News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

Syngenta Triumphs in Labelling Lawsuit Against Agro Trade

PPP
24
January 2024
•
431
Dr Steven Brennan
Landmark ruling reshapes parallel trade and labelling of Plant Protection Products.
Magnifying glass over a plant leaf
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

In a pivotal judgement, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has delivered a verdict in the case of Syngenta Agro GmbH vs. Agro Trade Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Case C-830/21), significantly impacting the landscape of plant protection product regulations and parallel trade within the EU. The decision, pronounced on December 7, 2023, addresses crucial aspects of labelling requirements for parallel-imported plant protection products, specifically focusing on the display of the authorisation holder’s information and the original batch number.

Background of the Case

Syngenta Agro GmbH, a prominent entity in the plant protection sector, challenged Agro Trade Handelsgesellschaft mbH, a parallel importer, for non-compliance with EU regulations. Agro Trade was alleged to have altered labels on Syngenta’s products, specifically removing Syngenta’s details as the authorisation holder and replacing the original batch numbers with its identifiers.

Key Rulings of the ECJ

The ECJ’s judgement, focusing on the interpretation of Article 1 of Regulation No 547/2011 and Annex I thereto, concluded:

‍Authorisation Holder’s Information: Parallel importers may replace the name and address of the original authorisation holder with their own details on the product packaging. This aligns with the EU’s objective of facilitating parallel trade while ensuring high levels of health and environmental protection.

‍Batch Number: Importantly, the Court ruled that parallel importers must retain the original batch number of the formulation as allocated by the manufacturer on the packaging. This decision emphasises the criticality of traceability and effective control of plant protection products.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Parallel Importers: Must adapt their labelling practices, ensuring compliance with the new directives on batch numbers while leveraging the flexibility in displaying authorisation holder information.
  • Manufacturers: Gain assurance of traceability and accountability for their products in the market.
  • Regulatory Authorities: Enhanced ability to monitor and control plant protection products, ensuring public safety.
  • Agricultural Sector: Ensured access to compliant and traceable plant protection products, fostering both safety and market competitiveness.

Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Stakeholders should urgently review and adjust their practices to align with this ruling. Manufacturers and parallel importers must collaborate to ensure the smooth transition and adherence to these guidelines. Regulatory authorities are expected to step up enforcement measures, underscoring the need for strict compliance.

The ECJ’s decision marks a significant shift in the EU’s approach to the parallel trade and labelling of plant protection products. By balancing the facilitation of trade with the imperative of product safety and traceability, this ruling paves the way for a more streamlined, yet secure, plant protection product market in the EU. Stakeholders should take proactive steps to adapt to these changes, ensuring both compliance and continued market success.

Read the source story

In a pivotal judgement, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has delivered a verdict in the case of Syngenta Agro GmbH vs. Agro Trade Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Case C-830/21), significantly impacting the landscape of plant protection product regulations and parallel trade within the EU. The decision, pronounced on December 7, 2023, addresses crucial aspects of labelling requirements for parallel-imported plant protection products, specifically focusing on the display of the authorisation holder’s information and the original batch number.

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Coffee plant growingEU Sets New MRLs for Fluxapyroxad, Lambda-Cyhalothrin, Metalaxyl, and Nicotine in Food

January 26, 2025

BeesEuropean Commission's Appeal on EFSA Guidance Document Access Denied

January 16, 2025

Tractor spraying pesticidesGerman Agriculture Group Challenges EU Decision on Fluopyram Approval Extension

January 16, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

Coffee plant growing

EU Sets New MRLs for Fluxapyroxad, Lambda-Cyhalothrin, Metalaxyl, and Nicotine in Food

Learn about the EU's new regulation setting maximum residue levels for fluxapyroxad, lambda-cyhalothrin, metalaxyl, and nicotine in food products.

26

Jan 2025

PPP
Bees

European Commission's Appeal on EFSA Guidance Document Access Denied

EU Court dismisses Commission's appeal, ensuring public access to EFSA's plant protection guidance.

16

Jan 2025

PPP
Tractor spraying pesticides

German Agriculture Group Challenges EU Decision on Fluopyram Approval Extension

German agriculture alliance challenges EU decision on Fluopyram approval extension, citing regulatory violations and health risks.

16

Jan 2025

PPP
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy