Key takeaway
What This Development Means
A new report from Stockholm University unveils challenges in EU REACH regulation, urging clearer guidance to assess the essentiality of harmful chemical uses. Use Foresight.
Source basis: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/toxicology/articles/10.3389/ftox.2024.1488336/full
A groundbreaking report from Stockholm University reveals key challenges in implementing the essential use concept under the EU's REACH regulation. The study identifies significant data gaps and recommends clearer guidelines for assessing whether harmful chemical uses are essential or non-essential.
Findings Of The Report
Released on 1 November 2024, the study conducted by Flora Borchert and colleagues from Stockholm University examined 100 applications for authorisation involving substances of very high concern (SVHCs). The essential use concept, initially inspired by the Montreal Protocol, is designed to phase out non-essential uses of harmful substances to better protect health and the environment.
Key Insights
Categorisation of Uses: The study found that 10% of the uses analysed were non-essential, while 55% were considered essential. However, 35% of cases fell into a "complex" category where essentiality could not be determined due to insufficient data.Common Substances: The most frequently analysed SVHCs included 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl) phenol (OPnEO) and chromium trioxide, which together represented 77% of the cases.Data Challenges: One major issue highlighted was the inadequate detail in applications, which impeded the identification of essential uses. Ambiguous criteria and broad end-use descriptions complicated the categorisation process.
Recommendations For Policy Change
The report recommends that the European Commission refine the essential use criteria and provide explicit guidance for applicants under REACH. This would ensure transparent and effective evaluation, aiding in the phase-out of harmful substances without compromising necessary industrial functions.
Expert Opinions
“The essential use concept is a critical tool for advancing chemical safety in Europe, but its implementation needs clearer definitions and more robust data,” said lead author Flora Borchert. The authors urge the integration of social and economic considerations in decision-making, highlighting the importance of aligning technical and societal needs.
The report serves as a call to action for the European Commission and regulatory bodies to enhance their methodologies and application processes for better protection of public health and environmental safety.
Related Articles
REACH Committee Reviews Lead, Chromium VI And CMR Measures
The February 2026 REACH Committee meeting focused on reviewing draft restrictions and authorisations for lead, chromium VI and CMR substances. While no major measures were finalised, the discussions indicate continued regulatory scrutiny and signal important developments ahead of expected votes in April.
CLP Annex VI Update: EU Proposes Major Transfer Of SVHC And Hazardous Substances
The proposed CLP Annex VI update introduces harmonised classifications for over 100 hazardous substances, including SVHCs, PFAS and endocrine disruptors. The changes will impact labelling, safety data and product formulation across multiple sectors, requiring early compliance planning and supply chain engagement.
Formaldehyde Proposed As SVHC: Implications And Next Steps
Discover the proposal to classify formaldehyde as an SVHC, its industrial uses, associated risks, and how industries can prepare for regulatory changes.
