News & InsightsNewsletterLegislation Hub

Foresight

Foresight
AboutContactLog in
Book a Demo
Foresight logo
All News & Insights

EU Lawmakers Clash Over PFAS Ban Plans in ENVI Committee Debate

REACH
16
May 2025
•
450
Dr Steven Brennan
Debate over PFAS ban intensifies as EU Commission and MEPs discuss REACH reform and industrial exemptions in May ENVI meeting.
EU Parliament
Quick prompts

AI Generated

Get to the point quicker with prompts - a smarter way to get the information you need from our articles.

Summarise this article

In its latest dialogue with Parliament, the Commission reaffirmed its plan to ban PFAS in consumer products while maintaining industrial flexibility. MEPs’ responses reveal deep divisions between public health imperatives and fears of industrial decline, setting the stage for a closely watched REACH reform process.

What is the EU’s position on banning PFAS?

The Commission supports banning PFAS in consumer products but not in critical industrial uses “where there aren't yet alternatives available,” as confirmed by Stéphane Séjourné on 13 May 2025.

What did MEPs say about PFAS in the ENVI debate?

Peter Liese warned against banning PFAS in essential uses. Jutta Paulus and Christophe Clergeau stressed the health impacts, referencing scientific evidence and Horizon Europe research.

AI Assistant

This feature and much more is available on our platform. If you would like early access, please leave your email and we'll get in touch.

We'll be in touch when the Assistant is ready.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mountains

The European Commission confirmed support for banning PFAS in consumer products during a structured dialogue with the European Parliament’s ENVI Committee on 13 May 2025, clarifying its stance ahead of the forthcoming REACH regulation revision.

Commission Executive Vice President Stéphane Séjourné stated:

“The Commission is in favour of banning them in consumer products, not in industrial applications, which are the most critical where there aren't yet alternatives available.”

This position reflects the Commission’s strategy to balance public health priorities with industrial competitiveness, a point that triggered robust discussion among MEPs with diverging priorities.

Commission Prioritises Speed and Simplification

Séjourné highlighted ongoing concerns with regulatory delays under REACH, stating:

“We can't remain so slow if we really want to keep up with the changes. And the first priority and requirement that I would say is to speed up proceedings.”

He described how the revised REACH would focus on broader restrictions over individual authorisations and seek digitalisation to assist SMEs with compliance.

“One of the objectives we can set collectively is to make a reform which would speed up proceedings for public health and citizens health and authorisation of companies and not just leave them kind of up in the air.”

MEPs Respond with Health and Industry Warnings

MEPs offered strong and varied responses. Peter Liese (EPP) supported banning PFAS in non-essential contexts but warned against excessive restrictions:

“We cannot and we must not prohibit PFAS when it is about critical use like hydrogen, wind power, vaccination, medical devices.”

He added:

“We cannot start with a bolt ban and then see what kind of derogations we do. We need to be really sophisticated, really targeted and not endanger the industrial base of the chemical industry.”

Jutta Paulus (Greens) raised health concerns and the long-known risks associated with PFAS:

“The problematic characteristics of these products have been known for at least 70 years… How do you want to ensure through REACH that such catastrophes do not happen again in the future?”

Christophe Clergeau (S&D) referenced recent findings from Horizon Europe-funded research:

“We had a research programme financed by Horizon Europe called Athlete on the impact of chemical products on child health. And we saw that there were already accumulations of PFAS, which were one of the key markers for deterioration of child health, peaking around eight years.”

Next Steps Under REACH Revision

The Commission is preparing the REACH revision for late 2025, with ECHA’s recommendations on PFAS expected by the end of 2026. However, Séjourné suggested this may be too late:

“2026 is going to seem too late for many associations who rightly are trying to protect public health... So let me suggest, and we will do this quickly, to carry out a revision of ECHA and get an action plan over the next few months.”

Note: All quotes were transcribed from the ENVI committee debate on 13 May 2025. They reflect the official meeting interpretation provided by European Parliament translators and may contain minor inaccuracies due to live translation. For precise statements, refer to the official video recording or transcript.

Read the source story

Read this article now for free!

You have read 3 articles.
Create a free account
or
Log in
to finish reading this article now.

Subscribe to our weekly digest

Sign up to receive our newsletter every Tuesday and get access to all of our content.

By creating an account, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.

Trusted by professionals at

Dupont
ECHA - European Chemicals Agency
Energizer
Chemours
This is some text inside of a div block.

Get Foresight Today

Stay compliant, reduce risk, and protect your business with our AI-powered chemical policy monitoring—tailored just for you.

Global monitoring of 1,200+ sources
Expert-reviewed, trusted regulatory alerts
Instant risk identification for 350k+ substances

Ready to supercharge your policy monitoring workflow?

We’ll be in touch soon with more details and support to help you get started.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share with a friend
Copy link

Related Articles

Paint coatingsReport Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

May 9, 2025

Automotive chrome platingEU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

May 2, 2025

Industrial coatingRegulatory Action Proposed for Amine-Terminated Aliphatic Ethers

April 17, 2025

Foresight regulatory experts
Streamline your chemical compliance
Easy-to-use product compliance management for small and mid-sized manufacturers — mitigate risk and protect market access.
Get started
Subscribe to Foresight's newsletter
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Join 1,000s of compliance professionals getting the latest insights right to their inbox for free, every Tuesday.
100% free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Stay ahead with the latest news & insights
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter covering news, events, and expert insights.

Related articles

EU Parliament

EU Lawmakers Clash Over PFAS Ban Plans in ENVI Committee Debate

Debate over PFAS ban intensifies as EU Commission and MEPs discuss REACH reform and industrial exemptions in May ENVI meeting.

16

May 2025

REACH
Paint coatings

Report Suggests Restrictions on Methylenedianilines Amid Carcinogenic and Environmental Concerns

ECHA flags methylenedianilines for potential restrictions in EU due to health and environmental risks; industry urged to monitor developments.

9

May 2025

REACH
Automotive chrome plating

EU Proposes Chromium(VI) REACH Restriction to Safeguard Worker Health

The EU's proposed Chromium(VI) restriction could reshape REACH compliance and exposure controls across industry. Learn what it means for your business.

2

May 2025

REACH
Foresight
Providing critical insights, analysis, and guidance to help businesses anticipate changes, make informed decisions, and stay ahead.
News & Insights
Newsletter
Legislation Hub
Coverage
Contact
About
© 2025 Foresight. All rights reserved.
SitemapTerms of servicePrivacy policyCookie policy