process failure warrants corrective action and a safety assessment of affected material. It does not automatically establish a need for consumer recall.

    EvidenceCS017CS010

  6. 06InvestigateSources: Science

    Growth is not toxin output

    A matrix can support growth without the same toxin response.

    What became public

    Seven tested strains show strong matrix-dependent differences in measured cereulide. Milk-based agars generally support low toxin despite growth, and composition helps explain the variation.

    The question for your business

    Does our hazard assessment assume that bacterial growth predicts toxin formation equally across every formulation?

    What to do

    What to do

    Check whether challenge studies and process assumptions represent the actual formulation, strains and conditions. Keep growth, gene presence and measured toxin as separate evidence.

    EvidenceCS131

  7. 07InvestigateSources: Science

    Measured toxin in a model

    The infant-food question now includes toxin-specific measurements.

    What became public

    A study of polyphosphate inhibition measures cereulide in deliberately inoculated, reconstituted infant food and oat milk. Growth inhibition and toxin suppression do not behave identically.

    The question for your business

    Do our formulation and preparation assumptions address preformed toxin as well as bacterial growth?

    What to do

    What to do

    Review toxin-specific evidence for relevant reconstituted matrices and abuse conditions. Use the result to sharpen investigation triggers and method selection.

    EvidenceCS132

  8. 08InvestigateTurning pointSources: Science · Government

    The testing blind spot

    A reassuring count may leave a toxin question unanswered.

    What became public

    EFSA’s assessment explains that cereulide can coexist with low cell counts and that commonly used industrial controls do not inactivate the toxin. Risk depends on strain, matrix and conditions.

    The question for your business

    Are we relying on an organism count or a heat step to answer a question about pre-formed cereulide?

    What to do

    Review the hazard analysis and escalation tests. Where plausible exposure exists, distinguish counts, emetic-strain characterisation and direct toxin measurement.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: A toxin-positive ingredient needs containment and a qualified exposure assessment; routine heat treatment cannot be assumed to make it suitable for use.

    EvidenceCS025CS019

  9. 09InvestigateSources: Science · Standards

    Read the validation range

    A method name is only the beginning of the evidence.

    What became public

    The collaborative validation behind ISO 18465 covers seven spiked food matrices, including infant formula, at microgram-per-kilogram study levels.

    The question for your business

    Does the laboratory validation cover our matrix, sample preparation and the concentration at which we need to make a decision?

    What to do

    What to do

    Document the validated matrix and concentration range. Where a planned use falls outside it, establish the additional validation needed before relying on the result.

    EvidenceCS168

  10. 10InvestigateSources: Science · Standards

    Follow the fat phase

    A lipid result changes the sampling question.

    What became public

    Researchers find that cereulide increasingly partitions into the lipid phase as milk fat rises; adding sunflower oil also shifts its distribution. This is relevant to the design of toxin analysis in fatty matrices.

    The question for your business

    If we test an oil, fat blend or high-fat formula, does extraction recover toxin across the relevant phases?

    What to do

    What to do

    Check homogenisation, extraction, recovery and sampling with the laboratory. Use the international toxin method as a starting point, with validation for the actual matrix.

    EvidenceCS030CS026

  11. 11InvestigateSources: Science

    Look beyond the liquid

    A toxin investigation may need to include equipment surfaces.

    What became public

    Laboratory research finds cereulide associated with cells, biofilm material, glass and stainless steel, rather than only with the surrounding liquid.

    The question for your business

    Could liquid-only sampling miss a relevant equipment niche when emetic strains or toxin recur?

    What to do

    What to do

    Include relevant surfaces and removable equipment parts in root-cause sampling. Check cleaning performance against the hazard being investigated.

    EvidenceCS174

  12. 12InvestigateSources: Standards · Government

    Make investigation ready

    A public method supports readiness planning.

    What became public

    FDA’s public quantitative cereulide method includes infant formula among its validation matrices. It sets out extraction, isotope-labelled internal standard, confirmation and quality checks.

    The question for your business

    Could we obtain a defensible toxin result quickly if a complaint, supplier deviation or emetic-strain finding made it necessary?

    What to do

    What to do

    Qualify laboratory capability, sampling and matrix performance in advance. Define which findings trigger toxin testing and who reviews the result.

    EvidenceCS034

  13. 13InvestigateTurning pointSources: Recalls · Government

    The first public recalls

    A recall makes the shared-production question urgent.

    What became public

    Hungarian and Finnish authorities publish formula recalls after manufacturer self-checks at a Netherlands plant. The Hungarian notice names cereulide; the Finnish notice describes a limited production-line finding.

    The question for your business

    Do our products share an affected lot, manufacturing line, contract site or material route?

    What to do

    Open a focused incident check. Compare the named products and production connections with your own records, and ask relevant manufacturers and suppliers for traceability evidence.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: Contain implicated stock and follow the applicable recall or incident response. An unaffected manufacturer's first task is to establish whether there is a connection.

    EvidenceCS072CS073

  14. 14InvestigateSources: Recalls · Government

    The raw-material route

    The question moves upstream from the production line.

    What became public

    A Dutch consumer warning identifies cereulide in a raw material used in specified formula batches. The initial UK notice names the toxin and affected products. Neither notice names ARA oil.

    The question for your business

    Could a shared input connect our products to the affected batches, including through an oil blend or intermediary?

    What to do

    What to do

    Extend checks beyond the named production site. Obtain the original ingredient producer, intermediary and lot genealogy for plausible shared inputs.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: Hold possible matches while traceability and testing are resolved; escalate confirmed or traced affected products through the incident process.

    EvidenceCS041CS076

  15. 15InvestigateTurning pointSources: Stakeholders · Recalls

    ARA becomes explicit

    A named ingredient gives the search a precise target.

    What became public

    Dated trade reporting quotes a manufacturer advisory and explicitly identifies ARA oil. It is the earliest public link to ARA oil we found. Foodwatch raises a separate transparency and traceability challenge the same day.

    The question for your business

    Which of our products use ARA, who originally produced it, and can we explain which lots are included or excluded?

    What to do

    Trace ARA through oil blends and intermediaries to finished products. Verify supplier statements and make the affected-lot explanation clear, dated and consistent across markets.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: A supplier or lot match warrants containment, testing and a product-safety assessment. Documented exclusion supports a different response from an unresolved connection.

    EvidenceCS078CS079

  16. 16InvestigateSources: Recalls · Government

    Follow the export route

    A local finding can require action across a distribution boundary.

    What became public

    Singapore reports cereulide in two additional formula batches, directs recalls and stops exports from a local manufacturer using the same raw material.

    The question for your business

    Do implicated materials or products leave our market through another manufacturing site, distributor or export channel?

    What to do

    What to do

    Check the named production and material links against distribution records. Apply the relevant recall or export direction where the company is in scope.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: Contain matched products and coordinate the corresponding market and export response.

    EvidenceCS140

  17. 17InvestigateSources: Stakeholders

    Account for the decisions

    Stakeholder questions expose gaps in the decision record.

    What became public

    An NGO letter asks when ARA contamination was identified, what suppliers disclosed, why the December recall was limited, and what contamination and illness information existed.

    The question for your business

    Can we reconstruct who received each result, what was checked and why the scope of action changed?

    What to do

    What to do

    Preserve test results, notifications and decision logs. Reconcile supplier, authority, customer and public communications against the same dated fact pattern.

    EvidenceCS081

  18. 18InvestigateSources: Government · Recalls

    Beyond one manufacturer

    A shared ingredient becomes a sector-wide assessment task.

    What became public

    French authorities describe Chinese-supplied ARA-rich oil, a second manufacturer's recall and the need for users of the ingredient to assess marketed lots.

    The question for your business

    Can we account for the original producer, intermediaries and every potentially exposed finished-product lot?

    What to do

    What to do

    Complete the relevant lot-level risk assessment and authority engagement. Resolve uncertain supplier lineage, including oil blends and contract manufacturing; act on traced exposure, adverse assessment or applicable authority direction.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: Contain implicated material and determine withdrawals or recalls with the incident team and relevant authority, using product and exposure evidence.

    EvidenceCS050

  19. 19ActTurning pointSources: Government

    A supplier-specific direction

    A clear authority direction applies to users of the implicated oil.

    What became public

    In a parliamentary answer, the French minister says users of the implicated Chinese ARA oil have been ordered to analyse received oil lots and assess potentially exposed formula.

    The question for your business

    Do we use the implicated source, or is our traceability too incomplete to exclude it?

    What to do

    Carry out the relevant oil and formula analyses, complete lot assessments and provide results to the authorities. Take product action where exposure or the assessment warrants it.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: Suspected dangerous or confirmed affected lots require the corresponding withdrawal or recall response.

    EvidenceCS083

  20. 20ActSources: Government

    Reassess French lots

    A changed exposure value can change a previous decision.

    What became public

    France lowers its working infant exposure value to 0.014 micrograms per kilogram of body weight and calls for its immediate use in manufacturer assessments.

    The question for your business

    Would a potentially exposed product assessed under the earlier value now need a different response in France?

    What to do

    What to do

    Recalculate the relevant lots using the authority's assumptions and current analytical results. Document changes to the assessment and take the corresponding product action.

    EvidenceCS057

  21. 21ActSources: Science · Government

    An infant-specific basis

    Put the toxin result in the infant's exposure context.

    What became public

    EFSA publicly announces an infant acute reference dose and formula concentrations that may exceed it under high-consumption assumptions. The journal assessment follows on 4 February.

    The question for your business

    What does a measured concentration imply after reconstitution and infant consumption are taken into account?

    What to do

    What to do

    Update the assessment of potentially exposed products. Check units, preparation factors, analytical sensitivity and consumption assumptions before deciding on product action.

    EvidenceCS058

  22. 22ActSources: Government

    A national testing direction

    An authority requirement can create an immediate control task.

    What became public

    China’s regulator directs infant-formula producers to test for emetic toxin and strengthen incoming-material and finished-product controls, while reporting completion of the domestic recall.

    The question for your business

    Are our manufacturing operations within this direction, and can we demonstrate the required testing and release controls?

    What to do

    What to do

    For covered operations, implement the authority’s requirements and retain the supporting analytical and supplier evidence. Resolve the relevant method and sampling limitations.

    EvidenceCS153

  23. 23InvestigateSources: Government · Recalls

    Retained packs change the picture

    Reassuring market samples do not settle a household finding.

    What became public

    Swiss authorities report no detectable cereulide in 30 market samples but positives in two of three family-held samples. They require reviews of response speed, testing and supplier oversight.

    The question for your business

    Are complaint-linked retained packs, market samples and supplier data being considered separately, with their different sampling contexts?

    What to do

    What to do

    Preserve relevant retained products and trace their lots. Investigate a positive or unresolved complaint-linked sample even when current market sampling is negative.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: A relevant positive retained pack can justify reopening containment, lot scope and exposure assessment.

    EvidenceCS196

  24. 24InvestigateSources: Government · Recalls

    The chain is reconstructed

    Use the fuller history to test the boundaries of the recall.

    What became public

    The joint EFSA–ECDC assessment connects manufacturers, ingredients, retrospective batch findings and clinical reports. It assesses current EU exposure as low following the recalls, while retaining diagnostic and traceability uncertainties.

    The question for your business

    Does the expanded chain reveal an intermediary, base powder, finished product or market our earlier check missed?

    What to do

    What to do

    Reconcile the public trace-back with the company's own ingredient genealogy and recall scope. Verify effectiveness and investigate any new match.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: An additional traceable match may require widening the incident response. A manufacturer with documented exclusion can continue monitoring the remaining uncertainties.

    EvidenceCS064CS040CS054

  25. 25ActSources: Government

    An import obligation

    The ingredient now has a specific import-control requirement.

    What became public

    The EU measure published the previous day takes effect for covered Chinese-origin ARA oil. It adds certification, laboratory documentation and increased official checks. The analytical instructions specify water addition for powdered ARA oil.

    The question for your business

    Are our imports in scope, and can we verify original origin rather than only the location of an intermediary?

    What to do

    What to do

    Apply the relevant certification, analytical and import controls, including transition provisions. Verify original origin and the required sample preparation; powdered ARA oil has an explicit water-addition instruction.

    EvidenceCS065

  26. 26InvestigateSources: Government · Recalls

    Check the global reach

    A global snapshot tests the reach of the response.

    What became public

    WHO reports distribution to 99 countries and territories and assesses global risk as moderate, citing vulnerable infants and gaps in traceability, detection and recall effectiveness.

    The question for your business

    Have exports, distributors, online sales and markets beyond the initial recall region been covered?

    What to do

    What to do

    Reconcile the relevant international distribution chain, check recall reach and pursue unresolved product or supplier matches.

    EvidenceCS067CS064

  27. 27InvestigateSources: Government · Recalls

    A survey is not permanent clearance

    Continued surveillance can find products beyond an earlier survey.

    What became public

    Singapore finds another positive infant-formula batch and a positive toddler formula after an earlier survey of products at major retailers. No new compatible cases are reported in that update.

    The question for your business

    Have our monitoring and traceability checks covered later stock, additional channels and relevant adjacent product categories?

    What to do

    What to do

    Revisit the scope where new products or distribution links appear. Check whether an earlier negative survey still answers the current product question.

    EvidenceCS156

  28. 28WatchSources: Government

    Evidence can narrow scope

    Return to monitoring only when your own connection is resolved.

    What became public

    Dutch authorities report that follow-up of complaints about other formula found no measurable cereulide and no further products linked to the contaminated ARA. No new recalls resulted from that investigation.

    The question for your business

    Have our own supplier and lot checks excluded exposure, and have the relevant control questions been resolved?

    What to do

    What to do

    For a business with documented exclusion, maintain targeted monitoring and clear reopening triggers. Keep active incident management where a match or traceability gap remains.

    EvidenceCS068CS066

  29. 29ActSources: Government · Recalls

    Exposure changes the lot decision

    A product result becomes an infant-exposure assessment.

    What became public

    An updated Czech notice describes a toxin-positive first-infant-formula lot and estimated newborn exposure of 0.018 µg/kg body weight, above the 0.014 µg/kg acute reference dose.

    The question for your business

    Does a measured result in our relevant product exceed the health-based assessment when preparation and infant consumption are considered?

    What to do

    What to do

    For implicated products, reassess exposure and carry out the corresponding withdrawal or recall response with the relevant authority. Reconcile the affected lot and market scope.

    EvidenceCS157

  30. 30InvestigateSources: Government · Standards

    A formula-method warning

    An official warning challenges the meaning of a low powder result.

    What became public

    By its 30 April update at the latest, the Austrian authority explains that encapsulated ARA can enclose toxin and that a standard preparation method can produce lower results in powder than in a prepared bottle.

    The question for your business

    Could our relevant low or negative powder results reflect incomplete extraction rather than a genuinely low toxin concentration?

    What to do

    What to do

    Review sample preparation and matrix recovery with the laboratory. Revisit potentially exposed material where the earlier method may not have recovered encapsulated toxin.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: A changed analytical result can change the product assessment; keep traceability and exposure evidence attached to that decision.

    EvidenceCS091

  31. 31InvestigateTurning pointSources: Science · Standards

    Reopen the extraction question

    Published formula validation challenges a low result.

    What became public

    A peer-reviewed study reports roughly fourfold higher response after hydration before acetonitrile extraction. It also evaluates two commercially supplied, naturally incurred formula controls.

    The question for your business

    Could a relevant low or negative result depend on sample preparation that has not demonstrated recovery from the actual contaminated matrix?

    What to do

    Review the preparation method and incurred recovery with the laboratory. Reassess potentially exposed products where the result may have been affected, and arrange appropriate reanalysis.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: A revised analytical result can change the exposure assessment and the need for product action.

    EvidenceCS181

  32. 32InvestigateSources: Science · Standards

    Revisit the negative result

    Peer-reviewed validation strengthens the method-reassessment case.

    What became public

    Following earlier official signals and the May formula study, another peer-reviewed study reports average 14-fold underestimation in the studied powdered formula contaminated through oil when using acetonitrile-only extraction. Water-assisted extraction improves recovery in the evaluated matrices.

    The question for your business

    Did our relevant negative or low results use an extraction procedure shown to recover toxin from this actual matrix?

    What to do

    What to do

    Review method fitness with the laboratory. Where potentially exposed material was tested using a susceptible procedure, reassess the results and consider reanalysis with appropriately validated extraction.

    If your own exposure is confirmed: A revised result or newly established exposure may change the product decision. Treat an assay's standard designation as a starting point for matrix validation.

    EvidenceCS181CS099

  33. 33InvestigateSources: Science · Standards

    Oil and powder need different preparation

    ARA-specific validation sharpens the incoming-test question.

    What became public

    A peer-reviewed study develops separate preparations for ARA oil and microencapsulated ARA powder. The powder method includes hydration; validation uses blank materials spiked at three concentrations.

    The question for your business

    Does the laboratory distinguish liquid oil from encapsulated powder, and what proves that it recovers naturally incorporated toxin?

    What to do

    What to do

    Review the matrix-specific method, decision-level performance and incoming-control requirements. Seek incurred-material evidence where spike recovery does not resolve the concern.

    EvidenceCS182

  34. 34ActTurning pointSources: Government · Recalls

    A later lot reopens the issue

    A new positive can change scope even below an intervention value.

    What became public

    Polish authorities report cereulide in one formula production cycle below the stated intervention threshold. Repeated-use concerns could not be excluded, and the immediately adjacent lot was also recalled.

    The question for your business

    Does a new positive, repeated-consumption assessment or adjacent production link challenge the boundaries of our earlier decision?

    What to do

    Investigate the production sequence and relevant exposure pattern. For affected lots, follow the authority response and reassess whether the scope should include connected production.

    EvidenceCS158

  35. 35WatchSources: Government

    Prepare for a proposal

    Track the proposed product criterion separately from current duties.

    What became public

    The Commission opens feedback on a proposed cereulide criterion for specified dried infant products. It was still a draft on 25 September.

    The question for your business

    Would the proposed product scope, sampling plan and analytical requirements change our specifications or laboratory readiness?

    What to do

    What to do

    Assess the proposal and track its development. Continue to apply current food-safety duties and any applicable ingredient-import controls.

    EvidenceCS071CS065

  36. 36WatchSources: Government

    Feedback closes; adoption remains ahead

    A closed consultation is not an adopted rule.

    What became public

    The Commission feedback period closes. Its initiative page still lists adoption for the first quarter of 2027 when checked on 20 October.

    The question for your business

    Are we tracking the final text without treating the proposal as binding?

    What to do

    What to do

    Monitor adoption and the final scope, testing requirements and application date. Keep existing obligations separate.

    EvidenceCS071

  37. 37ActSources: Incident

    Recalled stock returns to sale

    Recall controls must prevent a return to shelves.

    What became public

    CAFIA reports that previously recalled Nutrilon products reappeared at Kaufland. The retailer removed them on 9 October; inspectors checked on 14 October.

    The question for your business

    Can returned or blocked lots re-enter our saleable stock?

    What to do

    What to do

    Match the notice to stock and distribution records. For affected lots, verify segregation, sale blocks and recall completion.

    EvidenceCS230

Each point is dated to when its evidence became public, or to when a published rule took effect.

Where the watchlist begins

The 1994 evidence supports a place on the infant-food hazard radar. By January 2006, a study connects cereulide-producing strains and toxin formation with infant-food formulations under abuse conditions. Later strain, storage and matrix findings help define what to investigate. The 2021 lipid study sharpens the question of sampling and extracting the toxin in fatty materials.

EvidenceCS003CS004CS014CS030

Where the decision changes

The threshold is conditional. A recall elsewhere warrants checking the connection. A matched ingredient or lot, a positive result in your material or an applicable control requirement can warrant intervention. The next step depends on what is established: hold and investigate, reassess exposure, correct a process, withdraw affected goods or meet an import requirement.

EvidenceCS017CS058CS065

The story is still developing

A quieter incident does not close every question. March follow-up evidence could support a return to monitoring where a business had excluded its own exposure. Method concerns could reopen a testing question. By September, a proposed finished-product criterion created another development to assess. Feedback closed on 29 September. As of 20 October, the Commission still planned adoption for the first quarter of 2027; the criterion remained a proposal.

EvidenceCS068CS091CS099CS071

Regulatory horizon scanning scores new regulatory alerts against your products and markets, with the reason each one matches.

On 15 October, Czech inspectors reported that previously recalled Nutrilon products had returned to Kaufland shelves. This adds a practical question: do recall controls prevent affected stock from being sold again?

EvidenceCS230

A review published on 13 October also supports checking upstream ingredients and testing for the toxin itself. It synthesises existing evidence and reports no new experiments.

EvidenceCS231

Scientific literature monitoring helps your team follow new papers on the substances and endpoints it watches.

A direct product or supplier connection can warrant action before the full incident history, or a new rule, is available.

We found no public warning before the incident that named ARA oil as a route for cereulide. The earlier science raised the right questions. It did not predict this incident.

02Tests and thresholds

Which test.Which threshold.

Three findings in the record change how a result should be read: what a test measures, what an extraction recovers and how much exposure counts as too much.

Figure 2 · What each test answers

A compliant count cannot rule out the toxin.

The bacteria, the genes that make cereulide and the toxin itself each need a different test. Only the last one measures cereulide.

  1. 01The organism

    CFU/g

    How many presumptive Bacillus cereus cells grow from a gram of product.

    • A 1994 survey found B. cereus in about 54% of 261 infant and dried-milk products from 17 countries, at 0.3 to 600 CFU/g.
    • Since 2007, EU law has set a process-hygiene criterion for dried infant formula: n=5, c=1, m=50, M=500 CFU/g at the end of manufacture.

    What it cannot tell you

    Whether cereulide has already formed. A compliant count does not show the toxin is absent.

    EvidenceCS003CS017CS010

  2. 02The strain

    ces

    Whether a strain carries the genes that make cereulide.

    • Researchers identified the cereulide synthetase genes in 2005, and a PCR test built on them picked out toxin-producing strains.
    • By 2007, a real-time version identified emetic strains within two hours in outbreak material.

    What it cannot tell you

    Whether toxin formed in a released product. A positive strain shows potential, not a dose.

    EvidenceCS011CS016

  3. 03The toxin

    µg/kg

    How much cereulide is in the sample, measured by LC-MS/MS.

    • An international ISO method for measuring cereulide in food was published in 2017.
    • In December 2024, an FDA method listed infant formula among its validation matrices.

    What it cannot tell you

    Whether the extraction reached all of the toxin. That depends on the product, as Figure 3 shows.

    EvidenceCS026CS034

Heat kills the bacteria. It does not remove the toxin.

In a 2008 study, cereulide kept its activity at every temperature tested. Ordinary heat treatment cannot be relied on once the toxin has formed.

EvidenceCS019

Figure 3 · The extraction question

The same powder. Fourteen times the result.

In powdered formula contaminated through oil, one June 2026 study found that extracting with acetonitrile alone recovered on average a fourteenth of the toxin. Adding water first recovered 94.9 to 115% in the matrices tested.

Average underestimate from one study, not a correction factor for other results. The concern came earlier: from February, EU checks on imported powdered ARA oil had to add water before analysis, and by 30 April Austria's food-safety agency had described lower results in powder than in the prepared bottle. A May study found that hydrating formula first raised the response about fourfold.

EvidenceCS099CS065CS091CS181

Figure 4 · The threshold

Then the threshold more than halved.

In January 2026, France lowered the exposure value manufacturers had to assess against, from 0.03 to 0.014 µg per kg of body weight. EFSA set an acute reference dose for infants at the same level days later. A lot that fell under the old value could exceed the new one.

The values come from different authorities and dates, so the chart shows scale, not one legal test. EFSA also expressed its value as concentrations: above 0.054 µg/L in prepared infant formula, an infant who drinks a lot may exceed it. Belgium set an action limit of 0.43 µg/kg for infant-formula powder, with withdrawal and recall above it.

EvidenceCS057CS058CS157CS062

The scale by March 2026

  • 2 million kg

    of product, approximately, recalled across 18 countries by a manufacturer that reassessed after the EFSA value

    SourceCS063

  • 99

    countries and territories had received affected products, WHO reported on 13 March 2026

    SourceCS067

  • 144

    suspected and confirmed cases in ten countries by the same date. Case definitions differed

    SourceCS067

03The wider watchlist

One story in depth.Seven more to watch.

The same questions apply to other ingredients, packaging and sourcing. Each issue below comes with the change that would call for a closer look.

Research snapshot: 25 September 2026

  1. 01September 2026 guidance

    NIAS in changing packaging

    Material-specific studies and BfR’s NIAS guidance sharpen the assessment questions around changing packaging formulations.

    What would change the assessment?

    A changed formulation, contact temperature or use that falls outside the evidence supporting the current material.

    EvidenceH03-020H03-023H03-026

  2. 022026/27 monitoring plan

    Vibrio in seafood

    The imported-food plan gives pathogenic Vibrio high priority in relevant seafood, alongside EFSA’s assessment of changing environmental conditions.

    What would change the assessment?

    A new origin, season or occurrence signal that challenges the sourcing and sampling assumptions for the seafood being purchased.

    EvidenceH02-012H02-014

  3. 032026 assessment work

    Mycotoxins

    Climate-linked feed and bedding concerns and the Alternaria consultation raise questions about mixtures, occurrence and monitoring scope.

    What would change the assessment?

    New occurrence data in relevant ingredients or origins, or a final assessment that changes the case for the monitoring panel.

    EvidenceH04-032H04-031

  4. 042025 review, published 2026

    Bongkrekic acid

    EFSA’s emerging-risk attention connects an established outbreak history with questions about ingredients and processes in other markets.

    What would change the assessment?

    Evidence that an implicated ingredient or fermentation process is present in the company’s own supply chain.

    EvidenceH05-018H05-007

  5. 05September 2026 proposals

    Seaweed metals and iodine

    The latest package separates proposed metal limits from a draft iodine recommendation, changing the scope to track.

    What would change the assessment?

    A final measure or relevant occurrence evidence that changes the assessment for a particular species, product form or serving pattern.

    EvidenceH06-019H06-025

  6. 062024 code / May 2025 protocol

    Ciguatoxins

    The Codex prevention code and Canary control protocol sit alongside European Atlantic and imported-fish incident histories.

    What would change the assessment?

    A change in fish species or origin, or new occurrence and method evidence that changes the relevant controls.

    EvidenceH07-008H07-018H07-019

  7. 072026 study / August 2026 rules

    PFAS in hot-contact packaging

    A hot-contact migration study and applicable EU packaging-content thresholds create two distinct questions for a packaging assessment.

    What would change the assessment?

    A material or use-condition change, fuller migration evidence, or a gap in demonstrating compliance with the relevant content limits.

    EvidenceH08-019H08-020

Two more histories.The same decision question.

Packaging and Vibrio, set beside cereulide. Read across a row to compare the same phase in three histories.

Packaging

Vibrio

Cereulide

01Baseline

Packaging · Baseline

A known assessment duty.

The evidence
EU plastics rules explicitly address NIAS, alongside the wider requirement to prevent harmful migration.
The connection
An unidentified migrant is already an assessment question. A material change needs to be considered within that existing duty.
A decision to consider
Establish the formulation and intended contact conditions that the supporting assessment covers.

EvidenceH03-004H03-007

Vibrio · Baseline

An outbreak challenges an old geographic assumption.

The evidence
The Alaska oyster-outbreak report is published, describing illness during the summer of 2004.
The connection
A familiar seafood pathogen has become relevant to an unusually northern production setting.
A decision to consider
Examine harvest conditions and cold-chain assumptions for the relevant seafood source.

EvidenceH02-004

Cereulide · Baseline

Known toxin, bacterial process criterion.

The evidence
Cereulide has been characterised; the EU introduces an infant-formula process criterion for presumptive B. cereus.
The connection
Toxin knowledge and a bacterial process-hygiene criterion are related, but they answer different questions.
A decision to consider
Understand what the existing process criterion measures and the scope of the evidence supporting it.

EvidenceH01-001H01-005

02New evidence

Packaging · New evidence

A formulation-specific result makes the question concrete.

The evidence
A PLA/PHB study reports plasticiser migration into model solutions and a food trial.
The connection
The broad material label does not answer which substances migrate in the intended use.
A decision to consider
Check how closely the study’s formulation, food and contact conditions match the proposed packaging.

EvidenceH03-026

Vibrio · New evidence

A wider assessment connects environment and exposure.

The evidence
EFSA publishes its EU seafood assessment, including the influence of climate and gaps in occurrence data.
The connection
The earlier geographic question now sits inside a broader assessment of conditions affecting seafood exposure.
A decision to consider
Review which origins, seasons and products warrant closer monitoring.

EvidenceH02-012

Cereulide · New evidence

A shared ingredient connects the incident.

The evidence
EFSA’s infant assessment and the joint outbreak assessment are public. Special controls on Chinese ARA oil enter into force.
The connection
The records connect toxin, vulnerable population, ingredient and import-control scope.
A decision to consider
Trace relevant ingredients and products; distinguish the scientific advice from the enacted ingredient controls.

EvidenceH01-011H01-008H01-013

03Decision point

Packaging · Decision point

Several sources point to an assessment gap.

The evidence
EFSA’s emerging-risk designation, recycled-paper research and BfR’s September guidance are now available.
The connection
Material-transition questions recur across research and assessment, but the material categories and evidence types remain distinct.
A decision to consider
Prioritise a review of evidence for changed materials and uses, including uncertainty about unidentified migrants.

EvidenceH03-020H03-025H03-023

Vibrio · Decision point

Monitoring priorities make the issue operational.

The evidence
The 2026/27 imported-food plan prioritises pathogenic Vibrio in relevant seafood categories.
The connection
The scientific exposure question can now be read alongside an explicit monitoring priority.
A decision to consider
Compare the supply chain and sampling plan with the relevant product categories and named pathogens.

EvidenceH02-014H02-013

Cereulide · Decision point

A further response is proposed.

The evidence
A finished-formula cereulide criterion appears in the later Ares draft, distinct from the ingredient-import measure.
The connection
The emerging policy response extends the questions from ingredient controls to finished-product criteria.
A decision to consider
Assess the proposal’s product scope and implications while tracking whether and how it is adopted.

EvidenceH01-014H01-013

04What Foresight makes possible

Find the signal.Explain the decision.

The value of the investigation is a traceable link between new evidence and a question about the company's own products.
01

Connect what arrives separately.

A scientific paper, a recall notice, an NGO question and an import rule rarely arrive together. Foresight Assistant helped find their connections, follow references and check the sources behind them. Every record keeps its date and its source.

That makes a more precise question possible: do we need to review a method, trace an ingredient, reassess a lot or prepare for a proposed rule?

02

Check what the signal really supports.

Checking the sources changed the story. The December recalls did not name ARA oil. A manufacturer's account of finding the toxin in November only became public in January. The June method study confirmed concerns authorities had already raised.

An NGO question is a reason to look, not a finding. The same report repeated in many places is still one source. Knowing this helps a team decide how much weight a signal deserves.

The next useful signal is the one that changes your next decision.

For cereulide, early science justified attention and preparation. A product or supplier connection made the incident relevant. Testing and exposure evidence shaped the response. Foresight can help assemble and check those connections. The company's own traceability, results and responsibilities decide the action.

05The cereulide evidence library

Every record.Every source.

230 records across scientific literature, standards, recalls, stakeholder discussion and government response. Open a record to read what it found and where it came from.

Each record carries its label from the story: watch, investigate or act. An Act record can concern testing, communication or an import rule. It does not always mean a recall.

Decision label
230 of 230 evidence records
  1. CS001
    Fried-rice emetic illness episodes linked to Bacillus cereus

    Five episodes affected 13 people; rapid nausea and vomiting followed fried rice held at room temperature, and control of cooling and batch-mixing practices stopped high counts.

    25 May 1974Scientific literatureWatch

  2. CS105
    An autopsy case of food poisoning associated with Bacillus cereus

    an 11-year-old died about 15 hours after noodles; autopsy found gastroenteritis and fatty degeneration, and B. cereus was isolated.

    Mar 1976Scientific literatureWatch

  3. CS106
    Properties and production characteristics of vomiting, diarrhoeal and necrotizing toxins of Bacillus cereus

    the emetic factor was distinguished from diarrhoeal toxins and described as a highly stable compound under 5 kDa.

    Jan 1979Scientific literatureWatch

  4. CS002
    Toxin production by dairy isolates in milk at low temperatures

    Dairy B. cereus isolates produced diarrhoeal toxin in milk under some low-temperature conditions, showing that dairy adaptation and toxin phenotype require strain-level attention.

    Oct 1989Scientific literatureWatch

  5. CS004
    Isolation and chemical characterisation of cereulide

    A chemically pure cyclic dodecadepsipeptide was isolated from an emetic B. cereus culture and named cereulide; MS, NMR and degradation established its structure.

    Aug 1994Scientific literatureWatch

  6. CS003
    Bacillus cereus occurrence in infant foods and dried milk products

    Among 261 products from 17 countries, approximately 54% contained B. cereus at 0.3–600 CFU/g; low counts could multiply after reconstitution and room-temperature storage.

    Sept 1994Scientific literatureInvestigate

  7. CS005
    Demonstration that cereulide causes emesis

    The 1995 publication identifies cereulide as responsible for emetic activity.

    Jun 1995Scientific literatureWatch

  8. CS208
    Structure and stereochemistry of cereulide

    Established cereulide as a 36-membered cyclic depsipeptide and characterised its stereochemistry and alkali-metal complexation, with selectivity for potassium and rubidium.

    1995Scientific literatureWatch

  9. CS006
    Maltodextrin-supported growth and diarrhoeal enterotoxin in infant formula

    Of 100 reconstituted formula samples, 63 supported B. cereus growth after 14 hours at 25°C; four maltodextrin-containing samples yielded diarrhoeal enterotoxin.

    Mar 1997Scientific literatureInvestigate

  10. CS007
    Fulminant liver failure associated with B. cereus emetic toxin

    A 17-year-old developed fatal liver failure and rhabdomyolysis after contaminated food; mitochondrial fatty-acid oxidation impairment was implicated.

    17 Apr 1997Scientific literatureWatch

  11. CS008
    Boar-sperm bioassay for emetic toxin

    Loss of sperm motility provided a sensitive bioassay for cereulide-like toxin; non-emetic strains remained negative even at much higher cell concentrations.

    Apr 1998Standards & methodsInvestigate

  12. CS209
    Semiautomated metabolic staining assay for emetic toxin

    Developed a quantitative HEp-2 MTT assay whose titres correlated with transient vacuolation; seven of 13 tested B. cereus strains were positive, while tested other species were negative.

    1 Apr 1999Scientific literatureWatch

  13. CS107
    Pathological effect of synthetic cereulide, an emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus, is reversible in mice

    synthetic cereulide caused dose-related mouse liver pathology that subsequently receded, supporting reversibility within the study design.

    May 1999Scientific literatureInvestigate

  14. CS108
    Ionophoretic properties and mitochondrial effects of cereulide: the emetic toxin of B. cereus

    cereulide was highly selective for potassium, collapsed mitochondrial membrane potential and stimulated potassium-dependent swelling and respiration.

    Jul 1999Scientific literatureInvestigate

  15. CS109
    Bacillus cereus produces most emetic toxin at lower temperatures

    seven emetic strains were examined in skim-milk medium over 10–40°C; toxin was detected from about 12–37°C and the bioassay suggested substantial production at lower temperatures.

    Nov 2000Scientific literatureInvestigate

  16. CS110
    Production of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin (cereulide) in various foods

    cereulide was quantified in 13 of 14 outbreak foods; farinaceous foods supported high production, while non-aerated milk and soya milk supported small quantities.

    24 Oct 2001Scientific literatureInvestigate

  17. CS210
    Quantitative cereulide production under controlled conditions

    HPLC-ion-trap MS detected 10 pg per injection; toxin began after logarithmic growth, was independent of sporulation, increased strongly with shaking, was high at 21°C and minimal at ≤8°C or 40°C.

    1 May 2002Scientific literatureInvestigate

  18. CS111
    Bacillus cereus emetic toxin production in relation to dissolved oxygen tension and sporulation

    toxin activity was much lower in static culture, absent anaerobically, and not correlated with spore count.

    18 Sept 2002Scientific literatureInvestigate

  19. CS009
    In-vitro assay for human toxicity of cereulide

    Cereulide caused mitochondrial membrane-potential loss in human cell lines at concentrations similar to those affecting boar sperm; LC-MS and bioassay estimates agreed in implicated food.

    Oct 2003Scientific literatureInvestigate

  20. CS112
    Atmospheric oxygen and other conditions affecting the production of cereulide by Bacillus cereus in food

    oxygen strongly promoted toxin formation; leucine and valine increased production, and boiling did not remove preformed toxin.

    25 May 2004Scientific literatureInvestigate

  21. CS010
    ISO colony-count method for presumptive Bacillus cereus

    Standardised enumeration at 30°C, while explicitly limiting identification to presumptive B. cereus because closely related group members are not distinguished.

    16 Jun 2004Standards & methodsWatch

  22. CS211
    Evolutionary lineage of cereulide-producing strains

    Multiple typing methods placed the tested emetic isolates in one low-diversity cluster; they were typically starch- and salicin-negative, weakly haemolytic and Hbl-negative.

    1 Jan 2005Scientific literatureInvestigate

  23. CS011
    Identification of the cereulide synthetase gene and ces PCR

    Gene disruption produced cereulide-deficient mutants, and a ces-targeted PCR was specific to cereulide-producing strains across the tested panels.

    Jan 2005Scientific literatureInvestigate

  24. CS012
    European assessment of Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus species in food

    The assessment treated temperature control and HACCP as major controls, recognised dehydrated foods and fragile consumers, and informed the later infant-formula process criterion.

    Apr 2005Government & assessmentInvestigate

  25. CS113
    Fatal family outbreak of Bacillus cereus-associated food poisoning

    five siblings became ill after stored pasta salad and a seven-year-old died with liver failure; emetic isolates were demonstrated.

    Aug 2005Scientific literatureAct

  26. CS114
    Occurrence of emetic toxin producing Bacillus cereus in the dairy production chain

    verified emetic producers were rare across a large Swedish dairy-chain isolate collection, although local clonal amplification occurred.

    19 Sept 2005Scientific literatureWatch

  27. CS015
    ISO low-number presumptive Bacillus cereus method

    Introduced MPN detection and enumeration for low numbers of viable presumptive B. cereus in foods and production environments.

    13 Jan 2006Standards & methodsWatch

  28. CS014
    Cereulide production in selected infant-food formulations

    Cereulide-producing B. cereus was isolated from commercial infant foods; inoculated reconstituted foods accumulated 2–200 µg cereulide per 100 mL during 24 hours unrefrigerated, with cereal-dairy formulations most supportive.

    19 Jan 2006Scientific literatureInvestigate

  29. CS013
    Distinct growth and heat-resistance traits of emetic strains

    Seventeen emetic strains did not grow below 10°C in this collection, grew at 48°C and had higher average spore heat resistance than non-emetic strains.

    24 Feb 2006Scientific literatureInvestigate

  30. CS212
    Cereulide synthetase locus and megaplasmid location

    Defined the seven-gene 24 kb cesHPTABCD cluster and placed it on a pXO1-like megaplasmid; non-emetic related strains could contain similar plasmid backbones without the ces locus.

    2 Mar 2006Scientific literatureInvestigate

  31. CS115
    Bacillus cereus is common in the environment but emetic toxin producing isolates are rare

    environmental B. cereus was common but emetic-toxin-producing isolates were rare.

    2006Scientific literatureWatch

  32. CS213
    Psychrotolerant cereulide-producing B. weihenstephanensis

    Two soil isolates grew at 6°C and produced measured cereulide at 8°C; absolute output at 8–15°C was low, while output at 25°C was much higher.

    1 Jul 2006Scientific literatureInvestigate

  33. CS116
    Toxicological profile of cereulide, the Bacillus cereus emetic toxin, in functional assays with human, animal and bacterial cells

    purified cereulide was highly cytotoxic in sensitive cell assays, while genotoxicity and Ames tests were negative below cytotoxic concentrations.

    27 Oct 2006Scientific literatureInvestigate

  34. CS214
    Computer-assisted sperm-motility assay across foods

    Common enterotoxins, several mycotoxins and preservatives did not interfere at relevant concentrations; seven of 14 foods supported detectable toxin despite 11 reaching >8 log CFU/g, and 10 of 33 suspect samples were positive.

    15 Dec 2006Scientific literatureWatch

  35. CS215
    Complete sequence of the cereulide-encoding plasmid

    Complete sequencing identified pCER270 as an approximately 270 kb pXO1-like plasmid carrying the ces cluster and showed substantial unique DNA relative to other pXO1-like plasmids.

    1 Jan 2007Scientific literatureInvestigate

  36. CS016
    Real-time PCR for emetic Bacillus cereus in foods

    A ces-targeted real-time PCR identified emetic B. cereus within two hours in tested outbreak materials and distinguished it from another emesis-causing pathogen.

    26 Jan 2007Standards & methodsInvestigate

  37. CS017
    EU presumptive Bacillus cereus process criterion for dried infant formula

    For dried infant formula and specified medical foods for infants under six months, n=5, c=1, m=50 and M=500 CFU/g at end of manufacture; actions are production-hygiene improvement, recontamination prevention and raw-material selection.

    7 Dec 2007Government & assessmentAct

  38. CS019
    Heat resistance of cereulide

    Cereulide retained remarkable activity after testing at 100°C, 121°C and 150°C; apparent loss at highly alkaline pH could reverse, so ordinary food heat treatments could not be relied on for inactivation.

    18 Mar 2008Scientific literatureInvestigate

  39. CS131
    Environment-driven cereulide production by emetic strains of Bacillus cereus

    seven strains showed strong matrix- and strain-dependent toxin production; skim/raw-milk agars generally supported low toxin despite growth, and potassium-to-sodium ratio, glycine and sodium were predictive variables.

    12 Jun 2008Scientific literatureInvestigate

  40. CS018
    Codex code for powdered formula manufacture, ingredients and preparation

    Classified B. cereus causality through powdered formula as not demonstrated at the time, while requiring HACCP-based incoming-ingredient controls, supplier verification, dry-area hygiene, environmental monitoring and prompt use or refrigeration after reconstitution.

    2008Standards & methodsWatch

  41. CS216
    Higher-order structure and metal complexation

    Cereulide and valinomycin had similar higher-order frameworks, but cereulide showed stronger metal complexation and potassium-selective ionophore activity at lower concentrations.

    28 Apr 2009Scientific literatureWatch

  42. CS217
    Diversity of cereulide-producing B. cereus group strains

    Seventy-three potential emetic isolates were found; none of 460 tested B. thuringiensis, B. mycoides or B. pseudomycoides were PCR-positive, and a psychrotolerant producer cluster showed variable chromosomal/plasmid ces location.

    18 May 2009Scientific literatureInvestigate

  43. CS020
    Stable-isotope dilution analysis for cereulide

    A 13C6-cereulide internal standard improved matrix correction and produced recovery of 104–111% in tested rice matrices, outperforming valinomycin as surrogate standard.

    8 Dec 2009Standards & methodsInvestigate

  44. CS021
    LC-MS quantification using synthetic cereulide standard

    Synthetic cereulide showed biological activity and enabled reliable LC-MS quantification with recovery near 100% across tested foods; valinomycin produced systematically different estimates.

    Oct 2010Standards & methodsInvestigate

  45. CS132
    Inhibition of cereulide toxin synthesis by emetic Bacillus cereus via long-chain polyphosphates

    polyphosphate blends reduced toxin synthesis independently of growth at low levels and reduced measured toxin in inoculated reconstituted infant food and oat milk.

    8 Feb 2011Scientific literatureInvestigate

  46. CS218
    Cereulide production in stored pasta

    At 25°C, toxin reached about 500 ng/g by day three and approximately 1,000 ng/g by day seven; no toxin was detected at 4°C, while one strain gave a below-LOQ signal after two days at 8°C.

    6 Mar 2011Scientific literatureInvestigate

  47. CS159
    LC-MS/MS analysis of cereulide in processed cereal foods and milk powder

    fortified infant milk powder and three foods achieved estimated LOQ ≤1 µg/kg with reported trueness and precision.

    25 Oct 2011Standards & methodsInvestigate

  48. CS117
    Sudden death of a young adult associated with Bacillus cereus food poisoning

    five-day room-temperature spaghetti contained 14.8 µg/g measured cereulide and was associated with sudden adult death.

    Dec 2011Scientific literatureAct

  49. CS160
    Tandem-MS determination of cereulide in food products

    valinomycin-calibrated LC-MS² validation was principally in rice, with 0.5 ng-equivalent/g detection and 77–101% recoveries.

    17 Dec 2011Standards & methodsInvestigate

  50. CS219
    Cereulide-like paenilides from a psychrotolerant organism

    Paenibacillus tundrae produced paenilide/homopaenilide from 5–28°C; the compounds were potassium ionophores with mammalian-cell toxicity similar to cereulide but the organism was cesB-negative.

    24 Apr 2012Scientific literatureInvestigate

  51. CS220
    Reversible acute liver failure after emetic-type food poisoning

    A 15-year-old developed reversible fulminant liver failure with rhabdomyolysis after pasta consumption; the authors argued recognition of B. cereus could prevent unnecessary transplantation.

    1 May 2012Scientific literatureInvestigate

  52. CS161
    Cereulide prevalence in restaurant rice dishes

    rice-dish toxin prevalence increased after 25°C storage, showing sample handling can alter measured status.

    14 Aug 2012Scientific literatureInvestigate

  53. CS221
    Mass-spectrometric profiling of cereulide production

    UPLC-TOF profiling separated strains into no/low, medium and high producers, confirmed selected samples by isotope-dilution LC-MS/MS, and found differences from HEp-2 assay classifications.

    19 Oct 2012Scientific literatureInvestigate

  54. CS222
    qPCR differentiation of emetic and non-emetic strains in milk

    Multiplex qPCR combined gyrB, 16S and ces targets with an internal control; artificial-milk LOD was approximately 1.91×10³ spores/mL with mean recovery 81%.

    19 Nov 2012Scientific literatureWatch

  55. CS162
    Rapid quantitative LC-MS/MS detection in foods

    rapid LC-MS/MS gave 0.1 ng/mL LOD and 0.5 ng/mL LOQ, with full precision data principally for boiled rice.

    28 Nov 2012Standards & methodsWatch

  56. CS023
    Potentially enterotoxigenic B. cereus in infant milk powder

    B. cereus isolates from powdered infant milk carried one or more enterotoxin genes; the investigation focused on HBL, NHE and CytK rather than cereulide.

    19 Apr 2013Scientific literatureInvestigate

  57. CS022
    B. cereus and enterotoxin genes in infant foods

    In 200 sampled infant foods, 84 were B. cereus-positive at 30–93 spores/g; enterotoxin genes were common, but cereulide or ces was not measured.

    27 May 2013Scientific literatureInvestigate

  58. CS223
    Potato endophytes producing measured cereulide

    Six potato-tuber isolates produced 1–100 ng cereulide/mg wet biomass; purified toxin depolarised several mammalian-cell mitochondria, and 30–60 ng/mL induced rapid cellular potassium loss.

    28 May 2013Scientific literatureInvestigate

  59. CS224
    Rapid real-time PCR for emetic strains in foods

    TaqMan and SYBR assays targeting ces identified tested emetic strains within 1–1.5 h; suggested food detection limit was 10⁴–10⁵ CFU/g.

    24 Dec 2013Scientific literatureWatch

  60. CS118
    Emetic Bacillus cereus are more volatile than thought: recent foodborne outbreaks and prevalence studies in Bavaria (2007–2013)

    reporter assays found broad emetic-strain food distribution and strong promoter activity in several reconstituted dairy/cereal infant-food models.

    8 May 2014Scientific literatureInvestigate

  61. CS225
    Genomic mobility of the cereulide locus

    ces clusters occurred on plasmids and chromosomes; a putative Tnces arrangement was identified in psychrotolerant isolates, and a marked derivative transposed in E. coli.

    7 Jun 2014Scientific literatureInvestigate

  62. CS226
    Liver transplantation after cereulide-associated multi-organ failure

    Reported a first lifesaving emergency hepatectomy and subsequent liver transplant for severe liver failure and rhabdomyolysis attributed to cereulide intoxication.

    17 Oct 2014Scientific literatureInvestigate

  63. CS119
    An emetic Bacillus cereus outbreak in a kindergarten: detection and quantification of critical levels of cereulide toxin

    20 toddlers developed vomiting and leftovers contained cereulide up to 4.2 µg/g.

    2 Dec 2014Scientific literatureAct

  64. CS163
    Quantitative UPLC-MS/MS using native and isotope-labelled standards

    isotope dilution delivered 1 ng/g LOQ in rice/pasta and showed valinomycin would understate cereulide roughly twofold under study conditions.

    11 Dec 2014Standards & methodsInvestigate

  65. CS120
    Chemodiversity of cereulide, the emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus

    Marxen, Stark, Frenzel and co-authors identified at least 18 variants including isocereulides A–G; purified isocereulide A was about eightfold more cytotoxic than cereulide in HEp-2 cells.

    10 Feb 2015Scientific literatureInvestigate

  66. CS164
    LC-MS/MS determination in pasta, rice and cream

    amylase pretreatment improved extraction and reproducibility in starch-rich pasta/rice; method also covered cream.

    20 Mar 2015Standards & methodsInvestigate

  67. CS227
    Depsipeptide intermediates in cereulide biosynthesis

    Identified di-, tetra-, hexa-, octa-, deca- and dodecadepsipeptide intermediates and proposed cooperative CesA/CesB assembly inconsistent with a simpler canonical NRPS model.

    27 May 2015Scientific literatureWatch

  68. CS165
    Multiparametric quantitation of cereulide and isocereulides A–G

    SIDA quantified cereulide and isocereulides A–G with sub-ng/g sensitivity and applied the method to suspicious noodles.

    Sept 2015Standards & methodsInvestigate

  69. CS228
    Multiple-level control of cereulide synthesis

    CesH affected transcription, redundant phosphopantetheinyl transferases supported NRPS activation, and CesCD deletion abolished measured cereulide despite continued NRPS expression.

    13 Oct 2015Scientific literatureInvestigate

  70. CS024
    Viable enterotoxin-producing B. cereus detection in infant-formula powder

    PMA-multiplex PCR detected viable cells carrying cytK, nheA and hblD after enrichment at about 22 CFU/g in spiked foods, including milk powder; it did not target ces or cereulide.

    10 Dec 2015Scientific literatureInvestigate

  71. CS121
    Evaluation of the toxicity and toxicokinetics of cereulide from an emetic Bacillus cereus strain of milk origin

    a raw-milk isolate was a high cereulide producer; intravenous rabbit testing gave a mean elimination half-life of 10.8 hours.

    6 Jun 2016Scientific literatureInvestigate

  72. CS025
    Updated European assessment of the B. cereus group

    EFSA stated that routine presumptive counts do not resolve group members, cereulide may coexist with low cell counts, no commonly used industrial control inactivates the toxin, and growth, toxin formation and risk are strain- and matrix-dependent.

    20 Jul 2016Government & assessmentInvestigate

  73. CS166
    Simultaneous determination of cereulide, beauvericin and enniatins

    multi-analyte LC-MS/MS was validated across maize, wheat, rice and pasta with 84–106% recovery.

    4 Oct 2016Standards & methodsWatch

  74. CS122
    Temperature exerts control of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin production on post-transcriptional levels

    four strains produced maximal parent toxin around 33–37°C; production nearly ceased at 43–46°C, while relative isocereulide A was highest at 12–15°C.

    25 Oct 2016Scientific literatureInvestigate

  75. CS026
    ISO quantitative cereulide LC-MS/MS method

    Established an international LC-MS/MS method for quantitative cereulide analysis in foods intended for human consumption.

    11 Jan 2017Standards & methodsInvestigate

  76. CS167
    Multi-stage production of ARA-rich microbial oil

    process-context only; multi-stage Mortierella alpina fermentation mapped oxygen, agitation, biomass, lipid and ARA yield but measured no cereulide or B. cereus.

    18 Jan 2017Scientific literatureWatch

  77. CS027
    Growth and toxin production in reconstituted initial infant formula

    No growth or toxin production occurred at 8°C over 48 hours; at 15°C and 24°C growth and Nhe, Hbl and cereulide production occurred, with cereulide detected at high populations under abuse conditions.

    6 May 2017Scientific literatureInvestigate

  78. CS168
    Elaboration and validation of the ISO cereulide method

    interlaboratory validation covered seven spiked matrices including infant formula and supported ISO 18465.

    12 Apr 2018Standards & methodsInvestigate

  79. CS028
    National survey of B. cereus in powdered infant and follow-on formula

    In 6,656 Chinese market samples, 7.53% contained at least 10 CFU/g and 1.11% exceeded 100 CFU/g; prevalence varied by region and season.

    31 May 2018Scientific literatureWatch

  80. CS123
    First insights into within-host translocation of the Bacillus cereus toxin cereulide using a porcine model

    oral pig dosing produced neurological signs and measurable tissue distribution; repeated dosing suggested accumulation, but the authors called this preliminary.

    7 Nov 2018Scientific literatureInvestigate

  81. CS169
    LC-MS/MS identification and quantification in cow’s milk

    milk-specific LC-MS/MS achieved 2 µg/kg LOQ; 17 Tokyo milk samples were negative.

    26 Nov 2018Standards & methodsWatch

  82. CS170
    Direct MALDI-TOF differentiation of emetic and non-emetic isolates

    direct-smear MALDI classified cultured isolates with reported 99.1% accuracy.

    23 Jan 2019Standards & methodsWatch

  83. CS171
    Rapid detection of cereulide in cultures and food extracts

    MALDI/LDI detected culture-derived cereulide and some variant signal, while toxin was absent from some foods despite growth.

    9 Apr 2019Standards & methodsInvestigate

  84. CS124
    Why be serious about emetic Bacillus cereus: cereulide production and industrial challenges

    Confirmed review: summarises industrial entry routes, process persistence and HACCP implications.

    26 Jul 2019Scientific literatureInvestigate

  85. CS172
    Evaluation of MALDI-TOF for culture-derived cereulide

    blinded eight-strain classification succeeded; LDI sensitivity gain was smaller and less reproducible than previously reported.

    6 Oct 2020Standards & methodsWatch

  86. CS125
    The food poisoning toxins of Bacillus cereus

    Confirmed review: genes and organism counts do not necessarily predict toxin activity; preformed cereulide can persist without viable cells.

    28 Jan 2021Scientific literatureWatch

  87. CS029
    Modelling growth and cereulide formation across food matrices

    Growth rate and time to measurable cereulide depended differently on temperature and matrix; cereal ranked highest for toxin formation, dairy intermediate and meat or vegetable matrices lowest.

    17 Feb 2021Scientific literatureInvestigate

  88. CS229
    Structural revision of isocereulide A

    NMR, hydrolysis and MS sequencing revised isocereulide A from an O-Leu-containing proposal to a structure containing one L-O-Ile unit.

    4 Mar 2021Scientific literatureAct

  89. CS030
    Distribution of cereulide in cow-milk lipid phases

    In experiments with purified cereulide spiked into cow milk and sunflower-oil-enriched milk, increasing fat shifted more toxin into the lipid phase. The study did not test ARA oil or naturally contaminated formula.

    28 Jul 2021Scientific literatureInvestigate

  90. CS173
    Enzymatic degumming of fungal ARA oil

    ARA-refining process context only; enzymatic/ultrasound degumming reduced phosphorus but measured no cereulide or microbial hazard.

    17 Aug 2021Scientific literatureWatch

  91. CS126
    Cereulide exposure caused cytopathogenic damages of liver and kidney in mice

    28-day oral mouse exposure at 50 and 200 µg/kg induced liver/kidney oxidative stress, inflammation, ER stress and apoptosis; 10 µg/kg lacked obvious histopathology in this model.

    24 Aug 2021Scientific literatureInvestigate

  92. CS174
    Cereulide association with biofilm structures and processing surfaces

    cereulide was associated with cells, biofilm matrix and contacted glass/stainless steel rather than only surrounding liquid.

    19 Nov 2021Scientific literatureInvestigate

  93. CS127
    Acute liver failure after ingestion of fried rice balls: a case series of Bacillus cereus food poisonings

    outbreak food contained 37±11 µg/g; the twice-exposed patient had acute liver failure and toxin was measured in clinical specimens.

    23 Dec 2021Scientific literatureAct

  94. CS128
    Bacillus cereus toxin repertoire: diversity of (iso)cereulide(s)

    structures H–N were characterised and HEp-2 potency varied around the parent toxin.

    27 Jan 2022Scientific literatureInvestigate

  95. CS031
    Paediatric multi-organ failure from cereulide-producing B. cereus

    Two sisters became ill after stored pasta; an 11-year-old developed liver failure, rhabdomyolysis, coagulopathy and kidney injury, whereas a smaller exposure in her sister caused milder illness.

    14 Sept 2022Scientific literatureWatch

  96. CS032
    US powdered-infant-formula supplier and biological-hazard controls

    FDA required or urged end-to-end controls, hazard analysis for raw materials without a lethal step, supplier verification, environmental monitoring, root-cause investigation and identification of all relevant biological hazards.

    8 Mar 2023Government & assessmentAct

  97. CS033
    Lactose inhibition of cereulide biosynthesis in milk

    Lactose-free milk produced 13-fold more cereulide than whole milk; restoring lactose reduced toxin by 91%, and lactose inhibited all six tested emetic strains in laboratory medium.

    8 Dec 2023Scientific literatureWatch

  98. CS175
    Targeted LC-MS/MS for food and faeces

    targeted LC-MS/MS was validated for specified foods and faeces with isotope-labelled internal standard.

    27 Dec 2023Standards & methodsInvestigate

  99. CS129
    Effect of temperature, pH, and aw on cereulide synthesis and regulator-gene transcription with respect to Bacillus cereus growth and cereulide production

    combined temperature, pH and water activity altered growth and measured cereulide non-linearly; at 45°C cells reached about 7 log CFU/mL while toxin remained below the 0.1 ng/g LOQ in tested combinations.

    8 Jan 2024Scientific literatureInvestigate

  100. CS176
    QuEChERS LC-MS/MS screening for fried rice

    external-calibration QuEChERS screening in fried rice had 2 µg/kg LOQ and product-ion confirmation.

    22 Mar 2024Standards & methodsWatch

  101. CS130
    A poisonous cocktail: interplay of cereulide toxin and its structural isomers in emetic Bacillus cereus

    isocereulides were about 10% of toxin-family mass but contributed about 40% of HEp-2 cytotoxicity in tested natural-ratio blends.

    26 Mar 2024Scientific literatureInvestigate

  102. CS177
    Wall-material effects on ARA-oil microcapsules

    spray-drying/microencapsulation context only; the study evaluated ARA-oil encapsulation and particle properties but no cereulide or microbiological endpoint.

    30 Jun 2024Scientific literatureWatch

  103. CS034
    FDA quantitative cereulide method including infant formula

    FDA described acetonitrile extraction with isotope-labelled internal standard and UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS; validation matrices included infant formula, and positive identification requires two product ions and quality checks.

    11 Dec 2024Standards & methodsInvestigate

  104. CS178
    Solid-state production of ARA-enriched fungal lipids

    Mortierella fermentation context only; heterogeneous nutrient/oxygen gradients and ARA yield were studied without cereulide measurement.

    7 May 2025Scientific literatureWatch

  105. CS179
    Candidate cooked-rice CRM for cereulide

    ten laboratories characterised a spiked cooked-rice candidate material at 11.25 µg/kg; long-term stability and final certification were still pending.

    4 Sept 2025Standards & methodsInvestigate

  106. CS072
    Hungarian infant-formula recall after self-check at Netherlands plant

    Three formula lots were recalled after B. cereus and cereulide were reported during self-checking at a Netherlands plant; other production lots were excluded.

    10 Dec 2025Recalls & incidentsAct

  107. CS073
    Finnish single-lot precautionary formula recall

    One formula-powder lot was recalled after B. cereus was detected on a limited part of a production line; no illnesses had been reported and other formula products were excluded.

    10 Dec 2025Recalls & incidentsAct

  108. CS074
    French single-lot infant-formula recall

    One lot was recalled for possible B. cereus, with vomiting and diarrhoea advice; it had been nationally distributed but cereulide and ARA were not disclosed.

    11 Dec 2025Recalls & incidentsAct

  109. CS133
    Poland: precautionary withdrawal after a production-line B. cereus finding

    two lots were withdrawn after a production-line B. cereus finding.

    11 Dec 2025Recalls & incidentsInvestigate

  110. CS037
    Austrian public notice following earlier European recalls

    Several EU states had recalled infant-formula batches after manufacturer self-checks in the Netherlands; Austria said it was not affected and described the heat-stable cereulide hazard.

    17 Dec 2025Recalls & incidentsWatch

  111. CS075
    Danish recall history in a later amended authority release

    The authority recorded that a single batch was recalled on 10 December and publicly alerted on 11 December; later versions added products and changed the explanation to cereulide in an oil.

    18 Dec 2025Recalls & incidentsAct

  112. CS041
    First Netherlands consumer warning

    Cereulide was found in a raw material used in two specified formula batches sold domestically; caregivers were told not to use them.

    5 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsInvestigate

  113. CS042
    Nationwide German recall with later batch extension

    Multiple standard, specialist and premature-infant formula batches were recalled nationwide for cereulide; on 3 February three additional products or dates were added.

    5 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  114. CS076
    Initial UK toxin-based infant-formula recall

    Multiple formula and follow-on-formula batches were declared unsafe because of possible cereulide; the notice did not name ARA oil.

    5 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  115. CS043
    Quantified cereulide in formula from Germany

    Official retail samples measured 0.50 ± 0.16 and 0.70 ± 0.22 µg/kg; risk was potentially serious and no cases or symptoms were reported at notification.

    6 Jan 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  116. CS134
    Saudi Arabia: warning against specified infant-formula batches

    Saudi authorities warned against specified formula batches and reported no known related illness at that time.

    6 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  117. CS185
    Romanian-market manufacturer recall notice

    local manufacturer notice recalls specified lots over a potentially contaminated external-supplier ingredient and reports no confirmed case at that time.

    6 Jan 2026StakeholdersAct

  118. CS044
    A regulator outside Europe prohibits the affected lots

    Sale, distribution and use of specified lots were prohibited; the regulator described a Netherlands factory, a global third-party oil ingredient and a worldwide voluntary recall.

    7 Jan 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  119. CS078
    Trade press links cereulide to ARA oil

    The article stated cereulide was detected in ARA oil and quoted the lead manufacturer saying all ARA oil and corresponding mixes were being tested; no illnesses were confirmed.

    7 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  120. CS079
    Foodwatch questions the transparency of the recall

    Foodwatch alleged fragmented disclosure, questioned delayed global recall and traceability, and said authorities knew in December; it described the raw material as not yet publicly traced.

    7 Jan 2026StakeholdersWatch

  121. CS077
    UK recall batch-date correction

    The first UK update corrected best-before dates for recalled formula batches; it continued to describe cereulide risk without publicly identifying ARA.

    8 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  122. CS080
    French consumer association identifies ARA vehicle

    The association described an arachidonic-acid-rich oil made using Mortierella as the likely vehicle, advised preserving product for analysis and reported no intoxication then known.

    9 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  123. CS135
    Portugal: preventive withdrawal with traceability and effectiveness oversight

    Portuguese authorities monitored withdrawal effectiveness and traceability; no illness was reported.

    10 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  124. CS047
    French-produced formula recall across EU and third countries

    France recalled potentially contaminated infant formula with distribution to numerous EU countries and third countries; the RASFF risk decision was potentially serious.

    12 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  125. CS048
    ARA oil publicly named in Asia-Pacific formula recall

    Very low cereulide levels were reported in supplied ARA-rich oil; numerous infant, follow-on and young-child product batches were recalled, with no associated illness or adverse events reported.

    13 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsInvestigate

  126. CS137
    Indonesia: imported-formula test results and temporary import stop

    two imported-batch samples were below the <0.20 µg/kg LOQ, while distribution/import controls and recall supervision continued.

    14 Jan 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  127. CS138
    Finland: one traceability-driven specialist-formula extension

    one specialist reflux-formula batch was added through traceability work.

    15 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  128. CS139
    China: regulator states domestic recall was implemented

    SAMR required recall of mainland-China batches and stated the company had implemented it.

    15 Jan 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  129. CS140
    Singapore: two additional toxin-positive formulas and export stop

    SFA found cereulide in two batches, ordered recall and export controls, and reported one mild likely associated case without confirmatory clinical testing.

    17 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  130. CS081
    Open questions on recall timing, ARA identification and supplier notification

    The NGO asked when ARA contamination was identified, why December recalls were limited, what suppliers disclosed and what 2025 contamination levels and illness reports existed.

    21 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  131. CS050
    France orders sector-wide risk analysis after second manufacturer recall

    Authorities publicly linked the event to Chinese-supplied ARA-rich oil, said another manufacturer recalled six batches, and required manufacturers using the ingredient to assess each marketed lot.

    22 Jan 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  132. CS051
    Preventive withdrawal plus confirmation that another recalled range was not imported

    Two local formula batches were withdrawn because a French supplier could not exclude contaminated raw material; one batch had not been imported, and a separately recalled French product range had no registered or imported product in Taiwan.

    22 Jan 2026Government & assessmentAct

  133. CS052
    Two suspected illness reports during ongoing recall

    The regulator had received two reports of children becoming ill after consuming the formula; it did not confirm causation and continued tracing affected products and raw material.

    23 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsInvestigate

  134. CS053
    Two-company Australian infant-formula recalls

    Five batches from one company and two batches from another were recalled over an ingredient-linked cereulide risk; other batches were said to be safe and no Australian illnesses were reported.

    23 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  135. CS186
    Targeted-recall statement under evolving authority guidance

    Confirmed company statement: additional targeted analyses were said to support general compliance while a limited recall was initiated under evolving guidance.

    23 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  136. CS141
    Thailand: no authorisation or sale of the recalled formulas identified

    Thai FDA found no authorisation or identified sale of the recalled products.

    24 Jan 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  137. CS187
    Commercial laboratory statement on emerging cereulide testing

    Confirmed vendor claim: ISO-based testing was offered for oils, powders and milk powder, with ces testing described as complementary.

    26 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  138. CS055
    EU agencies describe a global preventive recall and early clinical evidence

    Gastrointestinal reports followed recalled-product consumption; no severe cases had been reported to ECDC and one toxin-positive infant recovered; EFSA was asked to derive an infant ARfD.

    27 Jan 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  139. CS082
    EU question on infant-formula governance and deaths under investigation

    A priority question asked when the Commission learned of ingredient risk and deaths, whether sourcing and notification rules were adequate and whether the framework required review.

    27 Jan 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  140. CS083
    French minister orders urgent testing by all users of implicated oil

    The minister said all manufacturers using the implicated Chinese ARA oil had been ordered to analyse oil lots, assess every potentially contaminated formula lot and recall suspected dangerous products.

    28 Jan 2026Government & assessmentAct

  141. CS035
    Initial factory detection and confirmation

    Routine checks after equipment installation at a Netherlands plant found low cereulide levels; production stopped and finished-product contamination was confirmed in early December.

    29 Jan 2026StakeholdersAct

  142. CS039
    Oil-blend and ARA hypothesis; supplier and trade-association notification

    Tests on 23–24 December attributed contamination to an oil blend containing supplier ARA oil; the company says it stopped implicated mixes, informed the supplier on 29 December and trade associations on 30 December.

    29 Jan 2026StakeholdersAct

  143. CS056
    Manufacturer publishes consolidated sequence and testing claims

    The company described more than 400 analyses, supplier notification, trade-association outreach, authority notifications from 2 January and recalls from 5 January.

    29 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  144. CS084
    Complaint filed with eight affected families

    Foodwatch alleged delayed warnings, defective recalls, deception and endangerment; eight families joined with reported gastrointestinal illness and hospitalisation.

    29 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  145. CS188
    Senate debate on phased recalls and strategic ingredient dependence

    senator raised supplier, recall-timing and strategic-dependence allegations; minister said deaths were not causally established and defended staged recalls.

    29 Jan 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  146. CS143
    Singapore: major-retailer infant-formula testing completed

    two more batches tested positive; SFA described completion of testing of products then sold by major retailers and three recovered mild cases.

    30 Jan 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  147. CS189
    Manufacturer response disputing allegations of delay and negligence

    company disputed delay/negligence allegations and claimed supplier and trade-association notifications on 29–30 December.

    30 Jan 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  148. CS057
    France lowers provisional infant exposure threshold

    France reduced the working value from 0.03 to 0.014 µg/kg body weight and required immediate use in manufacturer assessments, anticipating further recalls.

    31 Jan 2026Government & assessmentAct

  149. CS058
    Infant ARfD and formula concentration thresholds

    EFSA derived an ARfD of 0.014 µg/kg bw; concentrations above 0.054 µg/L in reconstituted infant formula and 0.1 µg/L in follow-on formula may exceed it using high-consumption assumptions.

    2 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  150. CS059
    First Austrian health-harmful concentration and earlier low-positive findings

    A recent recalled product exceeded the new ARfD several times; products testing positive in December remained assessed as not presenting a health concern.

    2 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  151. CS060
    German recall widened after reassessment

    Three additional formula products or durability dates were added to the existing cereulide recall.

    3 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  152. CS061
    Additional Northern Ireland batch added

    The recall was extended to one additional 800 g batch distributed only in Northern Ireland; affected products were considered unsafe to consume.

    3 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  153. CS085
    Italian formula occurrence and B. cereus virulence study

    B. cereus was recovered after enrichment from 44.6% of 83 formulas, but enumerable counts were only 10 CFU/g in three products; 28.6% of 42 isolates carried ces, while no formula was directly shown to contain cereulide.

    3 Feb 2026Scientific literatureWatch

  154. CS190
    Proposal for inquiry into multinational food-contamination responsibility

    proposed parliamentary inquiry concerned responsibility, controls, sanctions and data access.

    3 Feb 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  155. CS191
    European specialised-nutrition sector statement

    Confirmed association position: supported harmonised thresholds and analytical methods and described ARA-oil occurrence as uncommon.

    3 Feb 2026StakeholdersWatch

  156. CS192
    Early professional risk explanation distinguishing toxin from bacteria

    BfR distinguished preformed toxin introduced through ARA oil from bacterial growth in dry formula and said it knew of no prior literature report in infant milk powder.

    3 Feb 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  157. CS142
    Japan: no commercial import of recalled products and no implicated ingredient in domestic formula

    no commercial import of recalled products was confirmed on 26 January; the statement that domestic formula did not use implicated ingredients belongs to the 4 February amendment.

    4 Feb 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  158. CS145
    Finland: three further batches added after revised risk assessment

    three lots were added after revised European risk assessment.

    4 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  159. CS146
    Belgium: narrowly distributed 400 g infant-formula recall

    one lot sold at two named outlets was recalled for possible cereulide.

    4 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  160. CS086
    Alternative ARA supplier promotes end-to-end process control

    A supplier said its ARA products were unaffected and advocated ownership of fermentation-to-oil production, GFSI systems, microbiological monitoring, HACCP and external audits.

    5 Feb 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  161. CS193
    Threshold-driven manufacturer recall extension

    company expanded recall after revised EFSA guidance while maintaining reassurance for non-listed products.

    5 Feb 2026StakeholdersAct

  162. CS062
    Formula and powder action limits with mandatory recall response

    Limits were set at 0.054 µg/L or 0.43 µg/kg powder for infant formula and 0.1 µg/L or 0.8 µg/kg powder for follow-on formula; exceedance requires withdrawal, recall and notification.

    6 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  163. CS150
    Belgium: major extension following revised European advice

    Belgian scope expanded across multiple product formats following revised European advice.

    6 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  164. CS151
    Japan: hold instructions for Chinese ARA-oil consignments

    Japanese quarantine stations were instructed to hold declared Chinese ARA-oil consignments and require incident-link enquiries.

    10 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  165. CS194
    Call for independent controls and full transparency

    Confirmed NGO position: called for independent controls, data transparency and attention to unresolved long-term questions.

    11 Feb 2026StakeholdersWatch

  166. CS152
    Luxembourg: 30 formula samples tested and three infant cases investigated

    30 targeted formula samples produced one positive; three infant cases were investigated without toxin confirmation.

    12 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  167. CS153
    China: all domestic infant-formula producers directed to test for emetic toxin

    SAMR said recall was completed, no confirmed mainland poisoning case had been found, and all producers were directed to test for emetic toxin.

    12 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  168. CS087
    Clinical criteria for toxin testing and evidence preservation

    Cereulide testing was recommended for unexpected infant death or severe illness requiring hospitalisation after recalled formula; first stools and formula should be retained, while symptoms beginning after 12 hours were outside the protocol.

    16 Feb 2026Standards & methodsAct

  169. CS088
    Preliminary investigation follows NGO complaint

    Foodwatch reported that five investigations were opened into possible endangerment, deception and recall failures; the investigation concerned multiple manufacturers and remained preliminary.

    16 Feb 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  170. CS195
    Consumer NGO request for EU investigation and transparency

    Confirmed NGO request: asked the Commission to investigate traceability, notification, supplier audit, testing capacity and evidence retention.

    17 Feb 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  171. CS196
    Swiss follow-up requiring company and supplier-control improvements

    30 market samples were non-detects; two of three family-held samples were positive. BLV demanded review of response speed, testing and supplier oversight.

    18 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  172. CS197
    Reference-material announcement for cereulide measurement

    JRC announced a cooked-rice cereulide control material for validation and QC under ISO 18465.

    18 Feb 2026Standards & methodsWatch

  173. CS036
    First incident-linked RASFF notification and limited European recall

    The first limited European recall began on 10 December. Later official accounts conflict on the first RASFF transmission date; the Commission states it was alerted on 10 December and the notification issued on 12 December.

    19 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  174. CS038
    First cross-border infant gastrointestinal signal

    Denmark reported gastrointestinal-disease signals in infants after the December recall and countries were asked to share investigations.

    19 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsWatch

  175. CS040
    Cereulide confirmed in oil mixes and historical ARA deliveries

    A Swiss oil-mix producer detected cereulide in sampled oil mixes; retrospective analysis dated contamination to October 2024 through 2025, highest in July 2025, and mandatory testing of ARA and other fermented oils began by 5 January.

    19 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  176. CS045
    Spanish and Swiss manufacturing-site recalls

    Authorities reported recalls from Spanish and Swiss plants within the lead manufacturing group for products using contaminated ARA oil or oil mixes and distributed inside and outside the EU.

    19 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  177. CS046
    Italian recall included a batch made with ARA that tested negative

    Three follow-on-formula batches were recalled; two used a contaminated ARA lot, while the third contained an ARA batch reported negative by its oil producer.

    19 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  178. CS049
    Additional Swiss manufacturer and intermediary network implicated

    A separate Swiss manufacturer recalled products made for three customers after contaminated Chinese-origin ARA passed through German and Dutch intermediaries into oil mixes.

    19 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsInvestigate

  179. CS054
    Positive finished products and 16-batch Irish recall

    Ireland recalled 16 batches after cereulide was detected in finished products during own checks; contaminated base powder made in Ireland also entered finished products manufactured in other Member States.

    19 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  180. CS064
    Multi-country cases, eight-company traceability and low current exposure

    Seven countries reported symptomatic infants; some were hospitalised for dehydration, Belgium had eight clinical-sample positives, and large-scale recalls reduced current EU exposure likelihood to low while diagnostic and attribution uncertainty remained.

    19 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  181. CS198
    Manufacturer statement on recall completion and alternative supply

    Confirmed company disclosure: claimed recall completion, alternative supply and extensive testing, and reported financial charges.

    19 Feb 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  182. CS199
    Consumer NGO response disputing residual-risk and return advice

    Confirmed NGO position: disputed broad no-illness messaging and advocated retaining suspect tins as possible evidence.

    19 Feb 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  183. CS200
    Industry association response emphasising reduced current exposure

    Confirmed association position: recalls and interruption of implicated supply were said to have reduced current exposure likelihood.

    20 Feb 2026StakeholdersWatch

  184. CS065
    Binding controls on Chinese-origin ARA oil

    Covered Chinese-origin ARA oil requires official certification, laboratory results and 50% identity and physical checks. The prescribed analysis has a 0.1 µg/kg LOQ and requires water addition for powdered ARA oil. A transition provision ran to 26 April.

    25 Feb 2026Government & assessmentAct

  185. CS066
    Eighteen samples showed no measurable cereulide

    Eighteen samples prompted by more than 200 illness reports showed no measurable toxin and no new recalls; 37 reports concerned products outside existing warnings.

    25 Feb 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  186. CS154
    Saudi Arabia: additional infant-formula manufacturer warning

    Saudi scope expanded to further product families; withdrawal was monitored and no related illness was reported.

    27 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  187. CS155
    Belgium: authority recalls imported infant formula following RASFF

    FAVV itself recalled specified imported formula following RASFF notification.

    27 Feb 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  188. CS089
    Belgian consumer association consolidates multi-company recalls

    The association consolidated affected lots, identified the reported Chinese ARA source and advised batch checks, non-use, return and medical review for persistent symptoms.

    2 Mar 2026StakeholdersAct

  189. CS090
    Court reviews request to alter health communications

    A victim association sought urgent changes to public-health messaging and testing access; the court rejected urgent relief, limiting the claim that existing communications were manifestly unlawful.

    3 Mar 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  190. CS201
    Consumer-centre review of recalls, corrections and cautious reassurance

    Confirmed consumer synthesis: reported a narrow 33-product private-test negative and tracked correction of prior manufacturer case wording.

    6 Mar 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  191. CS063
    Recall expanded to about two million kilograms across 18 countries

    A second multinational manufacturer revised its assessment after the EFSA value and recalled products across 18 EU and non-EU countries; Dutch authorities reported no indication of associated infant deaths.

    9 Mar 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  192. CS091
    Austrian cases, extensive testing and extraction-method findings

    The authority reported 13 cases, including two confirmed, and 160 tested formula samples. By its 30 April update at the latest, it explained that encapsulated ARA could enclose toxin and that standard preparation could yield lower results in powder than in the prepared bottle; its own preparation gave equivalent results.

    9 Mar 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  193. CS092
    Commission clarifies alert timing and declines immediate rule overhaul

    The Commission said it was alerted on 10 December, the first RASFF notification issued on 12 December, existing tools were activated and no evidence showed EU rules inadequate; no comprehensive review was then planned.

    11 Mar 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  194. CS067
    Ninety-nine-country distribution and moderate global risk

    WHO reported 144 suspected and confirmed cases across ten countries, eight confirmed in Belgium, distribution to 99 countries and territories, and moderate risk because infant vulnerability, traceability and case-detection gaps remained.

    13 Mar 2026Government & assessmentAct

  195. CS093
    Commercial claim for cereulide removal from ARA oil

    A company advertised 99.99% reduction. Disclosed endpoints of 200 to below 0.3 µg/kg establish only greater than 99.85% reduction; trials toward 0.1 µg/kg were ongoing.

    Mar 2026StakeholdersInvestigate

  196. CS156
    Singapore: additional positive infant and toddler formulas

    continuing surveillance found another infant batch and a toddler-formula batch positive; no new compatible cases were reported.

    15 Mar 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  197. CS068
    No measurable toxin or new products after full complaint follow-up

    All 39 reports involving other formula were checked; market samples contained no measurable cereulide, traceability found no additional products using the contaminated ARA and no new recalls resulted.

    24 Mar 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  198. CS094
    Powdered-formula cereulide industry webinar

    Training covered recent formula outbreaks, toxin biology, testing, persistence, supply-chain management and HACCP/HARPC controls; no primary dataset was published on the page.

    26 Mar 2026StakeholdersWatch

  199. CS157
    Czechia: toxin-positive first-infant formula judged harmful

    one batch was toxin-positive and estimated newborn exposure of 0.018 µg/kg exceeded the 0.014 µg/kg ARfD.

    31 Mar 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  200. CS202
    Updated professional overview of incident and analytical response

    BfR summarised the ARA pathway, import controls, lower-LOQ method work and unresolved chronic/case-attribution questions.

    2 Apr 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  201. CS204
    Government answer on delayed-recall claims and suspect-product analysis

    retrospective government account described priority testing for hospitalised cases and optional retention routes for other symptomatic families.

    16 Apr 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  202. CS181
    Hydration-assisted SPE-UPLC-MS/MS for infant formula

    hydration before ACN increased response roughly fourfold; LOD 0.03 and LOQ 0.1 µg/kg; two naturally incurred controls assigned at 0.33 and 2.50 measured 0.37 and 2.56 µg/kg.

    8 May 2026Standards & methodsInvestigate

  203. CS095
    Parliamentary mission identifies alert and supplier-control failures

    The mission reported delayed health escalation, three companies’ notable authority-notification delays, inadequate imported-ingredient controls, analytical-method problems and no unusual severe national health signal; it issued 14 recommendations.

    19 May 2026Government & assessmentInvestigate

  204. CS097
    LC-MS/MS method for formula, ARA oil and dairy matrices

    The presenter claimed 0.05 µg/kg LOQ, 87–103% recovery and below-9% repeatability across powders, oils and emulsions, emphasising that viable-cell screening misses toxin.

    28 May 2026Standards & methodsInvestigate

  205. CS069
    New growing-up-formula positive outside the main early recall wave

    A retail-surveillance sample possibly contained cereulide; 1,320 cans had been imported, 488 were sealed, stop-sale and precautionary recall were ordered, and no related complaint was recorded.

    31 May 2026Government & assessmentAct

  206. CS098
    Direct chemical testing added to laboratory capability

    A laboratory described cereulide as an emerging chemical risk and promoted LC-MS/MS alongside microbiological methods, including newly implemented ISO 17025 capability.

    11 Jun 2026Standards & methodsInvestigate

  207. CS096
    Diagnostic evidence on encapsulated ARA and powder under-recovery

    ISO-style acetonitrile extraction measured about 0.2 ng/g in contaminated powder versus about 15 ng/g powder-equivalent after water reconstitution; encapsulated ARA similarly rose from about 23 to 750 ng/g equivalent.

    Jun 2026Standards & methodsInvestigate

  208. CS099
    Water-acetonitrile extraction corrects powder underestimation

    The publisher conclusion reports average 14-fold underestimation by acetonitrile-only extraction in the tested powdered formula contaminated through oil. Water-acetonitrile QuEChERS extraction achieved 94.9–115% recovery and 0.05 µg/kg LOQ in the evaluated matrices.

    19 Jun 2026Scientific literatureInvestigate

  209. CS100
    Commission links incident to import controls and EU fermentation capability

    The Commission reiterated third-country controls and audit or import-ban powers and identified the contaminated ingredient as fermentation-derived ARA oil; it linked future resilience to EU fermentation strategies.

    3 Jul 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  210. CS070
    One non-compliant cereulide sample among extensive ARA-formula controls

    Targeted testing of formula listing ARA or Mortierella oil ultimately showed one listed sample non-compliant for cereulide while hundreds of other entries were compliant.

    15 Jul 2026Government & assessmentAct

  211. CS182
    UPLC-MS/MS determination in ARA oil and microencapsulated ARA powder

    matrix-specific methods were developed for ARA oil and microencapsulated ARA powder; validation used blank materials spiked at 0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 µg/kg.

    23 Jul 2026Standards & methodsInvestigate

  212. CS205
    Mid-year operational recovery statement

    Confirmed company disclosure: recall effects persisted into Q2 and affected market recovery.

    23 Jul 2026StakeholdersWatch

  213. CS206
    Mid-year investor discussion of formula-category recovery

    Confirmed management statement: shelf availability had normalised and a Q3 trust/quality campaign was planned.

    29 Jul 2026StakeholdersWatch

  214. CS158
    Poland: one positive production cycle and precautionary adjacent-batch recall

    one production cycle was positive below the EU intervention threshold; repeated-use risk could not be excluded and an adjacent lot was recalled.

    17 Aug 2026Recalls & incidentsInvestigate

  215. CS071
    Draft finished-formula cereulide criterion remains proposed

    Feedback closed on 29 September 2026. Checked on 20 October, the Commission still lists adoption for the first quarter of 2027. The finished-formula criterion remains proposed, separate from existing import controls.

    1 Sept 2026Government & assessmentWatch

  216. CS207
    Exporter-facing explanation of proposed cereulide criterion

    explainer described the proposed 0.1 µg/kg criterion and consultation deadline of 29 September. It was still a draft on 25 September.

    3 Sept 2026StakeholdersAct

  217. CS231
    Cereulide in Powdered Infant Formula: Microbial Ecology, Detection, and a Supply-Chain Perspective on Risk Management

    A narrative review argues for upstream ingredient surveillance and toxin-specific testing. The accessible abstract and data-availability statement describe a synthesis of existing work, with no new experimental data. Full text was not reviewed.

    13 Oct 2026Scientific literatureInvestigate

  218. CS230
    Previously recalled Nutrilon returns to Czech retail shelves

    CAFIA reported a repeated recall at Kaufland. The affected stock had been removed on 9 October, before inspections on 14 October. The notice concerns previously recalled products, not a newly identified contamination source.

    15 Oct 2026Recalls & incidentsAct

  219. CS101
    European paediatric statement on proportionality and uncertainty

    The statement found surveillance broadly reassuring, causality difficult, long-term harm unlikely on available evidence and safe ARA alternatives available, while insisting cereulide should not exceed trace levels and methods must improve.

    Date unresolvedStakeholdersWatch

  220. CS102
    Unaffected manufacturer asserts European ARA supply is safe

    A manufacturer said its European ARA source was unaffected and that B. cereus control during fermentation made finished-product cereulide testing unnecessary.

    Date unresolvedStakeholdersInvestigate

  221. CS103
    Vendor compares ISO-style and QuEChERS formula extraction

    In spiked reconstituted formula, ISO-style and QuEChERS methods recovered 90.6% and 100.1%, with RSDs of 9.7% and 2.3%; external calibration and one commercial formula were used.

    Date unresolvedStandards & methodsInvestigate

  222. CS136
    Denmark: expanded health warning for formula remaining in households

    warning highlighted raw-material toxin findings and formula remaining in households after retail withdrawal.

    Date unresolvedRecalls & incidentsAct

  223. CS144
    Ireland: fifth batch-list revision for recalled formula

    Update 5 added batch 53390346AB and consolidated Irish batch scope.

    Date unresolvedRecalls & incidentsAct

  224. CS147
    Italy: two first-infant-formula lots recalled under revised cereulide guidance

    lots 101464106 and 101483730 were recalled to align with revised EFSA cereulide guidance.

    Date unresolvedRecalls & incidentsAct

  225. CS148
    Italy: two follow-on-formula lots produced in Ireland recalled

    Irish-produced lots 111470148 and 111516272 were recalled under revised EFSA guidance.

    Date unresolvedRecalls & incidentsAct

  226. CS149
    Italy: one additional first-infant-formula lot recalled

    lot 101489727 was recalled under revised EFSA guidance.

    Date unresolvedRecalls & incidentsAct

  227. CS180
    Infant-formula cereulide proficiency test

    Confirmed registry claim: an ISO 17043-accredited provider offered a two-material infant-formula PT, one spiked and one commercially contaminated, requiring LOQ ≤1 µg/kg.

    Date unresolvedStandards & methodsAct

  228. CS183
    Catalogue listing for 13C6-cereulide reference solution

    Confirmed catalog claim only: 13C6-cereulide solution is marketed as TraceCERT material with lot-specific certification documentation.

    Date unresolvedStandards & methodsInvestigate

  229. CS184
    Native and isotope-labelled cereulide analytical standards

    Confirmed catalog claim only: native and isotope-labelled cereulide standards are commercially listed in solution and solid forms.

    Date unresolvedStandards & methodsWatch

  230. CS203
    Hearing on risk assessment, transparency and European harmonisation

    a deputy alleged ANSES had documented general ingestion dangers since 2021; the nominee did not validate an ARA-specific warning and instead discussed transparency and harmonisation.

    Date unresolvedGovernment & assessmentWatch

06Sources

The history behindthe story.

We researched this issue with Foresight Assistant, following scientific references, official notices, laboratory methods and public statements up to 25 September 2026. The cereulide record includes a publication update checked on 20 October 2026. These 32 historical sources sit behind the walkthroughs and the wider watchlist.
  1. H01-001A novel dodecadepsipeptide, cereulide, isolated from Bacillus cereus causes vacuole formation in HEp-2 cellsScience

    Isolation of a cyclic peptide established a discrete toxin target beyond bacterial counts.

    Period
    1994
    Published
    1994
    Open the source ↗
  2. H01-005Commission Regulation (EC) No 1441/2007 amending Regulation 2073/2005Adopted rule

    Regulation 1441/2007, not original Regulation 2073/2005, introduced row 2.2.11: n=5, c=1, m=50 and M=500 CFU/g at end of manufacture.

    Period
    27 Dec 2007
    Published
    7 Dec 2007 OJ
    Open the source ↗
  3. H01-008Multi-country foodborne event caused by cereulide in infant formula productsIncident

    Later testing traced contaminated ingredient batches backwards; affected formula was identified in late November 2025.

    Period
    Oct 2024–late Nov 2025
    Published
    19 Feb 2026
    Open the source ↗
  4. H01-011Rapid risk assessment on ARfD of cereulide in infants and acute consumption of infant formulaeRisk assessment

    EFSA derived an infant ARfD and concentrations of concern for reconstituted formula, informing risk management.

    Period
    30 Jan approval; 4 Feb 2026 publication
    Published
    4 Feb 2026
    Open the source ↗
  5. H01-012Multi-country foodborne event caused by cereulide in infant formula productsOutbreak

    EFSA/ECDC evaluated symptomatic reports, product and clinical evidence, and the effect of recalls on assessed exposure.

    Period
    19 Dec 2025–13 Feb 2026
    Published
    19 Feb 2026
    Open the source ↗
  6. H01-013Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/459Adopted rule

    Regulation 2026/459 introduced certification, analytical requirements and 50% identity/physical checks.

    Period
    24 Feb adoption; 26 Feb 2026 effective
    Published
    25 Feb 2026 OJ
    Open the source ↗
  7. H01-014Draft Commission Regulation, Ares(2026)8337428; SANTE/1373/2026 draft and annexProposal

    Later verification: The detailed cereulide research confirmed that draft feedback opened on 1 September 2026. CS071 Danish SANTE draft contains corrupted tracked edits. Later Ares draft clearly proposes row 1.31, n=3, c=0 and 0.1 µg/kg, covering dried and liquid products through reconstitution-factor adjustment.

    Period
    9 Jul–19 Aug 2026 Danish consultation
    Published
    Danish hearing published 9 Jul 2026; Ares publication date not displayed
    Open the source ↗
  8. H02-001Vibrio parahaemolyticus and related halophilic vibriosOutbreak

    The outbreak led to identification of the organism later named V. parahaemolyticus.

    Period
    1950
    Published
    1982 retrospective review
    Open the source ↗
  9. H02-004Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oystersOutbreak

    An outbreak far north of the previously recognised range connected warm harvest waters with a new exposure geography.

    Period
    Jul–Aug 2004 outbreak
    Published
    6 Oct 2005
    Open the source ↗
  10. H02-012Public health aspects of Vibrio spp. related to the consumption of seafood in the EURisk assessment

    EFSA assessed occurrence, climate, antimicrobial resistance, methods and controls, with recommendations for harmonised evidence gathering.

    Period
    12 Jun adoption; 23 Jul 2024 publication
    Published
    23 Jul 2024
    Open the source ↗
  11. H02-013Increased risk of Vibrio infections throughout the summer seasonPublic-health warning

    The warning describes favourable environmental conditions and distinguishes foodborne from water-contact infection routes.

    Period
    11 Jul 2025
    Published
    11 Jul 2025
    Open the source ↗
  12. H02-014UK NMP sampling priorities for imported foods: 2026/2027Monitoring

    Relevant seafood categories are high-priority sampling targets; the plan names pathogenic species and antimicrobial-resistance screening.

    Period
    Apr 2026–Mar 2027 plan
    Published
    23 Jul 2026; PDF added 9 Sep
    Open the source ↗
  13. H03-004Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 on materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodAdopted rule

    Article 3 made businesses responsible for preventing harmful migration, unacceptable composition changes and organoleptic deterioration. It applies regardless of whether a migrant was intentionally added and remains the legal foundation for NIAS assessment.

    Period
    27 Oct 2004 adoption; 3 Dec 2004 effect
    Published
    13 Nov 2004 OJ
    Open the source ↗
  14. H03-007Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodAdopted rule

    Defined NIAS as impurities, reaction intermediates or decomposition/reaction products and required internationally recognised risk assessment for unlisted substances. This converted the unknown-migrant issue into an explicit legal duty for plastics.

    Period
    1 May 2011 application
    Published
    15 Jan 2011 OJ
    Open the source ↗
  15. H03-016Migration of oligomers from a food contact biopolymer based on PLA and polyesterScience

    UPLC-QTOF-MS identified cyclic and linear PLA/polyester oligomers; migration depended on structure and ethanol content. Some ethoxy-terminated oligomers appeared only in migration solutions, illustrating simulant-induced reaction and transformation products.

    Period
    2023
    Published
    2023
    Open the source ↗
  16. H03-020Emerging Risks and Horizon Scanning activities — annual reporting for 2025Emerging risk

    EFSA elevated increased use of bio-based and biodegradable FCMs for continued evidence gathering, reflecting uncertainty about novel constituents, allergens, contaminants, NIAS, degradation products and migration rather than a finding that the category is inherently unsafe.

    Period
    2025 scientific work; Jul 2026 report
    Published
    2026
    Open the source ↗
  17. H03-023BfR Guideline for risk assessment of NIAS in food-contact materialsGuidance

    Requires GC–MS and LC–MS screening unless justified otherwise, structure-elucidation attempts above 0.15 µg/kg, migration-tiered toxicology and expert judgement for unidentified substances. It distinguishes recycling contaminants from production NIAS.

    Period
    10 Sep 2026
    Published
    10 Sep 2026
    Open the source ↗
  18. H03-025High-throughput toxicological profiling and ToxPi-based prioritization of chemical migrants from recycled paper used in food contact materialsScience

    Migration extracts affected mitochondrial and cellular homeostasis in selected acidic/alcoholic conditions. Metals, DEHP and TBOEP correlated with toxicity, prioritising recycled-paper contact with fatty, acidic and alcoholic foods.

    Period
    9 Jul 2026 online; 1 Sep 2026 issue
    Published
    9 Jul 2026 online; 1 Sep 2026 issue
    Open the source ↗
  19. H03-026Plasticized films based on PLA and PHB: from the choice of plasticizer to the study of packaging perspectiveScience

    TA, TEC and TBAC migrated into aqueous model solutions; one plasticiser was temporarily detected in chicken. Migration reduced film performance, showing that biodegradable-polymer formulation materially affects food-contact exposure and functionality.

    Period
    30 Jan 2026 online; 20 Mar 2026 issue
    Published
    30 Jan 2026 online; 20 Mar 2026 issue
    Open the source ↗
  20. H04-031Public Consultation PC-2019 — Update of the scientific opinion on Alternaria toxins in feed and foodConsultation

    EFSA consultation PC-2019 sought comments on an updated animal- and public-health assessment, including occurrence, exposure, BMD/PBK modelling and uncertainty annexes. “PC-2019” is an identifier, not a year.

    Period
    17 Jul–30 Aug 2026
    Published
    17 Jul 2026
    Open the source ↗
  21. H04-032Horizon Scanning 2025/2026Emerging risk

    ACAF highlighted rising mycotoxin contamination, aflatoxin emergence, co-occurrence, bedding exposure and insufficient routine coverage beyond AFB1/OTA, supporting expanded monitoring and mixture-focused research.

    Period
    Oct 2025 exercise; 31 Jul 2026 publication
    Published
    31 Jul 2026
    Open the source ↗
  22. H05-001Bongkrekic Acid—a Review of a Lesser-Known Mitochondrial ToxinOutbreak

    A fatal syndrome was documented around fermented coconut tempe bongkrek, establishing the food association later used to isolate the organism and toxin.

    Period
    1895
    Published
    2017
    Open the source ↗
  23. H05-007Epidemiology of foodborne bongkrekic acid poisoning outbreaks in China, 2010 to 2020Monitoring

    Nineteen outbreaks caused 146 illnesses and 43 deaths. From 2018, commercial wet rice noodles and soaked Auricularia emerged alongside homemade fermented-corn products, showing the hazard was not confined to coconut or traditional fermentation.

    Period
    2010–2020
    Published
    4 Jan 2023
    Open the source ↗
  24. H05-0182025 EFSA Annual Report Emerging Risks and Horizon Scanning ActivitiesEmerging risk

    EFSA selected bongkrekic acid in fermented foods as one of four emerging risks after structured horizon scanning, elevating it from geographically concentrated outbreak evidence to an EU preparedness and monitoring signal.

    Period
    2025 assessment cycle; 15 Jul 2026 publication
    Published
    15 Jul 2026
    Open the source ↗
  25. H06-019Hearing on maximum levels for metals in seaweed for foodConsultation

    The earlier draft proposed binding limits for lead, cadmium, inorganic arsenic and iodine. It remained a Commission-services draft and was later superseded: the September 2026 version removed iodine from the binding regulation.

    Period
    12 May–11 Jun 2025
    Published
    12 May 2025
    Open the source ↗
  26. H06-025EU proposal on metal limits in seaweed, sampling/analysis and draft monitoring recommendationConsultation

    Rev.4 proposed binding lead, cadmium and iAs limits by seaweed colour; iodine moved to a separate non-binding recommendation with a 1.0 g/kg indicative level, monitoring and national consumption advice.

    Period
    15–25 Sep 2026 consultation; proposed application 1 Jan 2028
    Published
    15 Sep 2026 hearing
    Open the source ↗
  27. H07-008Ciguatera fish poisoning, Canary IslandsOutbreak

    Five people developed gastrointestinal and neurological illness after eating a locally caught amberjack. The report supplied early clinical evidence of autochthonous ciguatera in European Atlantic waters.

    Period
    Nov 2004 outbreak; Dec 2005 publication
    Published
    Dec 2005
    Open the source ↗
  28. H07-012Ciguatera fish poisoning outbreaks from 2012 to 2017 in Germany caused by snappers…Outbreak

    Imported Lutjanus caused multiple outbreaks, showing that European ciguatera risk is not solely geographic expansion: international trade can deliver toxic fish directly to non-endemic markets.

    Period
    2012–2017 incidents; 2019 publication
    Published
    1 Mar 2019
    Open the source ↗
  29. H07-018Code of Practice for the Prevention or Reduction of Ciguatera Poisoning, CXC 83-2024Guidance

    CXC 83-2024 established risk-based monitoring, fishing-area controls, outbreak databases, HACCP consideration, training and consumer communication. It is guidance, not a toxin maximum or binding national law.

    Period
    Nov 2024 adoption
    Published
    2024
    Open the source ↗
  30. H07-019Ciguatoxin-control protocol, exotic and invasive species, revision 8Monitoring

    Authorities require testing of selected species at specified weights, advise recreational fishers to test or avoid qualifying fish, and prohibit sale/consumption of heads and viscera from listed species regardless of weight.

    Period
    May 2025 protocol revision
    Published
    May 2025
    Open the source ↗
  31. H08-019PFAS in Fast Foods with Hot-Contact to Food-Contact Materials: Occurrence, Packaging Influence, and Risk PriorityScience

    Original-paper preparation produced 3.1–26-fold higher PFAS than glass controls. 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTS) accounted for 88.3% of the measured ∑32PFAS increment.

    Period
    1 Jul 2026 online; 14 Jul issue
    Published
    1 Jul 2026 online; 14 Jul issue
    Open the source ↗
  32. H08-020Regulation (EU) 2025/40; Commission Notice C/2026/3084Adopted rule

    Packaging first placed on the Union market from this date had to meet all three Article 5(5) thresholds. Total fluorine above 50 mg/kg triggers evidence separating PFAS-derived and non-PFAS fluorine; it is not automatically non-compliant.

    Period
    12 Aug 2026
    Published
    22 Jan 2025; guidance 10 Jun 2026
    Open the source ↗

Know which signals reachyour products.

See how Foresight scores regulatory changes against your products and markets, with a source and a reason for each alert. Your team decides when to act.

· Evidence record

Loading record…