
Norway Investigation Highlights Persistent Concerns Over Flame Retardant EBTBP
Learn about ECHA’s evaluation of EBTBP, a flame retardant flagged for its environmental persistence and potential health risks, and the ongoing regulatory review process.


The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has released a screening report evaluating the necessity of imposing restrictions on the use of Bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether (Diglyme) in articles as per REACH Article 69(2). This substance, identified under EC number 203-924-4 and CAS number 111-96-6, is recognized for its toxic reproductive properties. Despite its potential hazards, current evaluations indicate no immediate risk associated with its use in articles within the European Economic Area (EEA).
Diglyme, listed as entry 25 in REACH Annex XIV, has undergone rigorous assessment by ECHA's Committee for Risk Assessment. The committee has established specific dermal and inhalation Derived No-Effect Levels (DNELs) due to its classification as toxic for reproduction. However, available data does not suggest any significant human exposure risk from articles containing Diglyme, leading to the preliminary conclusion that no further restrictions are required at this time.
The screening focused on the current usage of Diglyme in the EEA, especially in the production of articles like vehicle parts, electronic components, and potentially in batteries. Despite its applications as a solvent or processing aid, there is no indication that Diglyme remains in finished articles, except possibly as an electrolyte in batteries—a use not yet commercialized in Europe.
The report underscores that there is no current risk from Diglyme in articles based on its unlikely presence in automotive parts, electronic components, and plastic products. The situation regarding batteries remains under surveillance, with future developments to be regulated under the EU Batteries Regulation.
ECHA recommends continuous monitoring of Diglyme's use in the EU, especially in emerging applications like battery production. Any significant changes or evidence of risk could prompt a reassessment and potential regulatory actions to ensure public health and environmental safety.
The assessment was conducted in line with REACH Article 69(2), focusing on after-sunset date evaluations of substances listed in Annex XIV for their risk management in articles, highlighting the specific approach to human health and environmental hazards associated with Diglyme.
Foresight continuously tracks 1000s of sources and maps updates to your portfolio:




Learn about ECHA’s evaluation of EBTBP, a flame retardant flagged for its environmental persistence and potential health risks, and the ongoing regulatory review process.

ECHA evaluates risks of 4-OPnEO and 4-NPnEO in articles like coatings and glass, aiming for potential EU-wide restrictions to protect the environment.

Learn about the European Chemicals Agency's (ECHA) investigation into aromatic brominated flame retardants (ABFRs) and their environmental impact, highlighting regulatory considerations and alternatives.
Subscribe to Foresight Weekly and get the latest insights on regulatory changes affecting chemical compliance.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime.
Read by professionals at